journal article·2021-10Open access

Current and future trends of additive manufacturing for chemistry applications: a review

Oyekunle Azeez Alimi, Reinout Meijboom

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 30

Abstract

Organ-preservation surgery for early rectal cancer is an alternative treatment to conventional radical surgery that offers comparable oncological outcome but has lower morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of this strategy relies on accurate preoperative staging of mesorectal nodal metastasis which current staging modalities are unable to deliver. DNA methylation has a prognostic role in colorectal carcinogenesis and may select for tumours suitable for local excision, although this has not been explored in rectal cancer. \n \nA panel of staged rectal cancers was analysed for differential DNA methylation patterns. This identified a unique signature consisting of concomitant hypermethylation of three or more of APC, RARB, GSTP1, TIMP3, CASP8, DAPK1 and CXCL12 that was associated with histopathologically localised disease. Correlation of protein expression with clinicopathological features found UNC5C expression to be associated with nodal status. Genome-wide screening found >7000 differentially methylated genes between node-negative and node-positive rectal cancer. Validation was performed on a subset of these genes and this confirmed hypermethylation of SNAP25, SOX7 and TIAM1 to be associated with favourable histological indices. \n \nThis study has provided insight into the methylation patterns of rectal cancer and has identified novel prognostic biomarkers. Further work will determine their clinical usefulness in rectal cancer risk stratification. \n
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Genetic factors in colorectal cancer · Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Alvarez PJJ, Chan CK, Elimelech M, Halas NJ, Villagrán D (2018) Emerging opportunities for nanotechnology to enhance water security. Nat Nanotechnol 13:634–64110.1038/s41565-018-0203-2 ↗
2. Tijing LD, Dizon JRC, Ibrahim I, Nisay ARN, Shon HK, Advincula RC (2020) 3D printing for membrane separation, desalination and water treatment. Appl Mater Today 18:10048610.1016/j.apmt.2019.100486 ↗
3. Zhang Y, Sun X, Nomura N, Fujita T (2019) Hierarchical nanoporous copper architectures via 3D printing technique for highly efficient catalysts. Small 15:180543210.1002/smll.201805432 ↗
4. Macdonald NP, Currivan SA, Tedone L, Paull B (2017) Direct production of microstructured surfaces for planar chromatography using 3D printing. Anal Chem 89:2457–246310.1021/acs.analchem.6b04546 ↗
5. Zhang Y, Ge S, Yu J (2016) Trends in Analytical Chemistry Chemical and biochemical analysis on lab-on-a-chip devices fabricated using three-dimensional printing. Trends Anal Chem 85:166–18010.1016/j.trac.2016.09.008 ↗
6. Santana HS, Rodrigues AC, Lopes MGM, Russo FN, Silva JL Jr, Taranto OP (2020) 3D printed millireactors for process intensification. Chinese J Chem Eng 28:180–19010.1016/j.cjche.2018.12.013 ↗
7. Salentijn GIJ, Oomen PE, Grajewski M, Verpoorte E (2017) Fused deposition modeling 3D printing for (bio) analytical device fabrication: procedures, materials, and applications. Anal Chem 89:7053–706110.1021/acs.analchem.7b00828 ↗
8. Meng C, Ho B, Ng SH, Ho K, Li H, Yoon Y (2015) Lab Chip 15:3627–363710.1039/C5LC00132C ↗
9. Anderson KB, Lockwood SY, Martin RS, Spence DM (2013) A 3D printed fluidic device that enables integrated features. Anal Chem 85:5622–562610.1021/ac4009594 ↗
10. Rossi S, Porta R, Brenna D, Puglisi A, Benaglia M (2017) Stereoselective catalytic synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients in homemade 3D-printed mesoreactors. Angew Chemie 129:4354–435810.1002/ange.201612192 ↗
11. Liu C, Huang N, Xu F, Tong J, Chen Z, Gui X, Fu Y, Lao C (2018) 3D printing technologies for flexible tactile sensors toward wearable electronics and electronic skin. Polymers (Basel) 10:62910.3390/polym10060629 ↗
12. Melnikova R, Ehrmann A, Finsterbusch K (2014) 3D printing of textile-based structures by fused deposition modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. IOP publishing, p 1201810.1088/1757-899X/62/1/012018 ↗
13. Duarte LC, Chagas CLS, Ribeiro LEB, Coltro WKT (2017) Sensors and Actuators B: chemical 3D printing of microfluidic devices with embedded sensing electrodes for generating and measuring the size of microdroplets based on contactless conductivity detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 251:427–43210.1016/j.snb.2017.05.011 ↗
14. Kadimisetty K, Mosa IM, Malla S, Satterwhite-Warden JE, Kuhns TM, Faria RC, Lee NH, Rusling JF (2016) 3D-printed supercapacitor-powered electrochemiluminescent protein immunoarray. Biosens Bioelectron 77:188–19310.1016/j.bios.2015.09.017 ↗
15. Kitson PJ, Symes MD, Dragone V, Cronin L (2013) Combining 3D printing and liquid handling to produce user-friendly reactionware for chemical synthesis and purification. Chem Sci 4:3099–310310.1039/C3SC51253C ↗
16. Sharma M, Reddy SV, Kulkarni AA (2014) 3D flow reactors: flow, hydrodynamics, and performance. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:1916–192310.1021/ie402311y ↗
17. Saggiomo V (2020) 3D Printed devices for catalytic systems. Wiley, Catal immobil methods appl, pp 369–408
18. Ambrosi A, Pumera M (2016) 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chem Soc Rev 45:2740–275510.1039/C5CS00714C ↗
19. Lee W, Kwon D, Choi W, Jung GY, Au AK, Folch A, Jeon S (2015) 3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section. Sci Rep 5:771710.1038/srep07717 ↗
20. Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, Gu Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sun Z (2015) 3D printable graphene composite. Sci Rep 5:1118110.1038/srep11181 ↗
21. Wang Z, Wang J, Li M, Sun K, Liu C (2014) Three-dimensional printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene framework coated with Cu-BTC metal-organic frameworks for the removal of methylene blue. Sci Rep 4:593910.1038/srep05939 ↗
22. Kitson PJ, Glatzel S, Chen W, Lin CG, Song YF, Cronin L (2016) 3D printing of versatile reactionware for chemical synthesis. Nat Protoc 11:920–93610.1038/nprot.2016.041 ↗
23. Hussain SI. (2019) 3D printing has emerged to be one of the biggest inventions ever. Linkedin blog. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/3d-printing-has-emerged-one-biggestinventions-ever-shehroz-hussain/. Accessed 10 Aug 2021
24. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer
25. Baumann FW (2018) Thirty thousand 3D models from thingiverse. Data 3:510.3390/data3010005 ↗
26. Capel AJ, Rimington RP, Lewis MP, Christie SDR (2018) 3D printing for chemical, pharmaceutical and biological applications. Nat Rev Chem 2:422–43610.1038/s41570-018-0058-y ↗
27. Sule SS, Petsiuk AL, Pearce JM (2019) Open source completely 3-D printable centrifuge. Instruments 3:3010.3390/instruments3020030 ↗
28. Dhankani KC, Pearce JM (2017) Open source laboratory sample rotator mixer and shaker. HardwareX 1:1–1210.1016/j.ohx.2016.07.001 ↗
29. Trivedi DK, Pearce JM (2017) Open source 3-D printed nutating mixer. Appl Sci 7:94210.3390/app7090942 ↗
30. Cecil F, Zhang M, Guijt RM, Henderson A, Nesterenko PN, Paull B, Breadmore MC, Macka M (2017) 3D printed LED based on-capillary detector housing with integrated slit. Anal Chim Acta 965:131–13610.1016/j.aca.2017.02.020 ↗
31. Whitehead HD, Waldman JV, Wirth DM, LeBlanc G (2017) 3D printed UV–visible cuvette adapter for low-cost and versatile spectroscopic experiments. ACS Omega 2:6118–612210.1021/acsomega.7b01310 ↗
32. Scalfani VF, Vaid TP (2014) 3D printed molecules and extended solid models for teaching symmetry and point groups. J Chem Educ 91:1174–118010.1021/ed400887t ↗
33. Penny MR, Cao ZJ, Patel B, Sil dos Santos B, Asquith CRM, Szulc BR, Rao ZX, Muwaffak Z, Malkinson JP, Hilton ST (2017) Three-dimensional printing of a scalable molecular model and orbital kit for organic chemistry teaching and learning. J Chem Educ 94:1265–127110.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00953 ↗
34. Jones OAH, Spencer MJS (2018) A simplified method for the 3D printing of molecular models for chemical education. J Chem Educ 95:88–9610.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00533 ↗
35. Rossi S, Benaglia M, Brenna D, Porta R, Orlandi M (2015) Three dimensional (3D) printing: a straightforward, user-friendly protocol to convert virtual chemical models to real-life objects. J Chem Educ 8:1398–140110.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00168 ↗
36. Stone-Sundberg J, Kaminsky W, Snyder T, Moeck P (2015) 3D printed models of small and large molecules, structures and morphologies of crystals, as well as their anisotropic physical properties. Cryst Res Technol 50:432–44110.1002/crat.201400469 ↗
37. Wood PA, Sarjeant AA, Bruno IJ, Macrae CF, Maynard-Casely HE, Towler M (2017) The next dimension of structural science communication: simple 3D printing directly from a crystal structure. CrystEngComm 19:690–69810.1039/C6CE02412B ↗
38. Robertson MJ, Jorgensen WL (2015) Illustrating concepts in physical organic chemistry with 3D printed orbitals. J Chem Educ 92:2113–211610.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00682 ↗
39. Casas L, Estop E (2015) Virtual and printed 3D models for teaching crystal symmetry and point groups. J Chem Educ 92:1338–134310.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00147 ↗
40. He Y, Wu Y, Fu J, Gao Q, Qiu J (2016) Developments of 3D printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review. Electroanalysis 28:1658–167810.1002/elan.201600043 ↗
41. Wei Q, Li H, Liu G, He Y, Wang Y, Tan YE, Wang D, Peng X, Yang G, Tsubaki N (2020) Metal 3D printing technology for functional integration of catalytic system. Nat Commun 11:1–810.1038/s41467-020-17941-8 ↗
42. Chorkendorff I, Niemantsverdriet JW (2017) Concepts of modern catalysis and kinetics. Wiley
43. Tsao C-W (2016) Polymer microfluidics: simple, low-cost fabrication process bridging academic lab research to commercialised production. Micromachines 7:22510.3390/mi7120225 ↗
44. Hu X, Karnetzke J, Fassbender M, Drücker S, Bettermann S, Schroeter B, Pauer W, Moritz H-U, Fiedler B, Luinstra G (2020) Smart reactors–Combining stimuli-responsive hydrogels and 3D printing. Chem Eng J 387:12341310.1016/j.cej.2019.123413 ↗
45. Symes MD, Kitson PJ, Yan J, Richmond CJ, Cooper GJT, Bowman RW, Vilbrandt T, Cronin L (2012) Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. Nat Chem 4:34910.1038/nchem.1313 ↗
46. Manzano JS, Wang H, Slowing II (2019) High throughput screening of 3D printable resins: adjusting the surface and catalytic properties of multifunctional architectures. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:2890–289610.1021/acsapm.9b00598 ↗
47. Lahtinen E, Turunen L, Hänninen MM, Kolari K, Tuononen HM, Haukka M (2019) Fabrication of porous hydrogenation catalysts by a selective laser sintering 3D printing technique. ACS Omega 4:12012–1201710.1021/acsomega.9b00711 ↗
48. Harding MJ, Brady S, O’Connor H, Lopez-Rodriguez R, Edwards MD, Tracy S, Dowling D, Gibson G, Girard KP, Ferguson S (2020) 3D printing of PEEK reactors for flow chemistry and continuous chemical processing. React Chem Eng 5:728–73510.1039/C9RE00408D ↗
49. Anciaux SK, Geiger M, Bowser MT (2016) 3D printed micro free-flow electrophoresis device. Anal Chem 88:7675–768210.1021/acs.analchem.6b01573 ↗
50. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The role of additive manufacturing in the era of industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf 11:545–55410.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148 ↗
51. Kalsoom U, Nesterenko PN, Paull B (2018) Current and future impact of 3D printing on the separation sciences. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 105:492–50210.1016/j.trac.2018.06.006 ↗
52. Dávila JSM (2018) Customizable heterogeneous catalysts: from 3D printed designs to mesoporous materials. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. https://doi.org/10.2172/150517410.2172/1505174 ↗
53. Rao ZX, Patel B, Monaco A, Cao ZJ, Barniol-Xicota M, Pichon E, Ladlow M, Hilton ST (2017) 3D-printed polypropylene continuous-flow column reactors: exploration of reactor utility in SNAr reactions and the synthesis of bicyclic and tetracyclic heterocycles. European J Org Chem 2017:6499–650410.1002/ejoc.201701111 ↗
54. Neumaier JM, Madani A, Klein T, Ziegler T (2019) Low-budget 3D-printed equipment for continuous flow reactions. Beilstein J Org Chem 15:558–56610.3762/bjoc.15.50 ↗
55. Dragone V, Sans V, Rosnes MH, Kitson PJ, Cronin L (2013) 3D-printed devices for continuous-flow organic chemistry. Beilstein J Org Chem 9:951–95910.3762/bjoc.9.109 ↗
56. Capel AJ, Edmondson S, Christie SDR, Goodridge RD, Bibb RJ, Thurstans M (2013) Design and additive manufacture for flow chemistry. Lab Chip 13:4583–459010.1039/c3lc50844g ↗
57. Kitson PJ, Marie G, Francoia J-P, Zalesskiy SS, Sigerson RC, Mathieson JS, Cronin L (2018) Digitisation of multistep organic synthesis in reactionware for on-demand pharmaceuticals. Science 359:314–31910.1126/science.aao3466 ↗
58. Kitson PJ, Glatzel S, Cronin L (2016) The digital code driven autonomous synthesis of ibuprofen automated in a 3D-printer-based robot. Beilstein J Org Chem 12:2776–278310.3762/bjoc.12.276 ↗
59. Gromski PS, Granda JM, Cronin L (2020) Universal chemical synthesis and discovery with ‘the chemputer.’ Trends Chem 1:4–1210.1016/j.trechm.2019.07.004 ↗
60. Nathan S (2018) “Chemputer” may democratise pharmaceutical sector. The engineer. https://www.theengineer.co.uk/chemputer-synthesis-pharmaceuticals/. Accessed 10 Aug 2021
61. Angelone D, Hammer AJS, Rohrbach S, Krambeck S, Granda JM, Wolf J, Zalesskiy S, Chisholm G, Cronin L (2021) Convergence of multiple synthetic paradigms in a universally programmable chemical synthesis machine. Nat Chem 13:63–6910.1038/s41557-020-00596-9 ↗
62. Alimi OA, Bingwa N, Meijboom R (2019) Homemade 3-D printed flow reactors for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Eng Res Des 150:116–12910.1016/j.cherd.2019.07.024 ↗
63. Alimi OA, Akinnawo CA, Onisuru OR, Meijboom R (2020) 3-D printed microreactor for continuous flow oxidation of a flavonoid. J Flow Chem 10:517–53110.1007/s41981-020-00089-3 ↗
64. Alimi OA, Ncongwane TB, Meijboom R (2020) Design and fabrication of a monolith catalyst for continuous flow epoxidation of styrene in polypropylene printed flow reactor. Chem Eng Res Des 159:395–40910.1016/j.cherd.2020.04.025 ↗
65. Au AK, Lee W, Folch A (2014) Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 14:1294–130110.1039/C3LC51360B ↗
66. Zheng Q, Aiello A, Choi YS, Tarr K, Shen H, Durkin DP, Shuai D (2020) 3D Printed photoreactor with immobilized graphitic carbon nitride: a sustainable platform for solar water purification. J Hazard Mater 399:12309710.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123097 ↗
67. Su C-K, Peng P-J, Sun Y-C (2015) Fully 3D-printed preconcentrator for selective extraction of trace elements in seawater. Anal Chem 87:6945–695010.1021/acs.analchem.5b01599 ↗
68. Chaparro-Garnica CY, Jordá-Faus P, Bailón-García E, Ocampo-Pérez R, Aguilar-Madera CG, Davó-Quiñonero A, Lozano-Castelló D, Bueno-López A (2020) Customizable heterogeneous catalysts: nonchanneled advanced monolithic supports manufactured by 3D-Printing for improved active phase coating performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:54573–5458410.1021/acsami.0c14703 ↗
69. Garcia-Gonzalez D, Rusinek A, Jankowiak T, Arias A (2015) Mechanical impact behavior of polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK). Compos Struct 124:88–9910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.061 ↗
70. Valentan B, Kadivnik Ž, Brajlih T, Anderson A, Drstvenšek I (2013) Processing poly (ether etherketone) an a 3D printer for thermoplastic modelling. Mater Tehnol 47:715–721
71. Yang C, Tian X, Li D, Cao Y, Zhao F, Shi C (2017) Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Technol 248:1–710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
72. Menzel F, Klein T, Ziegler T, Neumaier J (2020) 3D-printed PEEK reactors and development of a complete continuous flow system for chemical synthesis. React Chem Eng 5:1300–131010.1039/D0RE00206B ↗
73. Singh V (2020) 3D-printed device for synthesis of magnetic and metallic nanoparticles. J Flow Chem 1:1–8
74. Soliman A, AlAmoodi N, Karanikolos GN, Doumanidis CC, Polychronopoulou K (2020) A review on new 3-D printed materials’ geometries for catalysis and adsorption: paradigms from reforming reactions and CO2 capture. Nanomaterials 10:219810.3390/nano10112198 ↗
75. Rossi S, Puglisi A, Raimondi LM, Benaglia M (2020) Stereolithography 3D-printed catalytically active devices in organic synthesis. Catalysts 10:10910.3390/catal10010109 ↗
76. Benaglia M, Puglisi A, Cozzi F (2003) Polymer-supported organic catalysts. Chem Rev 103:3401–343010.1021/cr010440o ↗
77. Li X, Su H, Ren G, Wang S (2015) A highly stable Pd/SiO2/cordierite monolith catalyst for 2-ethyl-anthraquinone hydrogenation. RSC Adv 5:100968–10097710.1039/C5RA17285C ↗
78. Miranda P, Pajares A, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Guiberteau F (2008) Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J Biomed Mater Res Part A An Off J Soc Biomater Japanese Soc Biomater Aust Soc Biomater Korean Soc Biomater 85:218–227
79. Comina G, Suska A, Filippini D (2014) PDMS lab-on-a-chip fabrication using 3D printed templates. Lab Chip 14:424–43010.1039/C3LC50956G ↗
80. Tubío CR, Azuaje J, Escalante L, Coelho A, Guitián F, Sotelo E, Gil A (2016) 3D printing of a heterogeneous copper-based catalyst. J Catal 334:110–11510.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.019 ↗
81. Díaz-Marta AS, Tubío CR, Carbajales C, Fernández C, Escalante L, Sotelo E, Guitián F, Barrio VL, Gil A, Coelho A (2018) Three-dimensional printing in catalysis: combining 3D heterogeneous copper and palladium catalysts for multicatalytic multicomponent reactions. ACS Catal 8:392–40410.1021/acscatal.7b02592 ↗
82. Michorczyk P, Hędrzak E, Węgrzyniak A (2016) Preparation of monolithic catalysts using 3D printed templates for oxidative coupling of methane. J Mater Chem A 4:18753–1875610.1039/C6TA08629B ↗
83. Li Y, Chen S, Cai X, Hong J, Wu X, Xu Y, Zou J, Chen BH (2018) Rational design and preparation of hierarchical monoliths through 3D printing for syngas methanation. J Mater Chem A 6:5695–570210.1039/C8TA01597J ↗
84. Alimi OA, Akinnawo CA, Meijboom R (2020) Monolith catalyst design via 3D printing: a reusable support for modern palladium-catalysed cross-coupling reactions. New J Chem 44:18867–1887810.1039/D0NJ03651J ↗
85. Yang Y, Shi X, Zhao M, Chu S, Xiao J (2020) Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of phenol by a novel binary catalyst of Fe-Ni/MAC. Catalysts 10:112310.3390/catal10101123 ↗
86. Shifu C, Xuqiang L, Yunzhang L, Gengyu C (2007) The preparation of nitrogen-doped TiO2− xNx photocatalyst coated on hollow glass microbeads. Appl Surf Sci 253:3077–308210.1016/j.apsusc.2006.06.058 ↗
87. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R (2017) Polymers for 3D printing and customised additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117:10212–1029010.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
88. Li X, Rezaei F, Rownaghi AA (2018) 3D-printed zeolite monoliths with hierarchical porosity for selective methanol to light olefin reaction. React Chem Eng 3:733–74610.1039/C8RE00095F ↗
89. Abudula T, Qurban RO, Bolarinwa SO, Mirza AA, Pasovic M, Memic A (2020) 3D printing of metal/metal oxide incorporated thermoplastic nanocomposites with antimicrobial properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:56818610.3389/fbioe.2020.568186 ↗
90. Liu W, Huang J, Yang Q, Wang S, Sun X, Zhang W, Liu J, Huo F (2017) Multi-shelled hollow metal-organic frameworks. Angew Chemie Int Ed 56:5512–551610.1002/anie.201701604 ↗
91. Shen K, Zhang L, Chen X, Liu L, Zhang D, Han Y, Chen J, Long J, Luque R, Li Y (2018) Ordered macro-microporous metal-organic framework single crystals. Science 359:206–21010.1126/science.aao3403 ↗
92. Wang C, Kim J, Malgras V, Na J, Lin J, You J, Zhang M, Li J, Yamauchi Y (2019) Metal–organic frameworks and their derived materials: emerging catalysts for a sulfate radicals-based advanced oxidation process in water purification. Small 15:190074410.1002/smll.201900744 ↗
93. Lahtinen E, Precker RLM, Lahtinen M, Hey-Hawkins E, Haukka M (2019) Selective laser sintering of metal-organic frameworks: production of highly porous filters by 3D printing onto a polymeric matrix. ChemPlusChem 84:222–22510.1002/cplu.201900081 ↗
94. Tian T, Velazquez-Garcia J, Bennett TD, Fairen-Jimenez D (2015) Mechanically and chemically robust ZIF-8 monoliths with high volumetric adsorption capacity. J Mater Chem A 3:2999–300510.1039/C4TA05116E ↗
95. Kenel C, Casati NPM, Dunand DC (2019) 3D ink-extrusion additive manufacturing of CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy micro-lattices. Nat Commun 10:1–810.1038/s41467-019-08763-4 ↗
96. Lim GJH, Wu Y, Shah BB, Koh JJ, Liu CK, Zhao D, Cheetham AK, Wang J, Ding J (2019) 3D-Printing of pure metal-organic framework monoliths. ACS Mater Lett 1:147–15310.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00069 ↗
97. Liu D, Jiang P, Li X, Liu J, Zhou L, Wang X, Zhou F (2020) 3D printing of metal-organic frameworks decorated hierarchical porous ceramics for high-efficiency catalytic degradation. Chem Eng J 397:12539210.1016/j.cej.2020.125392 ↗
98. Halevi O, Chen J, Thangavel G, Morris SA, Ben UT, Tischler YR, Lee PS, Magdassi S (2020) Synthesis through 3D printing: formation of 3D coordination polymers. RSC Adv 10:14812–1481710.1039/D0RA01887B ↗
99. Nandi M, Uyama H (2014) Porous acrylate monolith supported Pd nanoparticles: highly active and reusable catalyst for Suzuki-Miyaura reaction in water. RSC Adv 4:20847–2085510.1039/C4RA02057J ↗
100. Quintanilla A, Casas JA, Miranzo P, Osendi MI, Belmonte M (2018) 3D-Printed Fe-doped silicon carbide monolithic catalysts for wet peroxide oxidation processes. Appl Catal B Environ 235:246–25510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.066 ↗