journal article·2016-09

Properties and micro-morphology of primary quinoline insoluble and mesocarbon microbeads

Ya-ming Zhu, Xue-fei Zhao, Li-juan Gao, Lv Jun, Jun-xia Cheng, Shi-quan Lai

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB-1 and MCMB-2) were prepared by the thermal polymerization of medium coal tar pitch at the different atmosphere conditions. Primary quinoline insoluble (QI) was separated from medium coal tar pitch by extraction using the quinoline as the solvent. The distribution of diameter of QI and MCMBs were determined by Laser Particle Size Analyzer. FTIR combined with curve-fitted method, SEM and TEM have been used to study the difference of property and micro-morphology of QI and MCMBs. The thermo-stability has been characterized by TG/DTG analysis. The relationship between the content of ideal graphite carbon (I g) and carbonization temperature of QI and MCMBs was researched by XRD analysis and curve-fitted method. The I g and carbonization temperature of QI and MCMBs shows a good linear relationship.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Burchell TD (1999) Carbon materials for advanced technologies. Pergamon, New York
2. Mora E, Santamaría R, Blanco C, Granda M, Menéndez R (2003) Mesophase development in petroleum and coal-tar pitches and their blends. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 68–69:409–42410.1016/S0165-2370(03)00034-2 ↗
3. Gray RJ, Krupinski KC (1997) In: Marsh H, Heintz EA, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (eds) Introduction to carbon technologies (chapter 7). Universidad Alicante, Alicante, p 329
4. Ramjee S, Rand B, Focke WW (2015) Low shear rheological behaviour of two-phase mesophase pitch. Carbon 82:368–38010.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.082 ↗
5. Bhatia G, Fitzer E, Kompalik D (1986) Mesophase formation in defined mixtures of coal tar pitch fractions. Carbon 24:489–49410.1016/0008-6223(86)90273-3 ↗
6. Sun Q, Wang BC, Zhang HP, Li XL, Bai YB (2011) The influence of a magnetic field during carbonization on the microstructure and electrical conductivity of needle cokes. New Carbon Mater 26:429–434
7. Li GN, Peng YL, Song SL, Song SL, Shi XX, Wu JJ, Xie JX, Zhou M, Hu GZ (2012) Obtaining needle coke from coal liquefaction residue. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 48:349–35510.1007/s10553-012-0379-3 ↗
8. Mochida I, Yoon SH, Takano N, Fortin F, Korai Y, Yokogawa K (1996) Microstructure of mesophase pitch-based carbon fiber and its control. Carbon 34:941–95610.1016/0008-6223(95)00172-7 ↗
9. Yu BJ, Wang CY, Chen MM, Zheng JM, Qi J (2012) Two-step chemical conversion of coal tar pitch to isotropic spinable pitch. Fuel Process Technol 104:155–15910.1016/j.fuproc.2012.05.007 ↗
10. Li TQ, Liu XJ, Wang CY, Wang H (2006) Structural characteristics of mesophase spheres prepared from coal tar pitch modified by phenolic resin. Chin J Chem. Eng. 14:660–66410.1016/S1004-9541(06)60131-6 ↗
11. Yang YS, Wang CY, Chen MM, Zheng JM (2011) The role of primary quinoline insoluble on the formation of mescarbon microbeads. Fuel Process Technol 92:154–15710.1016/j.fuproc.2010.08.024 ↗
12. Han YJ, Kim J, Yeo JS, An JC, Hong IP, Nakabayashi K, Miyawaki J, Jung JD, Jung SH, Yoon SH (2015) Coating of graphite anode with coal tar pitch as an effective precursor for enhancing the rate performance in Li-ion batteries: effects of composition and softening points of coal tar pitch. Carbon 94:432–43810.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.030 ↗
13. Aggarwal RK, Bhatia G, Bahl OP, Punjabi N (2000) Effect of calcination conditions of self-sintering mesocarbon microbeads on the characteristics of resulting graphite. J Mater Sci 35:5437–5442. doi: 10.1023/A:100487160175310.1023/A:1004871601753 ↗
14. Norfolk C, Kaufmann A, Mukasyan A, Varma A (2006) Processing of mesocarbon microbeads to high-performance materials: part III. High-temperature sintering and graphitization. Carbon 44:301–30610.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.019 ↗
15. Gao Y, Song HH, Chen XH (2003) Self-sinterability of mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB) for preparation of high-density isotropic carbon. J Mater Sci 38:2209–2213. doi: 10.1023/A:102374051726910.1023/A:1023740517269 ↗
16. Zhou CJ, McGinn PJ (2006) The effect of oxygen on the processing of mesocarbon microbeads to high-density carbon. Carbon 44:1673–168110.1016/j.carbon.2006.01.004 ↗
17. Imanishi N, Ono Y, Hanai K, Uchiyama R, Liu Y, Hirano A, Takeda Y, Yamamoto O (2008) Surface-modified meso-carbon microbeads anode for dry polymer lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 178:744–75010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.035 ↗
18. Hossain S, Kim YK, Saleh Y, Loutfy R (2003) Comparative studies of MCMB and C-C composite as anode for lithium-ion battery systems. J Power Sources 114:264–27610.1016/S0378-7753(02)00588-8 ↗
19. Shen K, Huang ZH, Shen WC, Yang JH, Yang GZ, Yu SY, Kang FY (2015) Homogenous and highly isotropic graphite produced from mesocarbon microbeads. Carbon 94:18–2610.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.034 ↗
20. Shen ZM, Xue RS (2003) Preparation of activated mesocarbon microbeads with high mesopore content. Fuel Process Technol 84:95–10310.1016/S0378-3820(03)00050-X ↗
21. Xue RS, Shen ZM (2003) Formation of graphite-potassium intercalation compounds during activation of MCMB with KOH. Carbon 41:1862–186410.1016/S0008-6223(03)00161-1 ↗
22. Li FH, Chi WD, Shen ZM, Wu YX, Liu YF, Liu H (2010) Activation of mesocarbon microbeads with different textures and their application for supercapacitor. Fuel Process Technol 91:17–2410.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.020 ↗
23. Liu ZJ, Guo QG, Song JR, Liu L (2007) Effect of Ti dopant on shrinkage and performance of MCMB-derived carbon laminations. Carbon 45:146–15110.1016/j.carbon.2006.07.013 ↗
24. Brooks JD, Taylor GH (1965) The formation of graphitizing carbons from the liquid phase. Carbon 3:185–18610.1016/0008-6223(65)90047-3 ↗
25. Bhatia G, Aggarwal RK, Punjabi N, Bahl OP (1994) Formation of mesophase spherules in low-QI coal tar pitches and development of monolithic carbons therefrom. J Mater Sci 29:4757–4763. doi: 10.1007/BF0035652010.1007/BF00356520 ↗
26. Tillmanns H, Pietzka G, Pauls H (1978) Influence of the quinoline-insoluble matter in pitch on carbonization behaviour and structure of pitch coke. Fuel 57:171–17310.1016/0016-2361(78)90070-4 ↗
27. Li TQ, Wang CY (2005) The formation mechanism of carbonaceous mesophase. New Carbon Mater 20:278–285
28. Miura K, Mae K, Li W, Kusakawa T, Morozumi F, Kumano A (2001) Estimation of hydrogen bond distribution in coal through the analysis of OH stretching bands in diffuse reflectance infrared spectrum measured by in situ technique. Energy Fuels 15:599–61010.1021/ef0001787 ↗
29. Painter PC, Sobkowiak M, Youtcheff J (1987) FT-IR study of hydrogen bonding in coal. Fuel 66:973–97810.1016/0016-2361(87)90338-3 ↗
30. Miura K, Mae K, Morozumi FA (1997) A new method estimate hydrogen bondings in coal by utilizing FTIR and DSC. Prepr Pap Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 42:209–213
31. Ibarra J, Muñoz E, Moliner R (1996) FTIR study of the evolution of coal structure during the coalification process. Org Geochem 24:725–73510.1016/0146-6380(96)00063-0 ↗
32. Manoj B, Kunjomana AG (2012) Study of stacking structure of amorphous carbon by X-ray diffraction technique. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:3127–313410.1016/S1452-3981(23)13940-X ↗