Implementation of functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes on magnetorheological elastomer
Source abstract
Abstract
This work studies the effects of loading various functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes (carboxyl, –COOH-MWCNTs) on the morphological and the field-dependent rheological properties of magnetorheological elastomers (MREs). A new type of MRE, which is reinforced by various loading from 0 to 1.5 wt% of COOH-MWCNT, is fabricated and experimentally investigated. The morphology of COOH-MWCNT and MRE with COOH-MWCNTs is characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results indicate that the COOH-MWCNTs are well embedded and dispersed randomly in the MRE structures. The rheological properties under different magnetic fields are evaluated using parallel plate rheometers. The influence of COOH-MWCNT content on the viscoelastic performance of the MRE is systematically investigated. It is found that when a higher content of COOH-MWCNT (up to 1.0 wt%) is added in the MRE, the MRE exhibits a higher MR effect of up to 17.5%. It is also shown that COOH-MWCNT acts as a reinforcing agent that leads to an enhancement in MR performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Mazlan SA (2008) The behaviour of magnetorheological fluids in squeeze mode. Dublin City University, Dublin
2. Yunus NA, Mazlan SA, Ubaidillah et al (2016) Rheological properties of isotropic magnetorheological elastomers featuring an epoxidized natural rubber. Smart Mater Struct 25:107001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10700110.1088/0964-1726/25/10/107001 ↗
3. Mohamad N, Mazlan SA, Ubaidillah (2016) Effect of carbonyl iron particles composition on the physical characteristics of MR grease. p 4002710.1063/1.4943470 ↗
4. Ubaidillah, Imaduddin F, Li YC et al (2016) A new class of magnetorheological elastomers based on waste tire rubber and the characterization of their properties. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11500210.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115002 ↗
5. Zhang W, Gong XL, Xuan SH, Xu YG (2010) High-performance hybrid magnetorheological materials: preparation and mechanical properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:12471–12476. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101904f10.1021/ie101904f ↗
6. Li W, Zhang X (2008) Research and applications of MR elastomers. Recent Patents Mech Eng 1:161–166. https://doi.org/10.2174/221279761080103016110.2174/2212797610801030161 ↗
7. Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics 10:555–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-110.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-1 ↗
8. Jolly MR, Carlson JD, Muñoz BC (1996) A model of the behaviour of magnetorheological materials. Smart Mater Struct 5:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/00910.1088/0964-1726/5/5/009 ↗
9. Yu M, Fu J, Ju BX et al (2013) Influence of x-ray radiation on the properties of magnetorheological elastomers. Smart Mater Struct 22:125010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12501010.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125010 ↗
10. Kavlicoglu BM, Gordaninejad F, Wang X (2013) Study of a magnetorheological grease clutch. Smart Mater Struct 22:125030. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12503010.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125030 ↗
11. Boczkowska A, Awietjan SF (2009) Urethane magnetorheological elastomers—manufacturing, microstructure and properties. Solid State Phenom 154:107–112. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.154.10710.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.154.107 ↗
12. Chertovich A, Stepanov G, Kramarenko E, Khokhlov A (2010) New composite elastomers with giant magnetic response. Macromol Mater Eng 295:336–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20090030110.1002/mame.200900301 ↗
13. Jiang W, Yao J, Gong X, Chen L (2008) Enhancement in magnetorheological effect of magnetorheological elastomers by surface modification of iron particles. Chin J Chem Phys 21:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-0068/21/01/87-9210.1088/1674-0068/21/01/87-92 ↗
14. Agirre-Olabide I, Elejabarrieta MJ, Bou-Ali MM (2015) Matrix dependence of the linear viscoelastic region in magnetorheological elastomers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26:1880–1886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1558065810.1177/1045389X15580658 ↗
15. Zhu J, Xu Z, Guo Y (2013) Experimental and modeling study on magnetorheological elastomers with different matrices. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1762–1771. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000072710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000727 ↗
16. Khimi SR, Pickering KL (2015) Comparison of dynamic properties of magnetorheological elastomers with existing antivibration rubbers. Compos Part B Eng 83:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.033 ↗
17. Pickering KL, Raa Khimi S, Ilanko S (2015) The effect of silane coupling agent on iron sand for use in magnetorheological elastomers part 1: surface chemical modification and characterization. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 68:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.005 ↗
18. Sui G, Zhong WH, Yang XP et al (2008) Preparation and properties of natural rubber composites reinforced with pretreated carbon nanotubes. Polym Adv Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.116310.1002/pat.1163 ↗
19. Damiani R (2014) Interface control and viscoelastic behavior of magnetorheological nanocomposites. University of California, Berkeley
20. Ge L, Gong X, Fan Y, Xuan S (2013) Preparation and mechanical properties of the magnetorheological elastomer based on natural rubber/rosin glycerin hybrid matrix. Smart Mater Struct 22:115029. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/11/11502910.1088/0964-1726/22/11/115029 ↗
21. Chen L, Gong X, Jiang W et al (2007) Investigation on magnetorheological elastomers based on natural rubber. J Mater Sci 42:5483–5489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0975-x10.1007/s10853-006-0975-x ↗
22. Ahmad Khairi MH, Mazlan SA, Ubaidillah et al (2017) The field-dependent complex modulus of magnetorheological elastomers consisting of sucrose acetate isobutyrate ester. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28:1993–2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1668284410.1177/1045389X16682844 ↗
23. Wang Y, Zhang X, Oh J, Chung K (2015) Fabrication and properties of magnetorheological elastomers based on CR/ENR self-crosslinking blends. Smart Mater Struct 24:95006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/9/09500610.1088/0964-1726/24/9/095006 ↗
24. Sorokin VV, Ecker E, Stepanov GV et al (2014) Experimental study of the magnetic field enhanced Payne effect in magnetorheological elastomers. Soft Matter 10:8765–8776. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM01738B10.1039/C4SM01738B ↗
25. Wu J, Gong X, Fan Y, Xia H (2010) Anisotropic polyurethane magnetorheological elastomer prepared through in situ polycondensation under a magnetic field. Smart Mater Struct 19:105007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/10500710.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105007 ↗
26. Zhou Y, Jerrams S, Betts A, et al (2013) The effect of microstructure on the dynamic equi- biaxial fatigue behaviour of magnetorheological elastomers. In: 8th European conference on constitutive models for rubbers (ECCMR VIII). pp 25–2810.1201/b14964-124 ↗
27. Koo J-H, Dawson A, Jung H-J (2012) Characterization of actuation properties of magnetorheological elastomers with embedded hard magnetic particles. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23:1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1243963510.1177/1045389X12439635 ↗
28. Li GH, Huang XG, Gu XY, Wang J (2013) Fabrication and mechanical properties study of the magnetorheological elastomer. Appl Mech Mater 376:148–152. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.376.14810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.376.148 ↗
29. Ubaidillah, Sutrisno J, Purwanto A, Mazlan SA (2015) Recent progress on magnetorheological solids: materials, fabrication, testing, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 17:563–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20140025810.1002/adem.201400258 ↗
30. Li Y, Li J, Li W, Du H (2014) A state-of-the-art review on magnetorheological elastomer devices. Smart Mater Struct 23:123001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12300110.1088/0964-1726/23/12/123001 ↗
31. Aloui S, Klüppel M (2015) Magneto-rheological response of elastomer composites with hybrid-magnetic fillers. Smart Mater Struct 24:25016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02501610.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025016 ↗
32. Li Y, Li J, Li W, Samali B (2013) Development and characterization of a magnetorheological elastomer based adaptive seismic isolator. Smart Mater Struct 22:35005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/3/03500510.1088/0964-1726/22/3/035005 ↗
33. Chen L, Gong XL, Li WH (2008) Effect of carbon black on the mechanical performances of magnetorheological elastomers. Polym Test 27:340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.003 ↗
34. Yu M, Zhu M, Fu J et al (2015) A dimorphic magnetorheological elastomer incorporated with Fe nano-flakes modified carbonyl iron particles: preparation and characterization. Smart Mater Struct 24:115021. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/11502110.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115021 ↗
35. Padalka O, Song HJ, Wereley NM et al (2010) Stiffness and damping in Fe Co, and Ni nanowire-based magnetorheological elastomeric composites. IEEE Trans Magn 46:2275–2277. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.204475910.1109/TMAG.2010.2044759 ↗
36. Li R, Sun LZ (2014) Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube-reinforced magnetorheological (MR) nanocomposites. J Nanomech Micromech 4:A4013014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.000006510.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000065 ↗
37. Li R, Sun LZ (2011) Dynamic mechanical behavior of magnetorheological nanocomposites filled with carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 99:131912. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364562710.1063/1.3645627 ↗
38. Bica I, Anitas EM, Bunoiu M et al (2014) Hybrid magnetorheological elastomer: influence of magnetic field and compression pressure on its electrical conductivity. J Ind Eng Chem 20:3994–3999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.10210.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.102 ↗
39. Landa RA, Soledad Antonel P, Ruiz MM et al (2013) Magnetic and elastic anisotropy in magnetorheological elastomers using nickel-based nanoparticles and nanochains. J Appl Phys 114:213912. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.483973510.1063/1.4839735 ↗
40. Aziz SAA, Mazlan SA, Ismail NIN et al (2016) Effects of multiwall carbon nanotubes on viscoelastic properties of magnetorheological elastomers. Smart Mater Struct 25:77001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/07700110.1088/0964-1726/25/7/077001 ↗
41. Abdullateef AA, Thomas SP, Al-Harthi MA et al (2012) Natural rubber nanocomposites with functionalized carbon nanotubes: mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and morphology studies. J Appl Polym Sci 125:E76–E84. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3502110.1002/app.35021 ↗
42. Petriccione A, Zarrelli M, Antonucci V, Giordano M (2014) Aggregates of chemically functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as viscosity reducers. Materials (Basel) 7:3251–3261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma704325110.3390/ma7043251 ↗
43. Qiu L, Chen Y, Yang Y et al (2013) A study of surface modifications of carbon nanotubes on the properties of polyamide 66/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. J Nanomater 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/25241710.1155/2013/252417 ↗
44. Kong I, Ahmad SH, Shanks R (2016) Properties enhancement in multiwalled carbon nanotube-magnetite hybrid-filled polypropylene natural rubber nanocomposites through functionalization and processing methods. Sci Eng Compos Mater 23:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2014-012410.1515/secm-2014-0124 ↗
45. Silva VA, de Folgueras LC, Cândido GM et al (2013) Nanostructured composites based on carbon nanotubes and epoxy resin for use as radar absorbing materials. Mater Res 16:1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-1439201300500014610.1590/S1516-14392013005000146 ↗
46. Abdul Aziz SA, Mazlan SA, Nik Ismail NI et al (2017) An enhancement of mechanical and rheological properties of magnetorheological elastomer with multiwall carbon nanotubes. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1770521110.1177/1045389X17705211 ↗
47. Ondreas F, Jancar J (2015) Temperature, frequency, and small static stress dependence of the molecular mobility in deformed amorphous polymers near their glass transition. Macromolecules 48:4702–4716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0055010.1021/acs.macromol.5b00550 ↗
48. Zhang H, Wei Y, Kang Z et al (2017) Influence of partial substitution for CB with MWNTs on performance of CB-filled NR composites. Micro Nano Lett 12:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2016.000310.1049/mnl.2016.0003 ↗
49. Jung HS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ et al (2016) Magnetic carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheology. Compos Struct 136:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.008 ↗
50. Subramaniam K, Das A, Steinhauser D et al (2011) Effect of ionic liquid on dielectric, mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polychloroprene rubber composites. Eur Polym J 47:2234–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.09.02110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.09.021 ↗
51. Michler GH, von Schmeling H-HK-B (2013) The physics and micro-mechanics of nano-voids and nano-particles in polymer combinations. Polymer (Guildf) 54:3131–3144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.03510.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.035 ↗
52. Ahmadi M, Shojaei A (2015) Reinforcing mechanisms of carbon nanotubes and high structure carbon black in natural rubber/styrene-butadiene rubber blend prepared by mechanical mixing—effect of bound rubber. Polym Int 64:1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.496410.1002/pi.4964 ↗
53. Hong CH, Kim MW, Zhang WL et al (2016) Fabrication of smart magnetite/reduced graphene oxide composite nanoparticles and their magnetic stimuli-response. J Colloid Interface Sci 481:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.06010.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.060 ↗
54. Mordina B, Tiwari RK, Setua DK, Sharma A (2016) Impact of graphene oxide on the magnetorheological behaviour of BaFe12 O19 nanoparticles filled polyacrylamide hydrogel. Polymer (Guildf) 97:258–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.02610.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.026 ↗
55. Ismail H, Ramly AF, Othman N (2011) The effect of carbon black/multiwall carbon nanotube hybrid fillers on the properties of natural rubber nanocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 50:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2010.55138010.1080/03602559.2010.551380 ↗