journal article·2011-07

Multi-length scale computational derivation of Kevlar® yarn-level material model

M. Grujicic, P. S. Glomski, B. Pandurangan, W. C. Bell, C-F. Yen, B. A. Cheeseman

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The results of an extensive set of molecular-level computational analyses regarding the role of various microstructural/morphological defects on the Kevlar® fiber mechanical properties are used to upgrade the associated yarn-level model of the same material. While carrying out this analysis, the hierarchical multi-scale (atoms/ions—molecular chains—fibrils—fibers—yarn) of the problem was taken into account. To construct various defects, the appropriate open-literature experimental and computational results were used while the concentration of defects was set to the values comparable with their counterparts observed under “prototypical” polymers synthesis and fiber fabrication conditions. Due to the stochastic nature of the defect distributions, their effect on the yarn-level strength and ductility are included in the form of the corresponding two-level Weibull distribution. As far as the material stiffness is concerned, it was assumed that the first-order effect of the defects is to change the mean value of the stiffness parameters and that this effect is of a deterministic character. While upgrading the yarn-level material model for Kevlar® it was recognized that a yarn is an assembly of nearly parallel fibers (often lightly twisted, or tied with wrap-around filaments) with relatively weak lateral coupling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Grujicic M, Bell WC, Glomski PS, Pandurangan B, Yen C-F, Cheeseman BA (2010) J Mater Eng Perform. doi: 10.1007/s11665-010-9786-y10.1007/s11665-010-9786-y ↗
2. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Koudela KL, Cheeseman BA (2006) Appl Surf Sci 253:73010.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.016 ↗
3. Grujicic M, He T, Marvi H, Cheeseman BA, Yen C-F (2010) J Mater Sci 45(12):3136. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4290-110.1007/s10853-010-4290-1 ↗
4. Grujicic M, Angstadt DC, Sun Y-P, Koudela KL (2007) J Mater Sci 42:4609. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0520-y10.1007/s10853-006-0520-y ↗
5. Grujicic M, Arakere G, He T, Gogulapati M, Cheeseman BA (2008) J Mater 222:259
6. Grujicic M, Bell WC, Arakere G, He T, Xie X, Cheeseman BA (2010) J Mater Eng Perform 19–1:2210.1007/s11665-009-9419-5 ↗
7. Grujicic M, Bell WC, He T, Cheeseman BA (2008) J Mater Sci 43:6301. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2893-610.1007/s10853-008-2893-6 ↗
8. Cheeseman BA, Yen CF, Scott BR, Powers B, Bogetti TA, LaMatina B, Duan Y, Keefe M, Miao Y, Wang Y (2006) ARL Report ADM002075
9. Lee SM (1993) Handbook of composite reinforcements. John Wiley and Sons, New York ISBN: 978-0-471-18861-2
10. Rutledge GC, Suter UW (1991) Macromolecules 24:1924
11. Chae HG, Kumar S (2008) Science 319:90810.1126/science.1153911 ↗
12. Gupta VB, Kothari VK (1997) Manufactured fiber technology. Chapman & Hall, New York10.1007/978-94-011-5854-1 ↗
13. Panar M, Avakian P, Blume RC, Gardner KH, Gierke TD, Yang HH (1983) J Polym Sci 21:1955
14. Kwolek SL (1972) US Patent 3,671,542
15. du Pont EI, Technical brochure (1983) Weight savings for aircraft using Kevlar aramid fiber
16. Blades H (1973) U.S. Patent 3,767,756
17. Blades H (1975) U.S. Patent 3,869,430
18. Materials Studio (2009) Visualizer manual. Accelrys Inc., Princeton
19. Materials Studio (2009) Amorphous cell theory manual. Accelrys Inc., Princeton
20. Sun H (1998) J Phys Chem B 102:733810.1021/jp980939v ↗
21. Sun H, Ren P, Fried JR (1998) Comput Theor Polym Sci 8(1/2):22910.1016/S1089-3156(98)00042-7 ↗
22. Materials Studio (2009) Discover theory manual. Accelrys Inc., Princeton
23. Yip S (1995) Handbook of materials modeling. Springer Publications, Berlin
24. Newell JA, Sagendorf MT (1999) High Perform Polym 11:29710.1088/0954-0083/11/3/305 ↗
25. Steenbakkers LW, Wagner HD (1988) J Mater Sci Lett 7(11):120910.1007/BF00722339 ↗
26. Knoff WF (1987) J Mater Sci 22:1024. doi: 10.1007/BF0110354610.1007/BF01103546 ↗
27. Grujicic M, Glomski PS, He T, Arakere G, Bell WC, Cheeseman BA (2009) J Mater Eng Perform 18(9):116910.1007/s11665-009-9370-5 ↗
28. Zhou G, Sun X, Wang Y (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:23910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00258-6 ↗
29. Miao Y, Zhou E, Wang Y, Cheeseman BA (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:167110.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.018 ↗
30. Grujicic M, Arakere G, Bell WC, Marvi H, Yalavarthy HV, Pandurangan B, Haque I, Fadel GM (2010) J Mater Eng Perform 19(3):30110.1007/s11665-009-9482-y ↗
31. Allen MP, Tildesley DL (eds) (1989) Computer simulation of liquids. Clarendon Press, New Ed Edition, Oxford10.1063/1.2810937 ↗