journal article·2018-01

A generalized weakest-link model for size effect on strength of quasi-brittle materials

Wei-Sheng Lei

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The work contributes to the statistical approach to unitedly characterize the random variation and size effect of brittle fracture strength of materials. Current practices rely on the conventional Weibull statistics and more recently on the weakest-link statistical model conforming to the uniform spatial distribution of microcracks. Based on the understanding that the weakest-link postulate is built on the mutual independence of microcracks and is not necessarily bounded to the uniform spatial distribution of microcracks, this work develops a generic weakest-link statistical formulation pertaining to a power-law spatial distribution of mutually non-interactive microcracks to synchronize the random variation and size effect of brittle fracture strength. The formulation encompasses both Weibull statistics and the uniform spatial distribution law-based weakest-link model as its subordinate members. A resultant master curve behavior between a compound parameter and the nominal fracture strength is identified for size scaling of strength and is validated by the strength data of a wide spectrum of quasi-brittle materials including wood, concrete, coal, gamma titanium aluminum alloy, nuclear-grade graphite and aluminum foam on geometrically self-similar specimens under same loading conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Ingeniorsvetenskapakademiens Handlinger 151:1–45
2. Lei W-S (2016) Evaluation of the basic formulations for the cumulative probability of brittle fracture with two different spatial distributions of microcracks. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39:611–62310.1111/ffe.12383 ↗
3. Lei W-S (2016) A framework for statistical modeling of plastic yielding initiated cleavage fracture of structural steels. Philos Mag 96:3586–363110.1080/14786435.2016.1232494 ↗
4. Matthews JR, McClintock FA, Shack W (1976) Statistical determination of surface flaw density in brittle materials. J Am Ceram Soc 59:304–30810.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10970.x ↗
5. Batdorf SB, Heinisch HL Jr (1978) Weakest link theory reformulated for arbitrary fracture criterion. J Am Ceram Soc 61:355–35810.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09327.x ↗
6. Lamon J (1988) Statistical approaches to failure for ceramic reliability assessment. J Am Ceram Soc 71:106–11210.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05825.x ↗
7. Nurhuda I, Lam NTK, Gad EF, Calderone I (2010) Estimation of strengths in large annealed glass panels. Int J Solids Struct 47:2591–259910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.015 ↗
8. Jeulin D (2011) Multi-scale random sets: from morphology to effective properties and to fracture statistics. J Phys Conf Ser 319:1–1110.1088/1742-6596/319/1/012013 ↗
9. Lei W-S (2016) A cumulative failure probability model for cleavage fracture in ferritic steels. Mech Mater 93:184–19810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.11.001 ↗
10. Lei W-S (2016) Fracture probability of a randomly oriented microcrack under multi-axial loading for the normal tensile stress criterion. Theor Appl Fract Mech 85:164–17210.1016/j.tafmec.2016.01.004 ↗
11. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 22:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
12. Lei W-S, Yu Z (2016) A statistical approach to scaling size effect on strength of concrete incorporating spatial distribution of flaws. Constr Build Mater 122:702–71310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.102 ↗
13. Lei W-S (2016) Statistics of single-fiber tensile strength incorporating spatial distribution of microcracks. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39:1337–135110.1111/ffe.12445 ↗
14. Lei W-S, Su P (2016) An approach to scaling size effect on strength of quasi-brittle biomedical materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:428–43210.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.023 ↗
15. Yu Z, Lei W-S, Zhai J (2017) A synchronized statistical characterization of size dependence and random variation of breakage strength of individual brittle particles. Powder Technol 317:329–33810.1016/j.powtec.2017.05.012 ↗
16. Watson AS, Smith RL (1985) An examination of statistical theories for fibrous materials in the light of experimental data. J Mater Sci 20:3260–3270. doi: 10.1007/BF0054519310.1007/BF00545193 ↗
17. Padgett WJ, Durham SD, Mason AM (1995) Weibull analysis of the strength of carbon fibers using linear and power law models for the length effect. J Compos Mater 29:1873–188410.1177/002199839502901405 ↗
18. Curtin WA (2000) Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced composites: III. Beyond the traditional Weibull model for fiber strengths. J Compos Mater 34:1301–133210.1177/002199830003401503 ↗
19. Dresbach C, Becker T, Reh S, Wischek J, Zur S, Buske C, Schmidt T, Tiefers R (2016) Stochastic reliability model for application in a multidisciplinary optimization of a low pressure turbine blade made of titanium aluminide. Lat Am J Solids Struct 13:2316–233210.1590/1679-78252521 ↗
20. Mishnaevsky L, Qing H (2008) Micromechanical modelling of mechanical behavior and strength of wood: state-of-the-art review. Comput Mater Sci 44:363–37010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.043 ↗
21. Dill-Langer G, Cruz Hidalgo R, Kun F, Moreno Y, Aicher S, Herrmann HJ (2003) Size dependency of tension strength in natural fiber composites. Physica A 325:547–56010.1016/S0378-4371(03)00141-9 ↗
22. Moshtaghin AF, Franke S, Keller T, Vassilopoulos AP (2016) Experimental characterization of longitudinal mechanical properties of clear timber: random spatial variability and size effects. Constr Build Mater 120:432–44110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.109 ↗
23. Uhre Pedersen M, Clorius CO, Damkilde L, Hoffmeyer P (2003) A simple size effect model for tension perpendicular to the grain. Wood Sci Technol 37:125–14010.1007/s00226-003-0168-6 ↗
24. Bazant ZP, Kim J-K, Pfeiffer PA (1986) Nonlinear fracture properties from size effect tests. ASCE J Struct Eng 112:289–30710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(289) ↗
25. Marti P (1990) Size effect in double-punch tests on concrete cylinders. ACI Mater J 86:597–601
26. Steart FA (1954) Strength and stability of pillars in coal mines. J Metall Min Soc S Afr 3:309–325
27. Gonzatti C, Zorzi L, Agostini IM, Fiorentini JA, Viero AP, Philipp RP (2014) In situ strength of coal bed based on the size effect study on the uniaxial compressive strength. Int J Min Sci Technol 24:747–75410.1016/j.ijmst.2014.10.003 ↗
28. Yoon JH, Byun TS, Strizak JP, Snead LL (2011) Characterization of tensile strength and fracture toughness of nuclear graphite NBG-18 using subsize specimens. J Nucl Mat 412:315–32010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.019 ↗
29. Blazy J-S, Marie-Louise A, Forest S, Chastel Y, Pineau A, Awade A, Grolleron C, Moussy F (2004) Deformation and fracture of aluminium foams under proportional and non proportional multi-axial loading: statistical analysis and size effect. Int J Mech Sci 46:217–24410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.03.005 ↗
30. Barrett JD (1974) Effect of size on tension perpendicular-to-grain strength of Douglas-fir. Wood Fiber 6:126–143
31. Madsen B, Buchanan AH (1986) Size effects in timber explained by a modified weakest link theory. Can J Civ Eng 13:218–23210.1139/l86-030 ↗
32. Fonselius M (1997) Effect of size on the bending strength of laminated veneer lumber. Wood Sci Technol 31:399–41310.1007/BF00702562 ↗