Effect of aluminum substitution on microstructure and magnetic properties of electrospun BaFe12O19 nanofibers
Source abstract
Abstract
BaFe12−x Al x O19 nanofibers (x = 0–2.0) with average diameter 110 nm have been prepared via the electrospinning and subsequent heat treatment at 1100 °C for 2 h. Individual BaFe12O19 nanofibers were composed of numerous nanocrystallites stacking alternatively along the long axis of fiber and the single crystallites on each nanofibers had random orientations. With increasing Al3+ ions substitution contents from 0 to 2.0, the diameter and morphology of nanofibers were almost no change. However, the lattice parameters decreased due to Fe3+ ions substituted by smaller Al3+ ions and the average grain size calculated by the Scherrer’s equation reduced from 47 to 42 nm. The crystallites possessed a hexagonal plate-like shape at x = 0 while they became rod-like with various Al3+ ions substitution. The X-ray diffraction patterns show that single-phase barium hexaferrite was formed when Al3+ ions substitution contents were less than and equal to 1.0, while other impurity phases were detected when they were more than 1.0. The chemical analysis shows that the element Al was all incorporated into the lattice of BaFe12O19 and evenly distributed throughout the BaFe12−x Al x O19 nanofibers. The magnetic testing shows that the saturation magnetization (M s) decreased obviously from 63.92 to 29.70 A m2/kg, while coercivity (H c) increased significantly from 288.2 to 740.7 kA/m with increasing Al3+ ions substitution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic properties of thin films · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghasemi A, Hossienpour A, Morisako A et al (2006) J Magn Magn Mater 302:429. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.00610.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.006 ↗
2. Mallick KK, Shepherd P, Green RJ (2007) J Euro Ceram Soc 27:2045. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.09810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.098 ↗
3. Mu GH, Chen N, Pan XF et al (2008) Mater Lett 63:840. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.07410.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.074 ↗
4. Kojima H (1982) In: Wohlfarth EP (ed) Ferromagnetic materials. North Holland, Amsterdam
5. Parkin Stuart SP, Hayashi M, Thomas L (2008) Science 320:190. doi: 10.1126/science.114579910.1126/science.1145799 ↗
6. Žužek Rožman K, Pečko D, Šturm S et al (2012) Mater Chem Phys 133:218. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.01310.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.013 ↗
7. Li YQ, Huang Y, Li Yan (2011) Appl Surf Sci 257:8974. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.07510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.075 ↗
8. Pullar RC, Appleton SG, Bhattacharya AK (1998) J Magn Magn Mater 186:326. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00107-310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00107-3 ↗
9. Pullar RC, Bhattacharya AK (2006) J Magn Magn Mater 300:490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.06.00110.1016/j.jmmm.2005.06.001 ↗
10. Song FZ, Shen XQ, Liu MQ, Xiang J (2010) Solid State Sci 12:1603. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.07.00710.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.07.007 ↗
11. Mou FZ, Guan JG, Sun ZG et al (2010) J Solid State Chem 183:736. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.01.01610.1016/j.jssc.2010.01.016 ↗
12. Li CJ, Wang B, Wang JN (2012) J Magn Magn Mater 324:1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.11.01610.1016/j.jmmm.2011.11.016 ↗
13. Zhang JL, Fu JC, Li FS et al (2012) ACS Nano 6:2273. doi: 10.1021/nn204342m10.1021/nn204342m ↗
14. Ounnunkad S (2006) Solid State Commun 138:472. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2006.03.02010.1016/j.ssc.2006.03.020 ↗
15. Liu Y, Drew Michael GB, Wang JP et al (2010) J Magn Magn Mater 322:366. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.09.06210.1016/j.jmmm.2009.09.062 ↗
16. Shirtcliffe NJ, Thompson S, O’Keefe ES et al (2007) Mater Res Bull 42:281. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.06.00110.1016/j.materresbull.2006.06.001 ↗
17. Liu Y, Drew Michael GB, Liu Y et al (2010) J Magn Magn Mater 322:3342. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.02210.1016/j.jmmm.2010.06.022 ↗
18. Atkinson R, Gerber R, Papakonstantinou P et al (1992) J Magn Magn Mater 104–107:1005. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(92)90462-W10.1016/0304-8853(92)90462-W ↗
19. Luo H, Rai BK, Mishra SR et al (2012) J Magn Magn Mater 324:2602. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.10610.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.106 ↗
20. Singhal S, Namgyal T, Singh J et al (2011) Ceram Int 37:1833. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.02.00110.1016/j.ceramint.2011.02.001 ↗
21. Liu Y, Drew Michael GB, Liu Y (2011) J Magn Magn Mater 323:945. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.07510.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.075 ↗
22. Skomski R (2003) J Phys Condens Matter 15:R841. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/15/20/20210.1088/0953-8984/15/20/202 ↗
23. Rezlescu L, Rezlescu E, Popa PD et al (1999) J Magn Magn Mater 193:288. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00442-910.1016/S0304-8853(98)00442-9 ↗
24. Mali A, Ataie A (2005) Scripta Mater 53:1065. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.03710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.037 ↗
25. Liu Y, Drew Michael GB, Liu Y et al (2010) J Magn Magn Mater 322:814. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.11.00910.1016/j.jmmm.2009.11.009 ↗
26. Liu MQ, Shen XQ, Song FZ et al (2011) J Solid State Chem 184:871. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.02.01010.1016/j.jssc.2011.02.010 ↗
27. Qiu JX, Zhang QG, Gu MY (2005) J Appl Phys 98:5. doi: 10.1063/1.2135412
28. Shanker R (1990) J Mater Sci 25:2465. doi: 10.1007/BF0063804310.1007/BF00638043 ↗
29. Kazin PE, Trusov LA, Zaitsev DD et al (2008) J Magn Magn Mater 320:1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.10.02010.1016/j.jmmm.2007.10.020 ↗
30. Tsuzuki A, Kani K, Watari K et al (1992) J Mater Sci Lett 11:893. doi: 10.1007/bf0073049910.1007/BF00730499 ↗
31. Yue ZY, Zhong MJ, Ma HL et al (2008) J Shanghai Univ 12:216. doi: 10.1007/s11741-008-0306-110.1007/s11741-008-0306-1 ↗
32. Dhage Vinod N, Mane ML, Keche AP (2011) Phys B 406:789. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2010.11.09410.1016/j.physb.2010.11.094 ↗