Interface modification of clay and graphene platelets reinforced epoxy nanocomposites: a comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
The interface between the matrix phase and dispersed phase of a composite plays a critical role in influencing its properties. However, the intricate mechanisms of interface are not fully understood, and polymer nanocomposites are no exception. This study compares the fabrication, morphology, and mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites tuned by clay layers (denoted as m-clay) and graphene platelets (denoted as m-GP). It was found that a chemical modification, layer expansion and dispersion of filler within the epoxy matrix resulted in an improved interface between the filler material and epoxy matrix. This was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and transmission electron microscope. The enhanced interface led to improved mechanical properties (i.e. stiffness modulus, fracture toughness) and higher glass transition temperatures (T g) compared with neat epoxy. At 4 wt% m-GP, the critical strain energy release rate G 1c of neat epoxy improved by 240 % from 179.1 to 608.6 J/m2 and T g increased from 93.7 to 106.4 °C. In contrast to m-clay, which at 4 wt%, only improved the G 1c by 45 % and T g by 7.1 %. The higher level of improvement offered by m-GP is attributed to the strong interaction of graphene sheets with epoxy because the covalent bonds between the carbon atoms of graphene sheets are much stronger than silicon-based clay.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Alcock JR (2007) Epoxy-based fibre reinforced nanocomposites. Adv Eng Mater 9:835–84710.1002/adem.200700118 ↗
2. Becker O, Simon GP (2005) Epoxy layered silicate nanocomposites. Adv Polym Sci 179:29–8210.1007/b107204 ↗
3. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2003) Mechanical and fracture properties of epoxy/inorganic micro- and nano-composites. J Mater Sci Lett 22:1439–144110.1023/A:1025719715808 ↗
4. Ma J, La LTB, Zaman I et al (2011) Fabrication, structure and properties of epoxy/metal nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 296:465–47410.1002/mame.201000409 ↗
5. Amdouni N, Sautereau H, Gerard JF (1992) Epoxy composites based on glass-beads. 2. Mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 46:1723–173510.1002/app.1992.070461004 ↗
6. Ma J, Mo M-S, Du X-S, Dai S-R, Luck I (2008) Study of epoxy toughened by in situ formed rubber nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci 110:304–31210.1002/app.27882 ↗
7. Kinloch A, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eager C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2006) The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 41:129310.1007/s10853-005-7261-1 ↗
8. Ozturk A, Kaynak C, Tincer T (2001) Effects of liquid rubber modification on the behaviour of epoxy resin. Eur Polym J 37:2353–236310.1016/S0014-3057(01)00158-6 ↗
9. Choi J, Yee AF, Laine RM (2004) Toughening of cubic silsesquioxane epoxy nanocomposites using core shell rubber particles; a three component hybrid system. Macromolecules 37:3267–327610.1021/ma0303723 ↗
10. Jia XT, Campos-Delgado J, Terrones M, Meunier V, Dresselhaus MS (2011) Graphene edges: a review of their fabrication and characterization. Nanoscale 3:86–9510.1039/C0NR00600A ↗
11. Goettler LA, Lee KY, Thakkar H (2007) Layered silicate reinforced polymer nanocomposites: development and applications. Polym Rev 47:291–31710.1080/15583720701271328 ↗
12. Ratna D, Manoj N, Varley R, Singh Raman R, Simon GP (2003) Clay reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Int 52:1403–140710.1002/pi.1166 ↗
13. Zaman I, Manshoor B, Khalid A, Araby S (2014) From clay to graphene for polymer nanocomposites—a survey. J Polym Res 21:42910.1007/s10965-014-0429-0 ↗
14. Morvan M, Espinat D, Lambard J, Zemb T (2002) Ultrasmall-angle and small-angle X-ray scattering of smectite clay suspensions. Colloids Surf A 82:193–20310.1016/0927-7757(93)02656-Y ↗
15. Lee C, Wei XD, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–38810.1126/science.1157996 ↗
16. Ma J, Xu J, Ren JH, Yu ZZ, Mai YW (2003) A new approach to polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polymer 44:4619–462410.1016/S0032-3861(03)00362-8 ↗
17. Zaman I, Phan TT, Kuan H-C et al (2011) Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength. Polymer 52:1603–161110.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.003 ↗
18. Zaman I, Le Q, Kuan HC et al (2011) Interface-tuned epoxy/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 52:497–50410.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.007 ↗
19. Zaman I, Kuan HC, Meng Q et al (2012) A facile approach to chemically modified graphene and its polymer nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 22:2735–274310.1002/adfm.201103041 ↗
20. Araby S, Zaman I, Meng Q et al (2013) Melt compounding with graphene to develop functional, high-performance elastomers. Nanotechnology 24:165601–16561410.1088/0957-4484/24/16/165601 ↗
21. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1994) Synthesis and characterisation of layered silicate–epoxy nanocomposites. Chem Mater 6:1719–172510.1021/cm00046a026 ↗
22. Miller SG, Bauer JL, Maryanski MJ et al (2010) Characterization of epoxy functionalized graphite nanoparticles and the physical properties of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 70:1120–112510.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.023 ↗
23. Choi JS, Lim ST, Choi HJ, Pozsgay A, Szazdi L (2006) Effect of interfacial interaction on the structure and rheological properties of polyamide-6/clay nanocomposites. Compos Interfaces 13:773–78210.1163/156855406779366705 ↗
24. Gorga RE, Lau KKS, Gleason KK, Cohen RE (2006) The importance of interfacial design at the carbon nanotube/polymer composite interface. J Appl Polym Sci 102:1413–141810.1002/app.24272 ↗
25. Ma J, Meng Q, Michelmore A et al (2013) Covalently bonded interfaces for polymer/graphene composites. J Mater Chem A 1:4255–426410.1039/c3ta01277h ↗
26. Ma J, Meng Q, Zaman I et al (2014) Development of polymer composites using modified, high-structural integrity graphene platelets. Compos Sci Technol 91:82–9010.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.017 ↗
27. Cravotto G, Cintas P (2010) Sonication-assisted fabrication and post-synthetic modifications of graphene-like materials. Chem Eur J 16:5246–525910.1002/chem.200903259 ↗
28. Meng Q, Zaman I, Hannam JR et al (2011) Improvement of adhesive toughness measurement. Polym Test 30:243–25010.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.01.001 ↗
29. Katti KS, Sikdar D, Katti DR, Ghosh P, Verma D (2006) Molecular interactions in intercalated organically modified clay and clay–polycaprolactam nanocomposites: experiments and modeling. Polymer 47:403–41410.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.055 ↗
30. Madejova J (2003) Vib Spectrosc 31:110.1016/S0924-2031(02)00065-6 ↗
31. McMurry J (2004) Organic chemistry. Brooks/Cole, California
32. Kuan HC, Chuang WP, Ma CCM, Chiang CL, Wu HL (2005) Synthesis and characterization of a clay/waterborne polyurethane nanocomposite. J Mater Sci 40:179–18510.1007/s10853-005-5704-3 ↗
33. Zhang K, Wang L, Wang F, Wang G, Li Z (2004) Preparation and characterization of modified-clay-reinforced and toughened epoxy–resin nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 91:2649–265210.1002/app.13445 ↗
34. Gass MH, Bangert U, Bleloch AL, Wang P, Nair RR, Geim AK (2008) Free-standing graphene at atomic resolution. Nat Nanotechnol 3:676–68110.1038/nnano.2008.280 ↗
35. Kornmann X, Lindberg H (2001) Synthesis of epoxy–clay nanocomposites: influence of the nature of the curing agent on structure. Polymer 42:4493–449910.1016/S0032-3861(00)00801-6 ↗
36. Le QH, Kuan H-C, Dai J-B, Zaman I, Luong L, Ma J (2010) Structure–property relations of 55 nm particle-toughened epoxy. Polymer 51:4867–487910.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.038 ↗