Hydrogen storage in MIL-88 series
Source abstract
Abstract
To be selected as sorbents for gas storage, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) must be stable to avoid collapsed in humid media. MIL-88 series (abbreviated as MIL-88s) including MIL-88A, B, C, D satisfies high flexibility and stability; it, therefore, may become a suitable candidate for hydrogen storage based on the adsorption. In this work, the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations for the pressures below 100 bar showed that in MIL-88 series MIL-88D exhibits the highest absolute and excess gravimetric H2 capacities of 5.15 wt% and 4.03 wt% at 77 K, and 0.69 wt% and 0.23 wt% at 298 K, respectively. Meanwhile, MIL-88A has the highest absolute and excess volumetric H2 uptakes of 50.69 g/L and 44.32 g/L at 77 K, and 6.97 g/L and 2.49 g/L at 298 K. These results are comparable to the best MOFs for hydrogen storage to date. It was shown that the hydrogen uptakes depend on the special surface area and the pore volume of the MIL-88s, apart from depending on the type of the ligand. By utilizing the van der Waals dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we elucidated the interaction between the H2 molecule and the MIL-88 series. The adsorption energy, as well as the isosteric heat of adsorption, revealed that the H2—MIL-88C interaction is strongest despite its lowest storage capacity. This observation implies an implicit role of electronic structure on the H2 adsorption capacities at the considered conditions. However, at the low temperature, the DFT calculations could elucidate the preferred adsorption sites of hydrogen molecule on the surface of MIL-88s. Besides, we also found that the interaction is dominated by the bonding state of the H2 molecule and the p orbitals of the O and C atoms of the MIL-88s. The most substantial overlap between the electronic density of states (DOS) of the MIL-88C and the DOS of the H2 molecule leads to the most robust interaction between the H2 molecule and the MIL-88C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu C, Li F, Ma LP, Cheng HM (2010) Advanced materials for energy storage. Adv Mater 22:E28–E6210.1002/adma.200903328 ↗
2. Mazloomi K, Gomes C (2012) Hydrogen as an energy carrier: prospects and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3024–303310.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028 ↗
3. Niaz S, Manzoor T, Pandith AH (2015) Hydrogen storage: materials, methods and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:457–46910.1016/j.rser.2015.05.011 ↗
4. Demirocak DE, Zou L, Zhou H-C (2017) Hydrogen production, storage, and utilization. In: Bashir S, Liu JL, Chen Y-P (eds) Nanostructured materials next-generation energy storage conversion. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–14210.1007/978-3-662-53514-1_4 ↗
5. Hwang HT, Varma A (2014) Hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicles. Curr Opin Chem Eng 5:42–4810.1016/j.coche.2014.04.004 ↗
6. Panella B, Hirscher M (2010) Physisorption in porous materials. In: Hirscher M (ed) Handbook of hydrogen storage new materials future energy. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 39–6210.1002/9783527629800.ch2 ↗
7. Han SS, Mendoza-Cortes JL, Goddard WA (2009) Recent advances on simulation and theory of hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1460–147610.1039/b802430h ↗
8. Suh MP, Park HJ, Prasad TK, Lim D-W (2012) Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:782–83510.1021/cr200274s ↗
9. Murray LJ, Dinca M, Long JR (2009) Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1294–131410.1039/b802256a ↗
10. Dincǎ M, Long JR (2008) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal–organic frameworks with exposed metal sites. Angew Chemie Int Ed 47:6766–677910.1002/anie.200801163 ↗
11. Collins DJ, Zhou H, Collins DJ, Collins D (2007) Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. J Mater Chem 17:3154–316010.1039/b702858j ↗
12. Nijem N, Veyan J-F, Kong L et al (2010) Interaction of molecular hydrogen with microporous metal organic framework materials at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc 132:1654–166410.1021/ja908817n ↗
13. Yoon JW, Seo Y, Hwang YK et al (2010) Controlled reducibility of a metal–organic framework with coordinatively unsaturated sites for preferential gas sorption. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:5949–595210.1002/anie.201001230 ↗
14. Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM (2005) Strategies for hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:4670–467910.1002/anie.200462786 ↗
15. Vitillo JG, Regli L, Chavan S et al (2008) Role of exposed metal sites in hydrogen storage in MOFs. J Am Chem Soc 130:8386–839610.1021/ja8007159 ↗
16. Mellot-Draznieks C, Serre C, Surblé S et al (2005) Very large swelling in hybrid frameworks: a combined computational and powder diffraction study. J Am Chem Soc 127:16273–1627810.1021/ja054900x ↗
17. Serre C, Mellot-Draznieks C, Surblé S et al (2007) Role of solvent-host interactions that lead to very large swelling of hybrid frameworks. Science 315:1828–183110.1126/science.1137975 ↗
18. Horcajada P, Salles F, Wuttke S et al (2011) How linker’s modification controls swelling properties of highly flexible iron (III) dicarboxylates MIL-88. J Am Chem Soc 133:17839–1784710.1021/ja206936e ↗
19. Xuan Huynh NT, Na OM, Chihaia V, Son DN (2017) A computational approach towards understanding hydrogen gas adsorption in Co—MIL-88A. RSC Adv 7:39583–3959310.1039/C7RA05801B ↗
20. Wang J, Wan J, Ma Y et al (2016) Metal–organic frameworks MIL-88A with suitable synthesis conditions and optimal dosage for effective catalytic degradation of Orange G through persulfate activation. RSC Adv 6:112502–11251110.1039/C6RA24429G ↗
21. Xu W-T, Ma L, Ke F et al (2014) Metal–organic frameworks MIL-88A hexagonal microrods as a new photocatalyst for efficient decolorization of methylene blue dye. Dalton Trans 43:3792–379810.1039/C3DT52574K ↗
22. McKinlay AC, Eubank JF, Wuttke S et al (2013) Nitric oxide adsorption and delivery in flexible MIL-88(Fe) metal–organic frameworks. Chem Mater 25:1592–159910.1021/cm304037x ↗
23. Wongsakulphasatch S, Kiatkittipong W, Saupsor J et al (2016) Effect of Fe open metal site in metal–organic frameworks on post-combustion CO2 capture performance. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 7:383–39410.1002/ghg.1662 ↗
24. Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis DE, Snurr RQ (2016) RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials. Mol Simul 42:81–10110.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
25. Serre C, Millange F, Surblé S, Férey G (2004) A route to the synthesis of trivalent transition-metal porous carboxylates with trimeric secondary building units. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:6286–628910.1002/anie.200454250 ↗
26. Surble S, Serre C, Mellot-Draznieks C et al (2006) A new isoreticular class of metal–organic-frameworks with the MIL-88 topology. Chem Commun 3:284–28610.1039/B512169H ↗
27. Manz TA, Sholl DS (2012) Improved atoms-in-molecule charge partitioning functional for simultaneously reproducing the electrostatic potential and chemical states in periodic and nonperiodic materials. J Chem Theory Comput 8:2844–286710.1021/ct3002199 ↗
28. Frenkel D, Smit B (eds) (2002) Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 291–320
29. Levesque D, Gicquel A, Darkrim FL, Kayiran SB (2002) Monte Carlo simulations of hydrogen storage in carbon nanotubes. J Phys: Condens Matter 14:9285–9293
30. Dion M, Rydberg H, Schröder E et al (2004) Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Phys Rev Lett 92:24640110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401 ↗
31. Thonhauser T, Cooper VR, Li S et al (2007) Van der Waals density functional: self-consistent potential and the nature of the van der Waals bond. Phys Rev B 76:12511210.1103/PhysRevB.76.125112 ↗
32. Langreth DC, Lundqvist BI, Chakarova-Käck SD et al (2009) A density functional for sparse matter. J Phys: Condens Matter 21:084203
33. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
34. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–5010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
35. Perdew J, Chevary J, Vosko S et al (1992) Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys Rev B 46:6671–668710.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
36. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Errata: generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 78:139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
38. Blochl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
39. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
40. Pack JD, Monkhorst HJ (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–519210.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
41. Methfessel M, Paxton AT (1989) High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys Rev B 40:3616–362110.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
42. Blochl PE, Jepsen O, Andersen OK (1994) Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 49:16223–1623310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
43. Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G (2009) A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys: Condens Matter 21:084204
44. Tyuterev VG, Vast N (2006) Murnaghan’s equation of state for the electronic ground state energy. Comput Mater Sci 38:350–35310.1016/j.commatsci.2005.08.012 ↗
45. Li Y, Xie L, Liu Y et al (2008) Favorable hydrogen storage properties of M(HBTC)(4,4′-bipy).3DMF (M=Ni and Co). Inorg Chem 47:10372–1037710.1021/ic800919k ↗
46. Farha OK, Yazaydın AÖ, Eryazici I et al (2010) De novo synthesis of a metal–organic framework material featuring ultrahigh surface area and gas storage capacities. Nat Chem 2:944–94810.1038/nchem.834 ↗
47. Furukawa H, Ko N, Go YB et al (2010) Ultrahigh porosity in metal–organic frameworks. Science 329:424–42810.1126/science.1192160 ↗
48. Kaye SS, Dailly A, Yaghi OM, Long JR (2007) Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn4O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)3 (MOF-5). J Am Chem Soc 129:14176–1417710.1021/ja076877g ↗
49. Wong-Foy AG, Matzger AJ, Yaghi OM (2006) Exceptional H2 saturation uptake in microporous metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 128:3494–349510.1021/ja058213h ↗
50. Sumida K, Hill MR, Horike S et al (2009) Synthesis and hydrogen storage properties of Be12(OH)12(1,3,5-benzenetribenzoate)4. J Am Chem Soc 131:15120–1512110.1021/ja9072707 ↗
51. Lim WX, Thornton AW, Hill AJ et al (2013) High performance hydrogen storage from Be-BTB metal–organic framework at room temperature. Langmuir 29:8524–853310.1021/la401446s ↗
52. Sumida K, Brown CM, Herm ZR et al (2011) Hydrogen storage properties and neutron scattering studies of Mg2(dobdc)—a metal–organic framework with open Mg2+ adsorption sites. Chem Commun 47:1157–115910.1039/C0CC03453C ↗
53. Li Y, Yang RT (2007) Gas adsorption and storage in metal–organic framework MOF-177. Langmuir 23:12937–1294410.1021/la702466d ↗
54. Yang SJ, Im JH, Nishihara H et al (2012) General relationship between hydrogen adsorption capacities at 77 and 298 K and pore characteristics of the porous adsorbents. J Phys Chem C 116:10529–1054010.1021/jp302304w ↗
55. Huong TTT, Thanh PN, Huynh NTX, Son DN (2016) Metal–organic frameworks: state-of-the-art material for gas capture and storage. VNU J Sci Math Phys 32:67–85
56. Pan L, Sander MB, Huang X et al (2004) Microporous metal organic materials: promising candidates as sorbents for hydrogen storage. J Am Chem Soc 126:1308–130910.1021/ja0392871 ↗
57. Mitchell L, Gonzalez-Santiago B, Mowat JPS et al (2013) Remarkable Lewis acid catalytic performance of the scandium trimesate metal organic framework MIL-100(Sc) for C–C and C=N bond-forming reactions. Catal Sci Technol 3:606–61710.1039/C2CY20577G ↗
58. Sculley J, Yuan D, Zhou H (2011) The current status of hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks-updated. Energy Environ Sci 4:2721–273510.1039/c1ee01240a ↗
59. Oh H, Maurer S, Balderas-Xicohtencatl R et al (2017) Efficient synthesis for large-scale production and characterization for hydrogen storage of ligand exchanged MOF-74/174/184-M (M=Mg2+, Ni2+). Int J Hydrog Energy 42:1027–103510.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.153 ↗
60. Fairen-Jimenez D, Colón YJ, Farha OK et al (2012) Understanding excess uptake maxima for hydrogen adsorption isotherms in frameworks with rht topology. Chem Commun 48:10496–1049810.1039/c2cc35711a ↗
61. Frost H, Snurr RQ (2007) Design requirements for metal–organic frameworks as hydrogen storage materials. J Phys Chem C 111:18794–1880310.1021/jp076657p ↗
62. Schneemann A, Bon V, Schwedler I et al (2014) Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 43:6062–609610.1039/C4CS00101J ↗
63. Heinen J, Burtch NC, Walton KS, Dubbeldam D (2017) Flexible force field parameterization through fitting on the ab initio-derived elastic tensor. J Chem Theory Comput 13:3722–373010.1021/acs.jctc.7b00310 ↗
64. Vanpoucke DEP, Lejaeghere K, Van Speybroeck V, Waroquier M (2015) Mechanical properties from periodic plane wave QM codes: the challenge of the flexible nanoporous MIL-47 (V) framework. J Phys Chem C 119:23752–2376610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06809 ↗
65. Wahiduzzaman M, Lenzen D, Maurin G et al (2018) Rietveld refinement of MIL-160 and its structural flexibility upon H2O and N2. Eur J Inorg Chem 2018:3626–3632. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.20180032310.1002/ejic.201800323 ↗
66. Bakhshian S, Sahimi M (2018) Theoretical model and numerical simulation of adsorption and deformation in flexible metal–organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 122:9465–947310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00924 ↗