Ultrasound devulcanization: comparison of synthetic isoprene and natural rubbers
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulfur-cured vulcanizates of unfilled synthetic isoprene rubber (IR) were prepared and successfully devulcanized in a continuous co-axial ultrasonic reactor. Die pressure characteristics and ultrasonic power consumptions were measured. Network structures of the virgin vulcanizates, devulcanizates and revulcanizates were characterized by gel fraction and crosslink density according to the classic swelling method. The molecular characteristics of the sol generated by ultrasound treatment were determined by GPC. Kinetics of revulcanization, rheological properties of the devulcanizates and mechanical properties of the revulcanizates were compared with those of virgin uncured IR and their vulcanizates. In addition, a comparison of the cure behavior, devulcanization characteristics, network structures and the mechanical properties was made between IR and the natural rubber (NR) reported earlier. Simulations on the correlation of the normalized gel fraction and the normalized crosslink density show that these two rubbers have almost equivalent probability of main chain scission and crosslink rupture ratio, which is probably determined by the main chain structure of both rubbers consisting of cis-1,4-isoprene.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Kawahara S (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 78:151010.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1510::AID-APP70>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
2. Barlow FW (1993) Rubber compounding: principles, materials and techniques, 2nd edn., chapter 2. Marcel Dekker, New York
3. Subramaniam A (1990) In: Ohm RF (eds) The Vanderbilt rubber handbook, 13rd edn., chapter 2. R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Norwalk
4. Loganathan KS (2000) Rubber engineering, chapter 10. McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Yun J, Oh JS, Isayev AI (2000) Rubber Chem Technol 74:31710.5254/1.3544953 ↗
6. Tapale M, Isayev AI (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:200710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981205)70:10<2007::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
7. Hong CK, Isayev AI (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 79:234010.1002/1097-4628(20010328)79:13<2340::AID-APP1042>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
8. Levin VYu, Kim SH, Isayev AI, Massey J, von Meerwall E (1996) Rubber Chem Technol 69:10410.5254/1.3538350 ↗
9. Isayev AI, Kim SH, Levin VYu (1997) Rubber Chem Technol 70:19410.5254/1.3538424 ↗
10. Yun J, Isayev AI (2003) Rubber Chem Technol 76:25310.5254/1.3547738 ↗
11. Oh JS, Isayev AI (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93:116610.1002/app.20508 ↗
12. Isayev AI, Ghose S (2005) In: De SK, Isayev AI, Khait K (eds) Rubber recycling, 1st edn., chapter 9. CRC Press, Boca Raton
13. Flory PJ, Rehner J Jr (1950) J Chem Phys 18:10810.1063/1.1747424 ↗
14. Bielstein G (1961) Rubber Chem Technol 34:31910.5254/1.3540203 ↗
15. Shankar U (1952) Rubber Chem Technol 25:24110.5254/1.3543386 ↗
16. Makarov VM, Drozdovski VF (1991) Reprocessing of tires and rubber wastes, chapter 2. Ellis Horwood, New York
17. Levin VYu, Kim SH, Isayev AI (1997) Rubber Chem Technol 70:12010.5254/1.3538412 ↗
18. Yun J, Isayev AI, Kim SH, Tapale M (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 88:43410.1002/app.11741 ↗
19. Yashin VV, Isayev AI (2000) Rubber Chem Technol 73:32510.5254/1.3547594 ↗
20. Gordon M (1962) Proc Roy Soc (London) A268:24010.1098/rspa.1962.0136 ↗
21. Dobson GR, Gordon M (1965) J Chem Phys 43:70510.1063/1.1696794 ↗
22. Isayev AI, Hong CK, Kim KJ (2003) Rubber Chem Technol 76:92310.5254/1.3547782 ↗
23. Loganathan KS (2000) Rubber engineering, chapter 1. McGraw-Hill, New York