Enhanced superplasticity of magnesium alloy AZ31 obtained through equal-channel angular pressing with back-pressure
Source abstract
Abstract
Excellent superplastic elongations (in excess of 1,200%) were achieved in a commercial cast AZ31 alloy processed by low temperature equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) with a back-pressure to produce a bimodal grain structure. In contrast, AZ31 alloy processed by ECAP at temperatures higher than 200 °C showed a reasonably uniform grain structure and relatively low ductility. It is suggested that a bimodal grain structure is advantageous because the larger grains contribute to strain hardening thus delaying the onset of necking, while grain boundary sliding associated with small grains provides a stabilizing effect due to enhanced strain rate sensitivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Watanabe H, Tsutsui H, Mukai T et al (2000) Mater Sci Forum 350:17110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.350-351.171 ↗
2. Wu X, Liu Y, Hao H (2001) Mater Sci Forum 357–359:36310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.357-359.363 ↗
3. Watanabe H, Tsutsui H, Mukai T et al (2001) Int J Plast 17(3):387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00042-510.1016/S0749-6419(00)00042-5 ↗
4. Lin HK, Huang JC (2002) Mater Trans 43(10):2424. doi:https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.242410.2320/matertrans.43.2424 ↗
5. Bussiba A, Artzy AB, Shtechman A et al (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 302(1):56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01354-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01354-X ↗
6. Watanabe H, Mukai T, Ishikawa K et al (1999) Keikinzoku/J Jpn Inst Light Metals 49(8):401 (in Japanese)10.2464/jilm.49.401 ↗
7. Chuvil′deev VN, Kopylov VI, Gryaznov MY et al (2003) Doklady Akademii Nauk 391(1):47 (in Russian)
8. Mukai T, Yamanoi M, Watanabe H et al (2001) Scripta Mater 45(1):89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00996-410.1016/S1359-6462(01)00996-4 ↗
9. Lin HK, Huang JC et al (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 402(1–2):250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.01010.1016/j.msea.2005.04.018 ↗
10. Agnew SR, Stoica GM, Chen LJ et al (2002) In: Zhu YT et al (eds) Ultrafine grained materials II. TMS annual meeting, pp 643
11. Kim WJ, Chung SW, Chung CS et al (2001) Acta Mater 49:3337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00008-810.1016/S1359-6454(01)00008-8 ↗
12. Yi SB, Zaefferer S, Brokmeier H-G (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 424:275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.02210.1016/j.msea.2006.03.022 ↗
13. Tan JC, Tan MJ (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 339:81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00097-710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00097-7 ↗
14. Yin DL, Zhang KF, Wang GF et al (2005) Mater Lett 59:1714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.05310.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.053 ↗
15. Lapovok R, Estrin Y, Popov MV et al (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10(5):42910.1002/adem.200700363 ↗
16. Lapovok R, Thomson PF, Cottam R et al (2005) J Mater Sci 40(7):1699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-0672-110.1007/s10853-005-0672-1 ↗
17. Lapovok R, Thomson PF, Cottam R et al (2005) J Mater Res 20:1375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2005.018010.1557/JMR.2005.0180 ↗