journal article·2020-09

Static and dynamic mechanical performance of short Kevlar fiber reinforced composites fabricated via direct ink writing

Nashat Nawafleh, Fatma Kubra Erbay Elibol, Mutabe Aljaghtham, Emre Oflaz, Andrew J. Ciciriello, Courtney M. Dumont, Edward Dauer, Recep M. Gorguluarslan, Teyfik Demir, Emrah Celik

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Additively manufactured polymer composites have advantages over those fabricated traditionally due to their improved design flexibility, short time frame of design-to-manufacturing process and reduced material waste and investment cost. Additive manufacturing of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites has been well investigated recently, and their mechanical performance has been well characterized. Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic composites, however, has unresolved, high porosity and low mechanical performance issues. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using of a customized, vibration-integrated, direct write additive manufacturing setup to fabricate short Kevlar reinforced epoxy composites. Highly viscous composite inks (max. of 6.3% Kevlar fiber) were successfully extruded and 3D-printed on a print bed, at room temperature. The mechanical performance of the printed composites was examined and compared to that of unreinforced base ink specimens by performing static and dynamic 3-point bending experiments. It was observed that additively manufactured, thermoset-based, short Kevlar fiber reinforced composites possess the mechanical performance surpassing the previously reported short Kevlar fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites and near to that of continuous fiber reinforced composites. Considering their high mechanical performance in addition to low weight, and high ductility, these composite materials have a great potential to find novel structural applications in the near future.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Photopolymerization techniques and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Sikkema DJ, Northolt MG, Pourdeyhimi B (2003) Assessment of new high-performance fibers for advanced applications. MRS Bull 28(8):579–58410.1557/mrs2003.169 ↗
2. Afshari M et al (2008) High performance fibers based on rigid and flexible polymers. Polym Rev 48(2):230–27410.1080/15583720802020129 ↗
3. Adams WW, Eby R (1987) High-performance polymer fibers. MRS Bull 12(8):22–2610.1557/S0883769400066707 ↗
4. Chae HG, Kumar S (2008) Making strong fibers. Science 319(5865):908–90910.1126/science.1153911 ↗
5. Park JH, Rutledge GC (2018) Ultrafine high performance polyethylene fibers. J Mater Sci 53(4):3049–3063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1724-z10.1007/s10853-017-1724-z ↗
6. Parsons EM (2019) Lightweight cellular metal composites with zero and tunable thermal expansion enabled by ultrasonic additive manufacturing: modeling, manufacturing, and testing. Compos Struct 223:11065610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.031 ↗
7. Nguyen N et al (2018) Recent advances on 3D printing technique for thermal-related applications. Adv Eng Mater 20(5):170087610.1002/adem.201700876 ↗
8. Heller BP, Smith DE, Jack DA (2019) Planar deposition flow modeling of fiber filled composites in large area additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 25:227–238
9. Kishore V et al (2017) Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit Manuf 14:7–12
10. van de Werken N et al (2020) Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf 31:100962
11. Celik E (2020) Additive manufacturing. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston10.1515/9781501518782 ↗
12. Goh GD et al (2018) Characterization of mechanical properties and fracture mode of additively manufactured carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Mater Des 137:79–8910.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.021 ↗
13. Balla VK et al (2019) Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos Part B Eng 174:10695610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
14. Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26(34):5930–593510.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
15. Pierson HA et al (2019) Mechanical properties of printed epoxy–carbon fiber composites. Exp Mech 59(6):843–85710.1007/s11340-019-00498-z ↗
16. Tekinalp HL et al (2014) Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 105:144–15010.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
17. Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido RA, Gardner DJ (2019) Enhancing the interlayer tensile strength of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PETG and PLA composites via annealing. Addit Manuf 30:100922
18. Sodeifian G, Ghaseminejad S, Yousefi AA (2019) Preparation of polypropylene/short glass fiber composite as fused deposition modeling (FDM) filament. Results Phys 12:205–22210.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.065 ↗
19. Mangat AS et al (2018) Experimental investigations on natural fiber embedded additive manufacturing-based biodegradable structures for biomedical applications. Rapid Prototyp J 24(7):1221–123410.1108/RPJ-08-2017-0162 ↗
20. Wang K et al (2019) Flexure behaviors of ABS-based composites containing carbon and Kevlar fibers by material extrusion 3D printing. Polymers 11(11):187810.3390/polym11111878 ↗
21. Ning F et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos B Eng 80:369–37810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
22. Karapappas P et al (2009) Enhanced fracture properties of carbon reinforced composites by the addition of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Compos Mater 43(9):977–98510.1177/0021998308097735 ↗
23. Quan Z et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of multi-directional preforms for composites: opportunities and challenges. Mater Today 18(9):503–51210.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.001 ↗
24. Dickson AN et al (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152
25. Ning F et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: effects of process parameters on tensile properties. J Compos Mater 51(4):451–46210.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
26. Oztan C et al (2019) Microstructure and mechanical properties of three dimensional-printed continuous fiber composites. J Compos Mater 53(2):271–28010.1177/0021998318781938 ↗
27. Hmeidat NS, Kemp JW, Compton BG (2018) High-strength epoxy nanocomposites for 3D printing. Compos Sci Technol 160:9–2010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.008 ↗
28. Lewicki J et al (2017) Additive manufacturing continuous filament carbon fiber epoxy composites. Google Patents
29. Zhang Y, Rodrigue D, Aït-Kadi A (2004) Effect of processing on ductility and strength of Kevlar/polyethylene composites. Polym Polym Compos 12(1):17–27
30. Tanner D, Fitzgerald JA, Phillips BR (1989) The Kevlar story—an advanced materials case study. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 28(5):649–65410.1002/anie.198906491 ↗
31. Nawafleh N et al (2019) Additive manufacturing of Kevlar reinforced epoxy composites. Proceedings of the ASME 2019 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. Volume 2A: advanced manufacturing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 11–14 November 201910.1115/IMECE2019-12215 ↗
32. Nawafleh N, Celik E (2020) Additive manufacturing of short fiber reinforced thermoset composites with unprecedented mechanical performance. Addit Manuf 33:101109
33. ASTM, ASTM D7264/D7264M-07 (2007) Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
34. BS, BS ISO 13003:2003 (2003) Fibre reinforced plastics—determination of fatigue properties under cyclic loading conditions. BS, London
35. Little RE (1975) Manual on statistical planning and analysis of fatigue experiments, ASTM STP 588. ASTM, Editor, Philadelphia10.1520/STP588-EB ↗
36. Razavi SMJ et al (2018) Fatigue behavior of porous Ti–6Al–4V made by laser-engineered net shaping. Materials 11(2):28410.3390/ma11020284 ↗
37. Avalle M et al (2002) Static and fatigue strength of a die-cast aluminium alloy under different feeding conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 216(L1):25–30