The effect of excimer laser surface treatment on the pitting corrosion fatigue behaviour of aluminium alloy 7075
Source abstract
Abstract
An excimer laser (KrF) operating at a wavelength of 248 nm was used to modify the surface microstructure of 7075-T651 aluminium alloy. The aim was to improve both the corrosion resistance and the pitting corrosion fatigue resistance of the alloy by means of laser surface melting (LSM). The microstructure and the phases of the modified surface structure were analysed, and the corrosion behaviour of the untreated and the laser-treated specimens were evaluated by immersion test. The fatigue resistance of the 7075 alloy has been presented in the form of S/N curves. A microscopical examination and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study revealed that LSM caused a reduction both in number and size of constituent particles and a refinement of the grain structure within the laser melted zone. As a result, the corrosion resistance of the aluminium alloy was improved. There was a significant reduction in the number of corrosion pits and shallow attack occurred. The fatigue test results showed that under dry fatigue conditions, the total fatigue life of the laser treated specimens, in which the crack initiation period is of considerable significance, was lower than that of the untreated specimens. However, after shot peening, the fatigue life of the laser treated specimens was recovered. This was primarily attributed to the elimination of surface defects, but also be in part, due to the introduction of compressive residual stresses in the surface layer of the specimen. The fatigue resistance of the shot peened laser-treated specimens, tested in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution with 48 hrs prior immersion, was greater than the untreated specimens with an increase of two orders of magnitude in fatigue life. This was primarily due to the elimination of surface defects and the reduction of corrosion pits.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Engineering Applied Research · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. R. P. Wei, C. M. Liao and M. Gao, Metall. Mats Trans A 29A (1997) 1153.
2. M. Puiggali, A. Zielinski, J. M. Olive, E. Renauld, D. Desjardins and M. Cid, Corrosion Science 40 (1998) 805.10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00002-X ↗
3. A. Morris, Materials Word 6(7) (1998) 407.
4. I. J. Polmear, J. of Metals 20(6) (1968) 44.
5. K. K. Sankaran, R. Perez and K. V. Jata, Mater. Sci. & Eng. A 297 (2001) 223.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01216-8 ↗
6. P. S. Pao, C. R. Feng and S. J. Gill, Corrosion 56(10) (2000) 1022.10.5006/1.3294379 ↗
7. G. M. Ludtka and D. E. Laughlin, Metallurgical Transactions A 13A (1982) 411.10.1007/BF02643350 ↗
8. P. J. E. Forsyth, Materials Science Technology 15(3) (1999) 301.10.1179/026708399101505879 ↗
9. R. Li, M. G. S. Ferreira, A. Almeida, R. Vilar, K. G. Watkins, M. A. McMahon and W. M. Steen, Surface and Coatings Technology 81 (1996) 290.10.1016/0257-8972(95)02484-0 ↗
10. M. G. S. Ferreira, R. Li, J. S. Fernandes, A. Almedia, R. Vilar, K. G. Watkins and W. M. Steen, Materials Science Forum 192–194 (1995) 421.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.192-194.421 ↗
11. A. Koutsomichalis and A. Kefalidou, Journal of Laser Applications 8 (1996) 247.10.2351/1.4745429 ↗
12. K. G. Watkins, M. A. McMahon and W. M. Steen, Mater. Sci. and Eng. A231 (1997) 55.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00034-8 ↗
13. T. M. Yue, Y. X. Wu and H. C. Man, Surface & Coating Technology 114 (1999) 13.10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00015-8 ↗
14. C. P. Chan, T. M. Yue and H. C. Man, Materials Science and Technology 18 (2002) 575.10.1179/026708302225001705 ↗
15. T. M. Yue, PhD thesis, Southampton University (1987).
16. P. J. E. Forsyth, Materials Science and Technology 11 (1995) 1025.10.1179/mst.1995.11.10.1025 ↗
17. C. M. Liao, J. M. Olive, M. Gao and R. P. Wei, Corrosion 54(6) (1998) 451.10.5006/1.3284873 ↗
18. P. Mazal, J. StuchlÍk and I. Dlouh Ý, in Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Federation for Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering (Florence, Italy, October, 1998) p. 91.
19. B. Skallerud, T. Iveland and G. Harkegard, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 44(6) (1993) 857.10.1016/0013-7944(93)90108-5 ↗
20. M. J. Couper, A. E. Neeson and J. R. Griffiths, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 13(3) (1990) 213.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1990.tb00594.x ↗
21. J.-Y. BuffÌere, S. Savelli, P. H. Jouneau, E. Maire and R. FougÈres, Mat. Sci. and Eng. A 316 (2001) 115.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01225-4 ↗
22. A. Eftekhari, J. E. Talia and P. K. Mazumdar, ibid. 199(2) (1995) 3.10.1016/0921-5093(95)09805-4 ↗
23. E. S. J. Filho, E. R. B. Jesus, A. P. H. Andrade and J. L. Rossi, Key Engineering Materials 189–191 (2001) 522.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.189-191.522 ↗
24. W. J. D. Shaw, X. Zhu and R. Derry, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fatigue and Fatigue Thresholds: Fatigue 93 (Montreal, Canada, 3–7 May, 1993) Vol. 2, p. 699.
25. E. J. Dolley, B. Lee and R. P. Wei, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 23(7) (2000) 555.10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00323.x ↗
26. P. J. E. Forsyth, Int. J. Fatigue 5(1) (1983) 3.10.1016/0142-1123(83)90002-6 ↗