journal article·2002-06

Effect of carbon content on the Hall-Petch parameter in cold drawn pearlitic steel wires

Won Jong Nam, Chul Min Bae, Chong Soo Lee

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of the carbon content on the Hall-Petch parameter has been investigated for fully pearlitic steels with the carbon range of 0.52–0.92 wt%. The increase of the carbon content in pearlitic steels enhances tensile strength and hardening rate of cold drawn pearlitic steels by the refinement of the initial interlamellar spacing and the increase of the Hall-Petch parameter. The Hall-Petch parameter is not influenced by the initial interlamellar spacing of pearlite although refining the initial interlamellar spacing increases tensile strength and hardening rate during wire drawing. However, the carbon content in cold drawn pearlitic steels significantly affects the magnitude of the Hall-Petch parameter. The magnitude of the Hall-Petch parameter, k, is expressed as a function of the volume fraction of cementite (V c, i.e. the carbon content); k = constant · V c 1/2 · (1 − V c), which shows a good agreement between experimental and calculated values.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. E. O. HALL, Proc. Phys. Soc. B64 (1951) 747.10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
2. N. J. PETCH, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174 (1953) 25.
3. J. D. EMBURY and R. M. FISHER, Acta Met. 14 (1966) 147.10.1016/0001-6160(66)90296-3 ↗
4. G. LANGFORD, Met. Trans. A 8A (1977) 861.10.1007/BF02661567 ↗
5. I. P. KEMP, Mat. Forums 14 (1990) 270.
6. B. MINTS, Metals Tech. 11 (1984) 265.10.1179/030716984803274693 ↗
7. M. DOLLAR, I. M. BERNSTEIN and A. W. THOMPSON, Acta Metall. 36 (1988) 311.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90008-9 ↗
8. H. CHOI and K. PARK, Scripta Mater. 34 (1996) 857.10.1016/1359-6462(95)00607-9 ↗
9. D. CHEETHAM and N. RIDLEY, Metal Sci. 9 (1975) 422.10.1179/030634575790444612 ↗
10. Y. OHMORI and R. W. K. HONEYCOMBE, in Proceedings International Conference of Sci. Technol. Iron Steel, section 6, Tokyo (1971) p. 1160.
11. J. J. PEPE, Met. Trans. 4A (1973) 2455.10.1007/BF02669390 ↗
12. M. A. P. DEWEY and G. W. BRIERS, J. Iron Steel Inst. 204 (1966) 102.
13. D. A. PORTER, K. E. EASTERING and G. D. W. SMITH, Acta Met. 26 (1978) 1405.10.1016/0001-6160(78)90156-6 ↗
14. E. C. PURCINO and P. R. CETLIN, Scripta Met. 25 (1991) 167.10.1016/0956-716X(91)90374-A ↗
15. V. K. CHANDHOK, A. KASAK and J. P. HIRTH, Trans. ASM 59 (1966) 288.
16. L. E. MILLER and G. C. SMITH, J. Iron Steel Inst. 208 (1970) 998.
17. D. J. ALEXANDER and I. M. BERNSTEIN, in “Phase Transformations in Ferrous Alloys,” edited by A. R. Marder and J. I. Goldstein (TMS/AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984) p. 243.
18. J. G. SEVILLANO, Mater. Sci. and Eng. 21 (1975) 221.10.1016/0025-5416(75)90218-9 ↗
19. K. MAURER and D. H. WARRINGTON, Phil. Mag. 15 (1967) 321.10.1080/14786436708227704 ↗
20. A. INOUE, T. OGURA and T. MASUMOTO, Trans. JIM 17 (1976) 149.10.2320/matertrans1960.17.149 ↗
21. J. C. M. LI, Trans. AIME 227 (1963) 239.
22. E. E. UNDERWOOD, in “Quantitative Stereology” (Addison-Wesly, Massachusettes, 1969) p. 73.
23. J. LANGUILLAUME, G. KAPELSKI and B. BAUDELET, Acta Mater. 45 (1997) 1201.10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00216-9 ↗
24. H. G. READ, W. T. REYNOLDS JR., K. HONO and T. TARUI, Scripta Mater. 37 (1997) 1221.10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00223-6 ↗