Therapeutic cobalt ion incorporated in poly(vinyl alcohol)/bioactive glass scaffolds for tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid scaffolds appear as a promising strategy to accelerate bone tissue repair due to their biocompatibility and to combine physical, mechanical and biological characteristics similar to those of human bone tissue. However, there are no studies in hybrid scaffolds using the sol–gel method and a foaming system, with the direct incorporation of cobalt therapeutic ion. In this work, novel porous polyvinyl alcohol polymer (PVA)/bioactive glasses (BG) hybrids scaffolds containing cobalt were obtained, combining the PVA non-toxicity, non-carcinogenicity and processability to the BG bioactivity and osteogenic properties and Co angiogenic effect by the sol–gel and foaming processing method, in order to obtain a new scaffold with angiogenic properties. The effects of Co incorporation on scaffold structure, bioactivity and ion release were evaluated. Cell viability and cell growth assay were performed on human umbilical vein endothelial cells, demonstrating excellent mitochondrial activity without cytotoxicity and cell-friendly environment. Hybrid scaffolds supported fast ion release and an elastic modulus of 20.19 MPa. The presence of cobalt was confirmed by SEM and EDS. Co-incorporated samples showed high porosity and favorable pore size. PVA–BG hybrid scaffolds containing Co showed ionic release rate in the therapeutic range and are promising for angiogenesis in tissue engineering applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14(3):88–9510.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
2. Gerhardt L-C, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Basel 3(7):3867–3910
3. Lao J, Dieudonné X, Fayon F, Montouillout V, Jallot E (2016) Bioactive glass-gelatin hybrids: building scaffolds with enhanced calcium incorporation and controlled porosity for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B 4(14):2486–249710.1039/C5TB02345A ↗
4. Abid Z, Hakiki A, Boukoussa B, Launay F, Hamaizi H, Bengueddach A et al (2019) Preparation of highly hydrophilic PVA/SBA-15 composite materials and their adsorption behavior toward cationic dye: effect of PVA content. J Mater Sci 54(10):7679–7691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03415-w10.1007/s10853-019-03415-w ↗
5. Zhuang PY, Li YL, Fan L, Lin J, Hu QL (2012) Modification of chitosan membrane with poly(vinyl alcohol) and biocompatibility evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol 50(3):658–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.01.02610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.01.026 ↗
6. Dattola E, Parrotta EI, Scalise S, Perozziello G, Limongi T, Candeloro P et al (2019) Development of 3D PVA scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering and cell screening applications. RSC Adv 9(8):4246–425710.1039/C8RA08187E ↗
7. Novak BM (1993) Hybrid nanocomposite materials—between inorganic glasses and organic polymers. Adv Mater 5(6):422–43310.1002/adma.19930050603 ↗
8. Arik N, Inan A, Ibis F, Demirci EA, Karaman O, Ercan UK et al (2019) Modification of electrospun PVA/PAA scaffolds by cold atmospheric plasma: alignment, antibacterial activity, and biocompatibility. Polym Bull 76(2):797–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2409-810.1007/s00289-018-2409-8 ↗
9. Hatton J, Davis GR, Mourad AHI, Cherupurakal N, Hill RG, Mohsin S (2019) Fabrication of porous bone scaffolds using alginate and bioactive glass. J Funct Biomater. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1001001510.3390/jfb10010015 ↗
10. Mouriño V, Cattalini JP, Boccaccini AR (2012) Metallic ions as therapeutic agents in tissue engineering scaffolds: an overview of their biological applications and strategies for new developments. J R Soc Interface 9(68):401–41910.1098/rsif.2011.0611 ↗
11. Brauer DS (2015) Bioactive glasses—structure and properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 54(14):4160–418110.1002/anie.201405310 ↗
12. El-Fiqi A, Kim TH, Kim M, Eltohamy M, Won JE, Lee EJ et al (2012) Capacity of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles to deliver therapeutic molecules. Nanoscale 4(23):7475–748810.1039/c2nr31775c ↗
13. Hoppe A, Jokic B, Janackovic D, Fey T, Greil P, Romeis S et al (2014) Cobalt-releasing 1393 bioactive glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(4):2865–287710.1021/am405354y ↗
14. Lin WC, Yao C, Huang TY, Cheng SJ, Tang CM (2019) Long-term in vitro degradation behavior and biocompatibility of polycaprolactone/cobalt-substituted hydroxyapatite composite for bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater 35(5):751–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.02310.1016/j.dental.2019.02.023 ↗
15. Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2006) Polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering and controlled drug delivery. Tissue Eng I 102(October 2005):47–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/b13724010.1007/b137240 ↗
16. Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2011) Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 49(12):832–86410.1002/polb.22259 ↗
17. Vinatier C, Mrugala D, Jorgensen C, Guicheux J, Noël D (2009) Cartilage engineering: a crucial combination of cells, biomaterials and biofactors. Trends Biotechnol 27(5):307–31410.1016/j.tibtech.2009.02.005 ↗
18. Morrison WA (2009) Progress in tissue engineering of soft tissue and organs. Surgery 145(2):127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.07.01710.1016/j.surg.2008.07.017 ↗
19. de Oliveira AAR, Gomide VS, de Fátima LM, Mansur HS, de Magalhäes PM (2009) Effect of polyvinyl alcohol content and after synthesis neutralization on structure, mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of sol-gel derived hybrid foams. Mater Res 12(2):239–24410.1590/S1516-14392009000200021 ↗
20. de Oliveira AAR, Oréfice RL, Mansur HS, Pereira M (2008) Effect of increasing polyvinyl alcohol content on the porous structure and mechanical properties of sol-gel derived hybrids foams. Key Eng Mater 361–363:555–558
21. Gomide V, Cavalcanti Zonari AA, Breyner NM, de Goes AM, Pereira MM (2011) Attachment and proliferation of human-adipose-tissue-derived stem cells on bioactive glass/PVA hybrid scaffolds. ISRN Mater Sci 2011:1–710.5402/2011/240864 ↗
22. Gomide VS, Zonari A, Ocarino NM, Goes AM, Serakides R, Pereira MM (2012) In vitro and in vivo osteogenic potential of bioactive glass–PVA hybrid scaffolds colonized by mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater 7(1):1–1010.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015004 ↗
23. Costa HS, Mansur AAP, Pereira MM, Mansur HS (2012) Engineered hybrid scaffolds of poly(vinyl alcohol)/bioactive glass for potential bone engineering applications: synthesis, characterization, cytocompatibility, and degradation. J Nanomater 2012:1–1610.1155/2012/718470 ↗
24. Martins T, Oliveira AAR, Oliveira AC, Boaventura TP, Barrioni BR, Costa-Júnior ES et al (2017) Novel 3D composites with highly flexible behavior based on chitosan and bioactive glass for biomedical applications. Mater Chem Phys 189:1–1110.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.12.012 ↗
25. Maçon ALB, Kim TB, Valliant EM, Goetschius K, Brow RK, Day DE et al (2015) A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26(2):1–10
26. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27(15):2907–291510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
27. Farano V, Cresswell M, Gritsch K, Jackson P, Attik N, Grosgogeat B et al (2018) Bioactivity evaluation of collagen-based scaffolds containing a series of Sr-doped melt-quench derived phosphate-based glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6110-010.1007/s10856-018-6110-0 ↗
28. Xu M, Zhai D, Chang J, Wu C (2014) In vitro assessment of three-dimensionally plotted nagelschmidtite bioceramic scaffolds with varied macropore morphologies. Acta Biomater 10(1):463–47610.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.011 ↗
29. Wu C, Zhou Y, Fan W, Han P, Chang J, Yuen J et al (2012) Hypoxia-mimicking mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable cobalt ion release for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33(7):2076–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.042 ↗
30. Haridas D, Biffinger JC, Boyd TJ, Fulmer PA, Hamdan LJ, Fitzgerald LA (2018) Laboratory growth of denitrifying water column microbial consortia from deep-sea shipwrecks in the northern Gulf of Mexico. F1000Research 6(May):1–1010.12688/f1000research.12713.3 ↗
31. Addis R, Campesi I, Fois M, Capobianco G, Dessole S, Fenu G et al (2014) Human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs) have a sex: characterisation of the phenotype of male and female cells. Biol Sex Differ 5(1):1–1210.1186/s13293-014-0018-2 ↗
32. El-Kady AM, Ali AF (2012) Fabrication and characterization of ZnO modified bioactive glass nanoparticles. Ceram Int 38(2):1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4823-710.1007/s10971-018-4823-7 ↗
33. Atkinson I, Anghel EM, Predoana L, Mocioiu OC, Jecu L, Raut I et al (2016) Influence of ZnO addition on the structural, in vitro behavior and antimicrobial activity of sol–gel derived CaO–P2O5–SiO2 bioactive glasses. Ceram Int 42(2):3033–3045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.09010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.090 ↗
34. Serra J, González P, Liste S, Serra C, Chiussi S, León B et al (2003) FTIR and XPS studies of bioactive silica based glasses. J Non Cryst Solids 332(1–3):20–2710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.013 ↗
35. Moreira CDF, Carvalho SM, Mansur HS, Pereira MM (2016) Thermogelling chitosan-collagen-bioactive glass nanoparticle hybrids as potential injectable systems for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng, C 58:1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.07510.1016/j.msec.2015.09.075 ↗
36. Souza L, Lopes JH, Encarnação D, Mazali IO, Martin RA, Camilli JA et al (2018) Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies of novel melt-derived Nb-substituted 45S5 bioglass reveal its enhanced bioactive properties for bone healing. Sci Rep 8(1):1–15
37. Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9(1):4457–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
38. Cecilia JA, Moreno Tost R, Retuerto MM (2019) Mesoporous materials: from synthesis to applications. Int J Mol Sci 20(13):1–410.3390/ijms20133213 ↗
39. Rabiee SM, Nazparvar N, Azizian M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L (2015) Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: a review. Ceram Int 41(6):7241–7251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140 ↗
40. Abbasi Z, Bahroloolum ME, Shariat MH, Bagheri R (2015) Bioactive glasses in dentistry: a review. J Glas Dent A Rev 2(1):1–910.4103/2348-2915.154629 ↗
41. Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S (2018) Bioactive glasses: where are we and where are we going? J Funct Biomater 9(1):1–2610.3390/jfb9010025 ↗
42. Shah FA, Brauer DS, Hill RG, Hing KA (2015) Apatite formation of bioactive glasses is enhanced by low additions of fluoride but delayed in the presence of serum proteins. Mater Lett 153:143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.01310.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.013 ↗
43. Barrioni BR, de Laia AGS, Valverde TM, da Martins TM, Caliari MV, de Sá MA et al (2018) Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and structure of cobalt-releasing sol-gel bioactive glass. Ceram Int 44(16):20337–20347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.022 ↗
44. Lins CEC, De Carvalho SM, De Oliveira AAR, De Magalhães PM (2016) Application of fluorine containing bioactive glass nanoparticles in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Key Eng Mater 696(1):103–10710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.696.103 ↗
45. Kuboki Y, Takita H, Kobayashi D, Tsuruga E, Inoue M, Murata M et al (1998) BMP-induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: topology of osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res 39(2):190–19910.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199802)39:2<190::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
46. Story BJ, Wagner WR, Gaisser DM, Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM (1998) In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13(6):749–757
47. Costa HS, Rocha MF, Andrade GI, Barbosa-Stancioli EF, Pereira MM, Orefice RL et al (2008) Sol–gel derived composite from bioactive glass–polyvinyl alcohol. J Mater Sci 43(2):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1875-410.1007/s10853-007-1875-4 ↗
48. Firouzi M, Nguyen AV (2014) Effects of monovalent anions and cations on drainage and lifetime of foam films at different interface approach speeds. Adv Powder Technol 25(4):1212–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.06.00410.1016/j.apt.2014.06.004 ↗
49. Lulevich V, Yang H, Isseroff RR, Liu G (2010) Single cell mechanics of keratinocyte cells. Ultramicroscopy 110(12):1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.07.00910.1016/j.ultramic.2010.07.009 ↗
50. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ (2010) The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(3):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.06310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 ↗
51. Rossi E, Gerges I, Tocchio A, Tamplenizza M, Aprile P, Recordati C et al (2016) Biologically and mechanically driven design of an RGD-mimetic macroporous foam for adipose tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 104:65–7710.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.004 ↗
52. Ignjatovic N, Tomic S, Ilo M, Miroslav D, Milenko M, Ic P et al (1999) Synthesis and properties of hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide composite biomaterials. Biomaterials 20:809–81610.1016/S0142-9612(98)00234-8 ↗
53. Oki A, Qiu X, Alawode O, Foley B (2006) Synthesis of organic-inorganic hybrid composite and its thermal conversion to porous bioactive glass monolith. Mater Lett 60(21–22):2751–275510.1016/j.matlet.2006.01.084 ↗
54. Zhang D, Chang H, Sun Y, Jiang C, Yao Y, Zhang Y (2017) Fabrication of platinum-loaded cobalt oxide/molybdenum disulfide nanocomposite toward methane gas sensing at low temperature. Sens Actuators B Chem 252:624–63210.1016/j.snb.2017.06.063 ↗
55. Pascuta P, Borodi G, Jumate N, Vida-Simiti I, Viorel D, Culea E (2010) The structural role of manganese ions in some zinc phosphate glasses and glass ceramics. J Alloys Compd 504(2):479–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.14710.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.147 ↗
56. Gentleman E, Fredholm YC, Jell G, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, O’Donnell MD, Hill RG et al (2010) The effects of strontium-substituted bioactive glasses on osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro. Biomaterials 31(14):3949–395610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.121 ↗
57. Goel A, Rajagopal RR, Ferreira JMF (2011) Influence of strontium on structure, sintering and biodegradation behaviour of CaO-MgO-SrO-SiO2-P2O5-CaF2 glasses. Acta Biomater 7(11):4071–408010.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.047 ↗
58. De Oliveira AAR, De Souza DA, Dias LLS, De Carvalho SM, Mansur HS, De Magalhães Pereira M (2013) Synthesis, characterization and cytocompatibility of spherical bioactive glass nanoparticles for potential hard tissue engineering applications. Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/8/2/02501110.1088/1748-6041/8/2/025011 ↗
59. Quinlan E, Partap S, Azevedo MM, Jell G, Stevens MM, O’Brien FJ (2015) Hypoxia-mimicking bioactive glass/collagen glycosaminoglycan composite scaffolds to enhance angiogenesis and bone repair. Biomaterials 52(1):358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.006 ↗
60. Daou S, El Chemaly A, Christofilopoulos P, Bernard L, Hoffmeyer P, Demaurex N (2011) The potential role of cobalt ions released from metal prosthesis on the inhibition of Hv1 proton channels and the decrease in Staphyloccocus epidermidis killing by human neutrophils. Biomaterials 32(7):1769–177710.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.016 ↗
61. Patntirapong S, Habibovic P, Hauschka PV (2009) Effects of soluble cobalt and cobalt incorporated into calcium phosphate layers on osteoclast differentiation and activation. Biomaterials 30(4):548–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.06210.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.062 ↗
62. Fleury C, Petit A, Mwale F, Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Tabrizian M et al (2006) Effect of cobalt and chromium ions on human MG-63 osteoblasts in vitro: morphology, cytotoxicity, and oxidative stress. Biomaterials 27(18):3351–336010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.035 ↗
63. Zhang M, Wu C, Li H, Yuen J, Chang J, Xiao Y (2012) Preparation, characterization and in vitro angiogenic capacity of cobalt substituted β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics. J Mater Chem 22(40):21686–2169410.1039/c2jm34395a ↗
64. Vyas VK, Kumar AS, Sunil P, Singh SP, Pyare R (2015) Bioactivity and mechanical behaviour of cobalt oxide-doped bioactive glass. Bull Mater Sci 38(4):957–96410.1007/s12034-015-0936-6 ↗
65. Gibson LJ (2005) Biomechanics of cellular solids. J Biomech 38(3):377–39910.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 ↗
66. Costa HS, Mansur AAP, Barbosa-Stancioli EF, Pereira MM, Mansur HS (2008) Morphological, mechanical, and biocompatibility characterization of macroporous alumina scaffolds coated with calcium phosphate/PVA. J Mater Sci 43(2):510–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1849-610.1007/s10853-007-1849-6 ↗
67. El-Hadi A, Schnabel R, Straube E, Müller G, Henning S (2002) Correlation between degree of crystallinity, morphology, glass temperature, mechanical properties and biodegradation of poly (3-hydroxyalkanoate) PHAs and their blends. Polym Test 21(6):665–67410.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-8 ↗
68. Montjovent M, Mathieu L, Hinz B, Applegate LL, Bourban P, Zambelli P et al (2005) Biocompatibility of bioresorbable poly(L-lactic acid) composite scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming with human fetal bone cells. Tissue Eng 11(11–12):1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.164010.1089/ten.2005.11.1640 ↗
69. Shi D, Jiang G (1998) Synthesis of hydroxyapatite films on porous Al2O3 substrate for hard tissue prosthetics. Mater Sci Eng, C 6(2–3):175–18210.1016/S0928-4931(98)00048-4 ↗
70. Sun M, Lu X, Hao L, Wu T, Zhao H, Wang C (2015) The influences of purple sweet potato anthocyanin on the growth characteristics of human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Food Nutr Res 59(March):1–9