journal article·2013-09

An analysis of the microstructure and properties of cold-rolled Ni:Al laminate foils

A. K. Stover, N. M. Krywopusk, G. M. Fritz, S. C. Barron, J. D. Gibbins, T. P. Weihs

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Ni:Al laminate composites were fabricated by repeatedly cold-rolling Al and Ni foils that were stacked together with initial thicknesses of 25 and 18 μm, respectively. The rolling process consisted of multiple 50 % thickness reductions wherein the first reduction was followed by cutting, restacking, and rerolling to achieve a total of three, six or nine 50 % thickness reductions. However, some of the laminates also received a more mild series of six 20 % thickness reductions without restacking. An analysis program was written and used to quantify the distribution of layer thicknesses, bilayer thicknesses and local chemistries for the complex laminate microstructures, while also preserving positional information for the constituent layers. The resulting distributions show that while we see no clustering of very large bilayers in any of the composites, the heavily rolled laminates with only 50 % thickness reductions have a higher percentage of very large bilayers, relative to the volume mean bilayer, compared to laminates with the additional 20 % thickness reductions. This phenomenon is attributed to less uniform layer deformation and more layer pinch-off with 50 % thickness reductions compared to the more gradual 20 % thickness reductions. Differential scanning calorimetry was performed on the laminates to determine the exothermic peak temperatures and the total energy released during controlled heating. Peak temperatures correlate with the volume average bilayer thickness, while the energy release correlates with the bilayer thickness distribution. The velocity and maximum temperature of self-propagating reactions were measured for the laminates and were found to vary according to processing conditions but not according to the volume average bilayer thickness. Foils with 20 % thickness reductions have both hotter and faster reactions compared to samples with only 50 % thickness reductions. The distributions of layer thicknesses, bilayer thicknesses, and local chemistries within the laminates are used to predict the maximum temperature during reaction. The velocities of the unsteady reaction propagations, though, could not be predicted effectively, at least with current analytical models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Inoue J, Nambu S, Ishimoto Y, Koseki T (2008) Scripta Mater 59:105510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.020 ↗
2. Severin GE (1980) Body armor laminate. U.S. Patent 519,644
3. Weihs TP (1998) In: Handbook of thin film process technology. TOP, Bristol
4. Floro JA (1986) J Vac Sci Technol A Vac Surf Films 4:63110.1116/1.573848 ↗
5. Gavens AJ, Van Heerden D, Mann AB, Reiss ME, Weihs TP (2000) J Appl Phys 87:125510.1063/1.372005 ↗
6. Ma E, Thompson CV, Clevenger LA, Tu KN (1990) J Appl Phys Lett 57:126210.1063/1.103504 ↗
7. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Munir ZA (1989) J Appl Phys 66:503910.1063/1.343777 ↗
8. Wickersham CE (1988) J Vac Sci Technol A Vac Surf Films 6:169910.1116/1.575315 ↗
9. Dyer TS, Munir ZA, Ruth V (1994) Scr Metall Mater 30:128110.1016/0956-716X(94)90259-3 ↗
10. Reiss ME, Esber CM, Van Heerden D, Gavens AJ, Williams ME, Weihs TP (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 261:21710.1016/S0921-5093(98)01069-7 ↗
11. Arzt E (1998) Acta Mater 46:561110.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
12. Li Q, Anderson PM (2005) Acta Mater 53:112110.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.009 ↗
13. Salloum M, Knio OM (2010) Combust Flame 157:28810.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.019 ↗
14. Salloum M, Knio OM (2010) Combust Flame 157:43610.1016/j.combustflame.2009.08.010 ↗
15. Salloum M, Knio OM (2010) Combust Flame 157:115410.1016/j.combustflame.2009.10.005 ↗
16. Knepper R, Snyder MR, Fritz G, Fisher K, Knio OM, Weihs TP (2009) J Appl Phys 105:08350410.1063/1.3087490 ↗
17. Besnoin E, Cerutti S, Knio OM, Weihs TP (2002) J Appl Phys 92:547410.1063/1.1509840 ↗
18. Rogachev AS, Grigoryan AÉ, Illarionova EV, Kanel IG, Merzhanov AG, Nosyrev AN, Sachkova NV, Khvesyuk VI, Tsygankov PA (2004) Combust Explos Shock Waves 40:16610.1023/B:CESW.0000020138.58228.65 ↗
19. Hebert RJ, Perepezko JH (2004) Scripta Mater 50:80710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.047 ↗
20. Sieber H, Wilde G, Perepezko J (1999) J Non-Cryst Solids 250–252:61110.1016/S0022-3093(99)00142-8 ↗
21. Sieber H, Park JS, Weissmüller J, Perepezko JH (2001) Acta Mater 49:113910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00023-4 ↗
22. Saito Y, Utsunomiya H, Tsuji N, Sakai T (1999) Acta Mater 47:57910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-6 ↗
23. Eizadjou M, Kazemi Talachi A, Danesh Manesh H, Shakur Shahabi H, Janghorban K (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:200310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.029 ↗
24. Mozaffari A, Danesh Manesh H, Janghorban K (2010) J Alloy Compd 489:10310.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.022 ↗
25. Qiu X, Liu R, Guo S, Graeter JH, Kecskes L, Wang J (2009) Metall Mater Trans A 40:154110.1007/s11661-009-9840-2 ↗
26. Dreizin EL (2009) Prog Energy Combust Sci 35:14110.1016/j.pecs.2008.09.001 ↗
27. Bazyn T, Glumac N, Krier H, Ward TS, Schoenitz M, Dreizin EL (2007) Combust Sci Technol 179:45710.1080/00102200600637261 ↗
28. Badiola C, Schoenitz M, Zhu X, Dreizin EL (2009) J Alloy Compd 488:38610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.146 ↗
29. Stamatis D, Jiang X, Beloni E, Dreizin EL (2010) Propellants Explos Pyrotech 35:26010.1002/prep.200900009 ↗
30. Michaelsen C, Barmak K, Weihs TP (1997) J Phys D Appl Phys 30:316710.1088/0022-3727/30/23/001 ↗
31. Barron SC, Knepper R, Walker N, Weihs TP (2011) J Appl Phys 109:01351910.1063/1.3527925 ↗
32. McDonald JP, Hodges VC, Jones ED, Adams DP (2009) Appl Phys Lett 94:03410210.1063/1.3070119 ↗
33. Bordeaux F, Yavari R (1990) Z Metallkde 81:130
34. Dinda GP, Rösner H, Wilde G (2005) Scripta Mater 52:57710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.11.034 ↗
35. Mann AB, Gavens AJ, Reiss ME, Van Heerden D, Bao G, Weihs TP (1997) J Appl Phys 82:117810.1063/1.365886 ↗
36. Battezzati L, Pappalepore P, Durbiano F, Gallino I (1999) Acta Mater 47:190110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00040-3 ↗
37. Boer RF, Boom R, Mattens WCM, Miedema AR, Niessen AK (1988) In: Cohesion in metals. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam
38. Armstrong M, Koszykowski R (1990) In: Combustion and plasma synthesis of high-temperature materials. VCH, New York
39. Du Y (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 363:14010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00624-5 ↗
40. Gunduz IE, Fadenberger K, Kokonou M, Rebholz C, Doumanidis CC, Ando T (2009) J Appl Phys 105:07490310.1063/1.3091284 ↗
41. Makino A, Law CK (1992) In: Twenty-fourth symposium on combustion. The Combustion Institute, p 1883
42. Makino A, Law CK (1995) Combust Flame 101:55110.1016/0010-2180(95)00284-D ↗
43. Law CK (2006) Combust Sci Technol 178:33510.1080/00102200500290690 ↗
44. Hardt AP, Phung PV (1973) Combust Flame 21:7710.1016/0010-2180(73)90009-6 ↗
45. Atzmon M (1992) Metall Mater Trans A 23:4910.1007/BF02660850 ↗
46. Alawieh L, Knio OM, Weihs TP (2011) J Appl Phys 110:01350910.1063/1.3599847 ↗