Design of superhydrophobic ultraoleophobic NyCo
Source abstract
Abstract
The apparent contact angles of dodecane droplets deposited on a 50:50 nylon:cotton blended woven fabric (NyCo) were measured, and the characteristics required for an ultraoleophobic surface were described. The metastable Cassie–Baxter model, a transition status from the original Cassie–Baxter model to the Wenzel model, was investigated to design ultraoleophobic surfaces and to understand the wetting behavior of such surfaces. Using chemical and geometrical modifications of NyCo, a surface having contact angles to dodecane of greater than 150° and water contact angles of greater than 165° has been prepared. Good agreement between the predicted and measured contact angles was obtained. Developing a superhydrophobic ultraoleophobic material has been achieved by two criteria: a low-surface-energy and a properly designed surface morphology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Cai Y, Li Q, Wei Q, Wu Y, Song L, Hu Y (2008) J Mater Sci 43:6132. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2921-610.1007/s10853-008-2921-6 ↗
2. Lee B, Dai G (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4848. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3739-610.1007/s10853-009-3739-6 ↗
3. Pascual M, Balart R, Sanchez L, Fenollar O, Calvo O (2008) J Mater Sci 43:4901. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2712-010.1007/s10853-008-2712-0 ↗
4. Berketis K, Tzetzis D (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3578. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3485-9s10.1007/s10853-009-3485-9 ↗
5. Huang X, Fang X, Lu Z, Chen S (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4522. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3660-z10.1007/s10853-009-3660-z ↗
6. Lee HJ (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4645. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3711-510.1007/s10853-009-3711-5 ↗
7. Mueller-Plathe F, Pal S, Weiss H, Keller H (2005) Soft Mater 3:2110.1080/15394450500408959 ↗
8. Hoefnagels HF, Wu D, de With G, Ming W (2007) Langmuir 23:1315810.1021/la702174x ↗
9. Brewer SA, Willis CR (2008) Appl Surf Sci 254:645010.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.053 ↗
10. Ahuja A, Taylor JA, Lifton V, Sidorenko AA, Salamon TR, Lobaton EJ, Kolodner P, Krupenkin TN (2008) Langmuir 24:910.1021/la702327z ↗
11. Lee HJ, Willis C (2009) Chem Ind 21
12. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2007) Science 318:161810.1126/science.1148326 ↗
13. Lee HJ, Michielsen S (2007) J Polym Sci B 45:253
14. Tuteja A, Choi W, Mabry JM, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:1820010.1073/pnas.0804872105 ↗
15. Leng B, Shao Z, de With G, Ming W (2009) Langmuir 25:245610.1021/la8031144 ↗
16. Steele A, Bayer I, Loth E (2009) Nano Lett 9:50110.1021/nl8037272 ↗
17. Lee HJ, Michielsen S (2006) J Text Inst 97:45510.1533/joti.2006.0271 ↗
18. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Trans Faraday Soc 40:54610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
19. Wenzel RN (1936) Ind Eng Chem 28:98810.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
20. Michielsen S, Lee HJ (2007) Langmuir 23:600410.1021/la063157z ↗