Thermomigration as a driving force for instability of electromigration induced mass transport in interconnect lines
Source abstract
Abstract
Linear instability of electromigration induced mass transport is studied as an intrinsic mechanism of void nucleation and growth in interconnect lines. Heat conduction along the conductor line and between the conductor line and surrounding materials is added to a recent model, proposed by Korhonen.et al. (1993) for electromigration induced stress evolution, to examine the role of thermomigration in linear instability of uniform mass transport. The analysis shows that thermomigration is the leading driving force for instability of electromigration-induced mass transport in interconnect lines. This theoretical prediction seems to qualitatively agree with a recent experimental study. These results suggest that thermomigration, which has been ignored in most previous studies, could play a significant role in electromigration failure of interconnect lines.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. P. S. HO and T. KWOK, Report. Progr. Phy. 52 (1989) 301.10.1088/0034-4885/52/3/002 ↗
2. D. G. PIERCE and P. G. BRUSIUS, Microelectron. Reliab. 37 (1997) 1053.10.1016/S0026-2714(96)00268-5 ↗
3. H. OKABAYASHI, S. SHINGUBARA and P. HO, "Stressinduced phenomena in metalization," Fourth international workshop. AIP Conference Proceedings No. 418 (1998).
4. F. A. NICHOLS and W. W. MULLINS, Trans. AIME 233 (1965) 1840.
5. B. J. SPENCER, S. H. DAVIS and P. W. VOORHEES, Phys. Review B 47 (1993) 9760.10.1103/PhysRevB.47.9760 ↗
6. M. SHATZKES and J. R. LLOYD, J. Appl. Phy. 59 (1986) 3890.10.1063/1.336731 ↗
7. J. R. LLOYD and J. KITCHIN, J. Mater. Res. 9 (1994) 563.10.1557/JMR.1994.0563 ↗
8. V. M. DWYER, F. S. WANG and P. DONALDSON, J. Appl. Phy. 76 (1994) 7305.10.1063/1.358018 ↗
9. C. Q. RU, Acta. Mater. 47(1999) 3571.10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00241-4 ↗
10. A. F. BASTAWROS and K. S. KIM, Journal of Electronic Packaging (ASME) 120 (1998) 354.10.1115/1.2792646 ↗
11. M. A. KORHONEN, P. BORGESEN, K. N. TU and C. Y. LI, J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) 3790.10.1063/1.354073 ↗
12. J. J. CLEMENT and C. V. THOMPSON, ibid 78 (1995) 900.10.1063/1.360281 ↗
13. J. R. LLOYD, Semicond. Sci. Tech. 12 (1997) 1177.10.1088/0268-1242/12/10/002 ↗
14. R. KIRCHHEIM, Acta. Metal. 40 (1992) 309.10.1016/0956-7151(92)90305-X ↗
15. Y. S. CHAUG and H. L. HUANG, J. Appl. Phys. 47 (1976) 1775.10.1063/1.322890 ↗
16. H. A. SCHAFFT, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices ED-34 (1987) 664.10.1109/T-ED.1987.22978 ↗
17. I. A. BLECH, J. Appl. Phys. 47 (1975) 1203.10.1063/1.322842 ↗
18. P. S. HO, ibid. 41 (1970) 64.10.1063/1.1658379 ↗
19. A. CHRISTOU, in "Electromigration and Electronic Device Degradation," edited by A. Christou, (JohnWiley & Sons, Inc. New York 1994) p. 291.
20. S. A. LYTLE and A. S. OATES, J. Appl. Phys. 71 (1992) 174.10.1063/1.350733 ↗
21. M. SCHIMSCHAK and J. KRUG, Physical Review Letters. 80 (1998) 1674.10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1674 ↗
22. M. R. GUNGOR and D. MAROUDAS, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 2233.10.1063/1.369532 ↗
23. D. R. FRIDLINE and A. F. BOWER, ibid. 85 (1999) 3168.10.1063/1.369656 ↗
24. M. MAHADEVAN and R. M. BRADLEY, Physical Review B 59 (1999) 11037.10.1103/PhysRevB.59.11037 ↗