Tow pullout behavior of polymer-coated Kevlar fabric
Source abstract
Abstract
Tow pullout response of polymer-coated woven Kevlar fabric is investigated experimentally. Various material microstructures are created by applying heat and pressure to polymer-coated fabric to change polymer surface morphology. The pullout behavior is studied by conducting tow pullout tests using a pullout fixture. Single tow is pulled from the fabric loaded with tension in the direction transverse to that of pull. The tests are performed at various loading rates to investigate rate sensitivity of pullout load and energy. Load versus displacement data is obtained, from which the peak loads and pullout energies are computed. The results are compared with baseline neat fabric as well as baseline fabric with polymer coating. The results of the investigation show that for the Kevlar fabric under consideration, the neat fabric shows no loading rate dependence. On the other hand, the polymer-coated fabric shows loading rate dependence. Moreover, the heat-compressing of the fabric seems to have significant influence on tow pullout behavior. The results of pullout tests show that by simply compressing the fabric in the presence of heat may influence the interactions at tow cross-over regions to results in higher pullout energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Briscoe BJ, Motamedi F (1992) Wear 158:22910.1016/0043-1648(92)90041-6 ↗
2. Bazenov S (1997) J Mater Sci 32:4167. doi: 10.1023/A:101867452899310.1023/A:1018674528993 ↗
3. Shocky DA, Erlich DC, Simons JW Improved barriers to turbine engine fragments: interim report III. DOT/FAA/AR-99/8,III, Office of Aviation Research, Washington, DC, 20591
4. Kirkwood KM, Kirkwood JE, Lee YS, Egres RG Jr, Wagner NJ (2004) Text Res J 74(10):92010.1177/004051750407401012 ↗
5. Billion HH, Robinson DJ (2001) Int J Impact Eng 25:41110.1016/S0734-743X(00)00049-X ↗
6. Johnson GR, Beissel SR, Cunniff PM (1999) In: Proceedings of 18th international symposium on ballistics, vol 2. pp 962–969
7. Lim CT, Shim VPW, Ng YH (2003) Int J Impact Eng 28:1310.1016/S0734-743X(02)00031-3 ↗
8. Roylance D, Wilde A, Tocci G (1973) Text Res J 43:3410.1177/004051757304300105 ↗
9. Shocky DA, Erlich DC, Simons JW (2002) Improved barriers to turbine engine fragments: interim report IV. 2002, DOT/FAA/AR-99/8,IV, Office of Aviation Research, Washington, DC, 20591
10. Duan Y, Keefe M, Bogetti TA, Powers B (2006) Int J Mech Sci 48:3310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.007 ↗
11. Zeng XS, Tan VBC, Shim VPW (2006) Int J Numer Methods Eng 66:130910.1002/nme.1596 ↗
12. Pan N, Yoon MY (1993) Text Res J 63(11):62910.1177/004051759306301103 ↗
13. Valizadeh M, Hosseini RSA, Salimi M, Sheikhzadeh M (2008) J Text Inst 99:3710.1080/00405000701567712 ↗
14. Kalman DP, Merrill RL, Wagner NJ, Wetzel ED (2009) Appl Mater Interfaces 1(11):260210.1021/am900516w ↗
15. Ma L, Bin Y, Sakai Y, Chen Q, Kurosu H, Matsuo M (2001) Macromolecules 34(14):480210.1021/ma002110w ↗
16. DuPontTM Vamac®, http://www2.dupont.com/Vamac/en_US/
17. Samant KR, Sauer BB, Minshon JC Fabrics with strain-responsive viscous liquid polymers. United States Patent Application Publication No.: US 2006/0286882 A1
18. Harkare A, Gillespie JW Jr (2004) J Thermoplast Compos Mater 17(5):38710.1177/0892705704035409 ↗
19. Bastien LJ, Gillespie JW Jr (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31(24):172010.1002/pen.760312406 ↗