Corrosion characteristics of a selective laser melted Co–Cr dental alloy under physiological conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the corrosion behavior of a dental cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) alloy fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) under conditions simulating the oral environment. Specimens were fabricated using either SLM or traditional casting methods. Microstructure and surface characteristics were evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. In addition, sample corrosion characteristics were assessed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Large microstructural differences were observed between SLM and traditional cast samples, with SLM exhibiting a more compact and homogeneous microstructure. The SLM samples also exhibited a slightly thicker surface oxide layer in comparison to traditional cast samples. In artificial saliva at pH 5, no differences were observed in the electrochemical corrosion properties or XPS surface characteristics of SLM and traditional cast specimens. However, in artificial saliva at pH 2.5, significant differences in electrochemical corrosion properties were observed, with SLM specimens exhibiting more corrosion resistance in comparison to traditional cast samples. The enhanced corrosion resistance of SLM samples in an acidic environment provides further support for their use in dental applications, where the oral environment can become temporarily acidic after meals.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Hao L, Dadbakhsh S, Seaman O et al (2009) J Mater Process Tech 209(17,19):579310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.06.012 ↗
2. Stamp PR, Fox W, O’Neill E, Sutcliffe JC (2009) J Mater Sci 20(9):1839. doi: 10.1007/s10856-009-3763-8
3. Kozo O, Masanori S (2006) Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46(11):118810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.024 ↗
4. Yadroitsev Ph, Bertrand IS (2007) Appl Surf Sci 253(19):806410.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.088 ↗
5. Yves-Christian H, Jan W, Wilhelmm M et al (2010) Phys Procedia 5(2):58710.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.086 ↗
6. Gebhardt A, Schmidt F-M, Hötter Jan-Steffen et al (2010) Physics Procedia 5:54310.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.082 ↗
7. Upadhyay D, Panchal MA, Dubey RS et al (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 432(1–2):110.1016/j.msea.2006.05.003 ↗
8. Hryniewicz T, Rokicki R, Rokosz K (2008) Mater Lett 62(1718):307310.1016/j.matlet.2008.01.130 ↗
9. Viswanathan SSAJI, Han-Cheol CHOE (2009) Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 19(4):78510.1016/S1003-6326(08)60350-7 ↗
10. Wylie CM, Shelton RM, Fleming GJP et al (2007) Dent Mater 23(6):71410.1016/j.dental.2006.06.011 ↗
11. Qiu J, Yu WQ, Zhang FQ et al (2011) Eur J Oral Sci 119(1):9310.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00791.x ↗
12. Qiu J, Yu WQ, Zhang FQ (2011) J Mater Sci 46(5):1359. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4927-010.1007/s10853-010-4927-0 ↗
13. Ameer MA, Khamis E (2004) Corros Sci 46(11):282510.1016/j.corsci.2004.03.011 ↗
14. Hanawa T, Hiromoto S, Asami K (2001) Appl Surf Sci 183(1–2):6810.1016/S0169-4332(01)00551-7 ↗
15. Muñoz AI, Julián LC (2010) Electrochim Acta 55(19):542810.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.093 ↗
16. Hodgson AWE, Kure S, Virtanen S et al (2004) Electrochim Acta 49(13):2167–217810.1016/j.electacta.2003.12.043 ↗
17. Kocijan A, Milosev I, Pihlar B (2004) J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(6):64310.1023/B:JMSM.0000030204.08616.3d ↗
18. Mareci D, Chelariu R, Gordin D-M et al (2009) Acta Biomater 5(9):362510.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.037 ↗
19. Altun H, Sen S (2004) Mater Design 25(7):63710.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.002 ↗
20. Zhao M-C, Liu M, Song G-L et al (2008) Corros Sci 50(11):316810.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.023 ↗
21. Hsu RW-W, Yang C-C, Huang C-A et al (2005) Mater Chem Phys 93(2–3):53110.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.04.007 ↗
22. Igual Mun˜oz A, Mischler S (2011) J Mater Sci 22(3):437. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4224-0
23. Liu R, Xi SQ, Kapoor S, Wu XJ (2010) J Mater Sci 22(45):6225. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4717-810.1007/s10853-010-4717-8 ↗
24. Pascal C, Thomazic A, Antoni-Zdziobek A et al (2012) J Mater Sci 4(47):1875. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5976-810.1007/s10853-011-5976-8 ↗