journal article·2011-12

Morphological comparison of isotactic polypropylene molded by water-assisted and conventional injection molding

Xianhu Liu, Guoqiang Zheng, Kun Dai, Zhenhua Jia, Songwei Li, Chuntai Liu, Jingbo Chen, Changyu Shen, Qian Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

It is well known that water-assisted injection molding (WAIM) process can be fulfilled based on the melt filling stage of conventional injection molding (CIM) process. However, due to the different physical fields involved during WAIM and CIM processes, WAIM part should exhibit unique morphological features compared with the CIM one. In this study, isotactic polypropylene (iPP) parts were prepared by WAIM and CIM, respectively, and their comparative study on morphology were therefore carried out by means of polarized optical microscopy (POM) and two-dimensional (2D) wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD). POM observations illustrated that the WAIM part exhibits a “skin–core–water channel” structure, while the CIM part shows a typical “skin–core” structure. 2D-WAXD results showed obvious arclike reflections in each position along thickness direction of the WAIM part, indicating a pronounced molecular orientation. Furthermore, a parent–daughter model (or branched shish-kebab structure) appears at 0 and 100 μm for both the parts, and the fraction of daughter lamellae for WAIM part is lower than that of CIM part. As for the 1D-WAXD curves, it is noticed that there is a very tiny (300) reflection of β-form in the CIM part, while it is invisible in all positions of the WAIM part. In addition, the crystallinity and crystalline size L of CIM part are found to be higher than that of WAIM part. Those results demonstrate that water penetration and rapid cooling rate have a significant effect on the morphological features of WAIM part.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Knights M (2002) Plast Technol 48:4210.1049/ir:20020511 ↗
2. Liu SJ, Su PC (2009) Polym Test 28:6610.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.10.008 ↗
3. Liu SJ, Lin MJ, Wu YC (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:141510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.016 ↗
4. Huang HX, Deng ZW (2008) J Appl Polym Sci 108:22810.1002/app.27560 ↗
5. Lin KY, Liu SJ (2010) Macromol Mater Eng 295:34210.1002/mame.200900285 ↗
6. Liu SJ, Lin WR, Lin KY (2010) Morphological development in water assisted injection molded polyethylene/polyamide-6 blends. Polym Adv Technol. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.172110.1002/pat.1721 ↗
7. Huang HX, Zhou RH (2010) Polym Test 29:23510.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.006 ↗
8. Liu SJ, Wu YC (2007) Polym Test 26:23210.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.10.008 ↗
9. Liu XH, Zheng GQ, Jia ZH, Li SW, Liu CG, Zhang Y, Shao CG, Dai K, Liu BC, Zhang QX, Wang SJ, Liu CT, Chen JB, Peng XF, Shen CY (2011) The hierarchical structure of water-assisted injection molded HDPE: SAXS study. J Appl Polym Sci. (in press)10.1002/app.36408 ↗
10. Wang Y, Gao Y, Shi J (2008) J Appl Polym Sci 107:30910.1002/app.27121 ↗
11. Wang Y, Na B, Fu Q, Men YF (2004) Polymer 45:20710.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.020 ↗
12. Zhu PW, Edward G (2004) Macromolecules 37:265810.1021/ma0358374 ↗
13. Zhu PW, Tung J, Edward G (2005) Polymer 46:1096010.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.023 ↗
14. Zheng GQ, Yang W, Yin B, Yang MB, Liu CT, Shen CY (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 2006(102):306910.1002/app.24792 ↗
15. Zheng GQ, Huang L, Yang W, Yang B, Yang MB, Li Q, Shen CY (2007) Polymer 48:548610.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.047 ↗
16. Zhong GJ, Li LB, Mendes E, Byeloy D, Fu Q, Li ZM (2006) Macromolecules 39:677110.1021/ma0604845 ↗
17. Zhong GJ, Li ZM, Li LB, Mendes E (2007) Polymer 48:172910.1016/j.polymer.2007.01.056 ↗
18. Picken SJ, Aerts J, Visser R, Northolt MG (1990) Macromolecules 23:384910.1021/ma00218a021 ↗
19. Kumaraswamy G, Verma RK, Kornfield JA, Yeh F, Hsiao BS (2004) Macromolecules 37:900510.1021/ma035840n ↗
20. Somani RH, Hsiao BS, Nogales A, Fruitwala H, Srinivas S, Tsou AH (2001) Macromolecules 34:590210.1021/ma0106191 ↗
21. Nogales A, Mitchell GR, Vaughan AS (2003) Macromolecules 36:489810.1021/ma0343028 ↗
22. Fujiyama M, Wakino T, Kawasaki Y (1988) J Appl Polym Sci 35:2910.1002/app.1988.070350104 ↗
23. Lotz B, Wittmann JC (1986) J Polym Sci Part B 24:154110.1002/polb.1986.090240712 ↗
24. Zhu PW, Tung J, Edward G, Nichols L (2008) J Appl Phys 103:12490610.1063/1.2931009 ↗
25. Zhu PW, Phillips A, Tung J, Edward G (2005) J Appl Phys 97:10490810.1063/1.1897072 ↗
26. Zhu PW, Edward G (2008) J Mater Sci 43:645910.1007/s10853-008-2979-1 ↗
27. Schrauwen BAG, Breemen LCAv, Spoelstra AB, Govaert LE, Peters GWM, Meijer HEH (2004) Macromolecules 37:861810.1021/ma048884k ↗
28. Obadal M, Čermák R, Raab M, Vincent V, Commereuc S, Fraïsse F (2006) Polym Degradation Stab 91:45910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.046 ↗
29. Li YB, Shen KZ (2008) J Macromol Sci B 47:100010.1080/00222340802219370 ↗
30. Bai HW, Wang Y, Zhang ZJ, Han L, Li YL, Liu L, Zhou ZW, Men YF (2009) Macromolecules 42:664710.1021/ma9001269 ↗
31. Bai HW, Wang Y, Song B, Li YL, Liu L (2008) Polym Eng Sci 48:153210.1002/pen.21125 ↗
32. Chen YH, Zhong GJ, Wang Y, Li ZM, Li LB (2009) Macromolecules 42:434310.1021/ma900411f ↗
33. Kalay G, Bevis MJ (1997) J Polym Sci B 35:24110.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19970130)35:2<241::AID-POLB5>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
34. Fujiyama M (1995) Int Polym Process 10:17210.3139/217.950172 ↗
35. Turner-Jones A, Aizelwood JM, Beckett DR (1964) Macromol Chem 75:13410.1002/macp.1964.020750113 ↗
36. Varga J, Karger-Kocsis J (1995) Polymer 36:487710.1016/00323-8619(59)9305E- ↗
37. Alexander LE (1976) X-ray diffraction methods in polymer science. Wiley, New York
38. Zhu PW, Tung J, Phillips A, Edward G (2006) Macromolecules 39:182110.1021/ma052375g ↗
39. Kang J, Chen JY, Cao Y, Li HL (2010) Polymer 51:24910.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.018 ↗