journal article·2017-06Open access

Transport and field emission properties of buckypapers obtained from aligned carbon nanotubes

F. Giubileo, L. Iemmo, G. Luongo, N. Martucciello, M. Raimondo, L. Guadagno, M. Passacantando, K. Lafdi, A. Di Bartolomeo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 11

Abstract

We produce 120 um thick buckypapers from aligned carbon nanotubes. Transport characteristics evidence ohmic behavior in a wide temperature range, non linearity appearing in the current-voltage curves only close to 4.2 K. The temperature dependence of the conductance shows that transport is mostly due to thermal fluctuation induced tunneling, although to explain the whole temperature range from 4.2 K to 430 K a further linear contribution is necessary. The field emission properties are measured by means of a nanocontrolled metallic tip acting as collector electrode to access local information about buckypaper properties from areas as small as 1 um2. Emitted current up to 10-5A and turn-on field of about 140V/um are recorded. Long operation, stability and robustness of emitters have been probed by field emission intensity monitoring for more than 12 hours at pressure of 10-6 mbar. Finally, no tuning of the emitted current was observed for in plane applied currents in the buckypaper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58. doi: 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Saito Y, Uemura S (2000) Field emission from carbon nanotubes and its application to electron sources. Carbon 38:169–182. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00139-610.1016/S0008-6223(99)00139-6 ↗
3. Wang QH, Yan M, Chang RPH (2001) Flat panel display prototype using gated carbon nanotube field emitters. Appl Phys Lett 78:1294. doi: 10.1063/1.135184710.1063/1.1351847 ↗
4. Zhang J, Yang G, Cheng Y, Gao B, Qiu Q, Lee YZ, Lu JP, Zhou O (2005) Stationary scanning X-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters. Appl Phys Lett 86:184104. doi: 10.1063/1.192375010.1063/1.1923750 ↗
5. Liu Z, Yang G, Lee YZ, Bordelon D, Lu J, Zhou O (2006) Carbon nanotube based microfocus field emission X-ray source for microcomputed tomography. Appl Phys Lett 89:103111. doi: 10.1063/1.234582910.1063/1.2345829 ↗
6. Teo KBK, Minoux E, Hudanski L, Peauger F, Schnell J-P, Gangloff L, Legagneux P, Dieumegard D, Amaratunga GAJ, Milne WI (2005) Microwave devices: carbon nanotubes as cold cathodes. Nature 437:968. doi: 10.1038/437968a10.1038/437968a ↗
7. Kim D, Bourée J-E, Kim SY (2009) Calculation of the field enhancement for a nanotube array and its emission properties. J Appl Phys 105:84315. doi: 10.1063/1.309128210.1063/1.3091282 ↗
8. Shahi M, Gautam S, Shah PV, Jha P, Kumar P, Rawat JS, Chaudhury PK, Tandon RP (2013) Effect of purity, edge length, and growth area on field emission of multi-walled carbon nanotube emitter arrays. J Appl Phys 113:204304. doi: 10.1063/1.480791610.1063/1.4807916 ↗
9. Giubileo F, Di Bartolomeo A, Scarfato A, Iemmo L, Bobba F, Passacantando M, Santucci S, Cucolo AM (2009) Local probing of the field emission stability of vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 47:1074–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.03510.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.035 ↗
10. Di Bartolomeo A, Scarfato A, Giubileo F, Bobba F, Biasiucci M, Cucolo AM, Santucci S, Passacantando M (2007) A local field emission study of partially aligned carbon-nanotubes by atomic force microscope probe. Carbon 45:2957–2971. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.04910.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.049 ↗
11. Liu H, Shi Y, Chen B, Li X, Ding Y, Lu B (2012) Effect of patterned and aligned carbon nanotubes on field emission properties. Vacuum 86:933–937. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.07.04710.1016/j.vacuum.2011.07.047 ↗
12. Giubileo F, Di Bartolomeo A, Sarno M, Altavilla C, Santandrea S, Ciambelli P, Cucolo AM (2012) Field emission properties of as-grown multiwalled carbon nanotube films. Carbon 50:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.01510.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.015 ↗
13. Chen Y, Miao H-Y, Lin RJ, Zhang M, Liang R, Zhang C, Wang B (2010) Emitter spacing effects on field emission properties of laser-treated single-walled carbon nanotube buckypapers. Nanotechnology 21:495702. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/49/49570210.1088/0957-4484/21/49/495702 ↗
14. Rai P, Mohapatra DR, Hazra KS, Misra DS, Tiwari SP (2008) Nanotip formation on a carbon nanotube pillar array for field emission application. Appl Phys Lett 93:131921. doi: 10.1063/1.299628310.1063/1.2996283 ↗
15. Weng T-W, Lai Y-H, Lee K-Y (2008) Area effect of patterned carbon nanotube bundle on field electron emission characteristics. Appl Surf Sci 254:7755–7758. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.02010.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.020 ↗
16. Seelaboyina R, Boddepalli S, Noh K, Jeon M, Choi W (2008) Enhanced field emission from aligned multistage carbon nanotube emitter arrays. Nanotechnology 19:65605. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/6/06560510.1088/0957-4484/19/6/065605 ↗
17. Fischer JE, Zhou W, Vavro J, Llaguno MC, Guthy C, Haggenmueller R, Casavant MJ, Walters DE, Smalley RE (2003) Magnetically aligned single wall carbon nanotube films: preferred orientation and anisotropic transport properties. J Appl Phys 93:2157–2163. doi: 10.1063/1.153673310.1063/1.1536733 ↗
18. Knapp W, Schleussner D (2003) Field-emission characteristics of carbon buckypaper. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron and Nanometer Struct 21:557–561. doi: 10.1116/1.152759810.1116/1.1527598 ↗
19. Roy S, Bajpai R, Soin N, Bajpai P, Hazra KS, Kulshrestha N, Roy SS, McLaughlin JA, Misra DS (2011) Enhanced field emission and improved supercapacitor obtained from plasma-modified bucky paper. Small 7:688–693. doi: 10.1002/smll.20100233010.1002/smll.201002330 ↗
20. Kaempgen M, Chan CK, Ma J, Cui Y, Gruner G (2009) Printable thin film supercapacitors using single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 9:1872–1876. doi: 10.1021/nl803857910.1021/nl8038579 ↗
21. Bonanni A, Esplandiu MJ, del Valle M (2009) Impedimetric genosensors employing COOH-modified carbon nanotube screen-printed electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2885–2891. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.02.02310.1016/j.bios.2009.02.023 ↗
22. Behabtu N, Green M, Pasquali M (2008) Carbon nanotube-based neat fibers. Nano Today 3:24–34. doi: 10.1016/S1748-0132(08)70062-810.1016/S1748-0132(08)70062-8 ↗
23. Baughman RH (1999) Carbon nanotube actuators. Science 284:1340–1344. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.134010.1126/science.284.5418.1340 ↗
24. Kakade BA, Pillai VK, Late DJ, Chavan PG, Sheini FJ, More MA, Joag DS (2010) High current density, low threshold field emission from functionalized carbon nanotube bucky paper. Appl Phys Lett 97:73102. doi: 10.1063/1.347904910.1063/1.3479049 ↗
25. Passacantando M, Grossi V, Santucci S (2012) High photocurrent from planar strips of vertical and horizontal aligned multi wall carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 100:163119. doi: 10.1063/1.470456910.1063/1.4704569 ↗
26. Heise HM, KucKUK R, Ojha AK, Srivastava A, Srivastava V, Asthana B (2008) Characterization of carbonaceous materials using Raman spectroscopy: a comparison of carbon nanotube filters, single- and multi-walled nanotubes, graphitised porous carbon and graphite. J Raman Spectrosc 40:344–353. doi: 10.1002/jrs.212010.1002/jrs.2120 ↗
27. Song SN, Wang XK, Chang RPH, Ketterson JB (1994) Electronic properties of graphite nanotubules from galvanomagnetic effects. Phys Rev Lett 72:697–700. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.69710.1103/PhysRevLett.72.697 ↗
28. Langer L, Stockman L, Heremans JP, Bayot V, Olk CH, Van Haesendonck C, Bruynseraede Y, Issi J-P (1994) Electrical resistance of a carbon nanotube bundle. J Mater Res 9:927–932. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1994.092710.1557/JMR.1994.0927 ↗
29. deHeer WA, Bacsa WS, Chatelain A, Gerfin T, Humphrey-Baker R, Forro L, Ugarte D (1995) Aligned carbon nanotube films: production and optical and electronic properties. Science 268:845–847. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5212.84510.1126/science.268.5212.845 ↗
30. Di Bartolomeo A, Sarno M, Giubileo F, Altavilla C, Iemmo L, Piano S, Bobba F, Longobardi M, Scarfato A, Sannino D, Cucolo AM, Ciambelli P (2009) Multiwalled carbon nanotube films as small-sized temperature sensors. J Appl Phys 105:64518. doi: 10.1063/1.309368010.1063/1.3093680 ↗
31. Fischer JE, Dai H, Thess A, Lee R, Hanjani NM, Dehaas DL, Smalley RE (1997) Metallic resistivity in crystalline ropes of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 55:R4921–R4924. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R492110.1103/PhysRevB.55.R4921 ↗
32. Langer L, Bayot V, Grivei E, Issi J-P, Heremans JP, Olk CH, Stockman L, Van Haesendonck C, Bruynseraede Y (1996) Quantum transport in a multiwalled carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett 76:479–482. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.47910.1103/PhysRevLett.76.479 ↗
33. Kasumov AY, Khodos II, Ajayan PM, Colliex C (1996) Electrical resistance of a single carbon nanotube. Europhys Lett (EPL) 34:429–434. doi: 10.1209/epl/i1996-00474-010.1209/epl/i1996-00474-0 ↗
34. Mott NF (1967) Electrons in disordered structures. Adv Phys 16:49–144. doi: 10.1080/0001873670010126510.1080/00018736700101265 ↗
35. Sheng P (1980) Fluctuation-induced tunneling conduction in disordered materials. Phys Rev B 21:2180–2195. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.218010.1103/PhysRevB.21.2180 ↗
36. Zhou W (2004) Single wall carbon nanotube fibers extruded from super-acid suspensions: preferred orientation, electrical, and thermal transport. J Appl Phys 95:649–655. doi: 10.1063/1.162745710.1063/1.1627457 ↗
37. Kim GT, Jhang SH, Park JG, Park YW, Roth S (2001) Non-ohmic current–voltage characteristics in single-wall carbon nanotube network. Synth Met 117:123–126. doi: 10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00551-810.1016/S0379-6779(00)00551-8 ↗
38. Simsek Y, Ozyuzer L, Seyhan AT, Tanoglu M, Schulte K (2007) Temperature dependence of electrical conductivity in double-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotube/polyester nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 42:9689–9695. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1943-910.1007/s10853-007-1943-9 ↗
39. Grigorian L, Williams KA, Fang S, Sumanasekera GU, Loper AL, Dickey EC, Pennycook SJ, Eklund PC (1998) Reversible Intercalation of charged iodine chains into carbon nanotube ropes. Phys Rev Lett 80:5560–5563. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.556010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5560 ↗
40. Kaiser B, Park YW, Kim GT, Choi ES, Düsberg G, Roth S (1999) Electronic transport in carbon nanotube ropes and mats. Synth Met 103:2547–2550. doi: 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00222-710.1016/S0379-6779(98)00222-7 ↗
41. Ebbesen TW, Lezec HJ, Hiura H, Bennett JW, Ghaemi HF, Thio T (1996) Electrical conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 382:54–56. doi: 10.1038/382054a010.1038/382054a0 ↗
42. Zhou F, Lu L, Zhang DL, Pan ZW, Xie SS (2004) Linear conductance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes at high temperatures. Solid State Commun 129:407–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2003.09.04010.1016/j.ssc.2003.09.040 ↗
43. Liu K, Avouris P, Martel R, Hsu WK (2001) Electrical transport in doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.16140410.1103/PhysRevB.63.161404 ↗
44. Buitelaar MR, Bachtold A, Nussbaumer T, Iqbal M, Schönenberger C (2002) Multiwall carbon nanotubes as quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.15680110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.156801 ↗
45. Kim J, Kim J-R, Lee J-O, Park JW, So HM, Kim N, Kang K, Yoo K-H, Kim J-J (2003) Fano resonance in crossed carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.16640310.1103/PhysRevLett.90.166403 ↗
46. Gao B, Glattli DC, Plaçais B, Bachtold A (2006) Cotunneling and one-dimensional localization in individual disordered single-wall carbon nanotubes: temperature dependence of the intrinsic resistance. Phys Rev B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.08541010.1103/PhysRevB.74.085410 ↗
47. Zeldov E, Amer NM, Koren G, Gupta A, McElfresh MW, Gambino RJ (1990) Flux creep characteristics in high-temperature superconductors. Appl Phys Lett 56:680–682. doi: 10.1063/1.10331010.1063/1.103310 ↗
48. Salvato M, Cirillo M, Lucci M, Orlanducci S, Ottaviani I, Terranova ML, Toschi F (2008) Charge transport and tunneling in single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Phys Rev Lett. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.24680410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.246804 ↗
49. Ksenevich VK, Odzaev VB, Martunas Z, Seliuta D, Valusis G, Galibert J, Melnikov AA, Wieck AD, Novitski D, Kozlov ME, Samuilov VA (2008) Localization and nonlinear transport in single walled carbon nanotube fibers. J Appl Phys 104:73724. doi: 10.1063/1.299603610.1063/1.2996036 ↗
50. Salvato M, Cirillo M, Lucci M, Orlanducci S, Ottaviani I, Terranova ML, Toschi F (2012) Macroscopic effects of tunnelling barriers in aggregates of carbon nanotube bundles. J Phys D Appl Phys 45:105306. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/10/10530610.1088/0022-3727/45/10/105306 ↗
51. Fowler RH, Nordheim L (1928) Electron emission in intense electric fields. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 119:173–181. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1928.009110.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
52. Passacantando M, Bussolotti F, Santucci S, Di Bartolomeo A, Giubileo F, Iemmo L, Cucolo AM (2008) Field emission from a selected multiwall carbon nanotube. Nanotechnology 19:395701. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/39/39570110.1088/0957-4484/19/39/395701 ↗
53. Santandrea S, Giubileo F, Grossi V, Santucci S, Passacantando M, Schroeder T, Lupina G, Di Bartolomeo A (2011) Field emission from single and few-layer graphene flakes. Appl Phys Lett 98:163109. doi: 10.1063/1.357953310.1063/1.3579533 ↗
54. Di Bartolomeo A, Passacantando M, Niu G, Schlykow V, Lupina G, Giubileo F, Schroeder T (2016) Observation of field emission from GeSn nanoparticles epitaxially grown on silicon nanopillar arrays. Nanotechnology 27:485707. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/48/48570710.1088/0957-4484/27/48/485707 ↗
55. Cao G, Liu W, Cao M, Li X, Zhang A, Wang X, Chen B (2016) Improve the transconductance of a graphene field-effect transistor by folding graphene into a wedge. J Phys D Appl Phys 49:275108. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/27/27510810.1088/0022-3727/49/27/275108 ↗
56. Di Bartolomeo A, Giubileo F, Iemmo L, Romeo F, Russo S, Unal S, Passacantando M, Grossi V, Cucolo AM (2016) Leakage and field emission in side-gate graphene field effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett 109:23510. doi: 10.1063/1.495861810.1063/1.4958618 ↗
57. Di Bartolomeo A, Giubileo F, Romeo F, Sabatino P, Carapella G, Iemmo L, Schroeder T, Lupina G (2015) Graphene field effect transistors with niobium contacts and asymmetric transfer characteristics. Nanotechnology 26:475202. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/47/47520210.1088/0957-4484/26/47/475202 ↗
58. Di Bartolomeo A, Santandrea S, Giubileo F, Romeo F, Petrosino M, Citro R, Barbara P, Lupina G, Schroeder T, Rubino A (2013) Effect of back-gate on contact resistance and on channel conductance in graphene-based field-effect transistors. Diam Relat Mater 38:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2013.06.00210.1016/j.diamond.2013.06.002 ↗
59. Di Bartolomeo A, Giubileo F, Santandrea S, Romeo F, Citro R, Schroeder T, Lupina G (2011) Charge transfer and partial pinning at the contacts as the origin of a double dip in the transfer characteristics of graphene-based field-effect transistors. Nanotechnology 22:275702. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/27570210.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275702 ↗
60. Schwierz F (2010) Graphene transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 5:487–496. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.8910.1038/nnano.2010.89 ↗
61. Wenger C, Kitzmann J, Wolff A, Fraschke M, Walczyk C, Lupina G, Mehr W, Junige M, Albert M, Bartha JW (2015) Graphene based electron field emitter. J Vac Sci Technol B Nanotechnol Microelectron Mater Process Meas Phenom 33:01A109. doi: 10.1116/1.490593710.1116/1.4905937 ↗