journal article·2017-08

Robocast 45S5 bioglass scaffolds: in vitro behavior

Azadeh Motealleh, Siamak Eqtesadi, Ana Civantos, Antonia Pajares, Pedro Miranda

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The in vitro bioactivity and degradation behavior of 45S5 bioglass robocast scaffolds is investigated by immersion tests in simulated body fluid (SBF). A comparative study is conducted between fully amorphous scaffolds, sintered at 550 °C, and mostly crystalline structures, sintered at 1000 °C. The degradation behavior is evaluated through measurements of the weight loss and solution pH variations upon immersion in SBF. The concurrent formation of calcium-rich precipitates on the scaffold surface during immersion in SBF solution was also monitored. The effect of the degradation on the scaffolds’ mechanical performance in compression is subsequently analyzed. Finally, in vitro cell culture experiments were performed to evaluate the proliferation behavior of osteoblast-like cells onto both types of robocast scaffolds. Amorphous scaffolds exhibited an enhanced in vitro degradation and faster calcium carbonate precipitation. However, cell proliferation was not enhanced in the glassy structures compared to the crystalline scaffolds, which demonstrated also a better mechanical performance, as expected.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Hench LL (2006) The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:967–978. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
2. Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 3(7):3867–3910. doi: 10.3390/ma307386710.3390/ma3073867 ↗
3. Rahaman MN, Day DE, Sonny Bal B, Fu Q, Jung SB, Bonewald LF, Tomsia AP (2011) Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 7(6):2355–2373. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
4. Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9(1):4457–4486. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
5. Tesavibul P, Felzmann R, Gruber S, Liska R, Thompson I, Boccaccini AR, Stampfl J (2012) Processing of 45S5 Bioglass® by lithography-based additive manufacturing. Mater Lett 74:81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.01910.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.019 ↗
6. Liu J, Hu H, Li P, Shuai C, Peng S (2013) Fabrication and characterization of porous 45S5 glass scaffolds via direct selective laser sintering. Mater Manuf Process 28(6):610–615. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2012.73665610.1080/10426914.2012.736656 ↗
7. Kolan KC, Leu MC, Hilmas GE, Brown RF, Velez M (2011) Fabrication of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering using indirect selective laser sintering. Biofabrication 3(2):025004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/02500410.1088/1758-5082/3/2/025004 ↗
8. Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR (2006) 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:2414–2425. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
9. Fu Q, Saiz E, Tomsia AP (2011) Direct ink writing of highly porous and strong glass scaffolds for load-bearing bone defects repair and regeneration. Acta Biomater 7(10):3547–3554. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.03010.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.030 ↗
10. Deliormanli AM, Rahaman MN (2012) Direct-write assembly of silicate and borate bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair. J Eur Ceram Soc 32(14):3637–3646. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.05.00510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.05.005 ↗
11. Eqtesadi S, Motealleh A, Pajares A, Miranda P (2015) Effect of milling media on processing and performance of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. Ceram Int 41(1):1379–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.07110.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.071 ↗
12. Eqtesadi S, Motealleh A, Miranda P, Lemos A, Rebelo A, Ferreira JMF (2013) A simple recipe for direct writing complex 45S5 Bioglass® 3D scaffolds. Mater Lett 93:68–71. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.04310.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.043 ↗
13. Eqtesadi S, Motealleh A, Miranda P, Pajares A, Lemos A, Ferreira JMF (2014) Robocasting of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Eur Ceram Soc 34:107–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.00310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.003 ↗
14. Lefebvre L, Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Zenati R, Thollet G, Bernache-Assolant D, Govin A (2007) Structural transformations of bioactive glass 45S5 with thermal treatments. Acta Mater 55(10):3305–3313. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.02910.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.029 ↗
15. Lefebvre L, Gremillard L, Chevalier J, Zenati R, Bernache-Assolant D (2008) Sintering behaviour of 45S5 bioactive glass. Acta Biomater 4(6):1894–1903. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.01910.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.019 ↗
16. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–21710.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
17. Keller TS, Mao Z, Spengler DM (1990) Young’s modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Orthop Res 8(4):592–603. doi: 10.1002/jor.110008041610.1002/jor.1100080416 ↗
18. Lopez-Esteban S, Gutierrez-Gonzalez CF, Gremillard L, Saiz E, Tomsia AP (2009) Interfaces in graded coatings on titanium-based implants. J Biomed Mater Res 88(4):1010–1021. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3193510.1002/jbm.a.31935 ↗
19. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
20. Li P, Yang Q, Zhang F, Kokubo T (1992) The effect of residual glassy phase in a bioactive glass-ceramic on the formation of its surface apatite layer in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 3(6):452–456. doi: 10.1007/BF0070124210.1007/BF00701242 ↗
21. Filho OP, LaTorre GP, Hench LL (1996) Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S5. J Biomed Mater Res 30(4):509–514. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<509::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<509::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
22. Rohanová D, Boccaccini AR, Yunos DM, Horkavcová D, Březovská I, Helebrant A (2011) TRIS buffer in simulated body fluid distorts the assessment of glass-ceramic scaffold bioactivity. Acta Biomater 7(6):2623–2630. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.02810.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.028 ↗
23. Rohanová D, Horkavcová D, Helebrant A, Boccaccini AR (2016) Assessment of in vitro testing approaches for bioactive inorganic materials. J Non-Cryst Solids A 432:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.03.01610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.03.016 ↗
24. Miranda P, Pajares A, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Guiberteau F (2008) Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J Biomed Mater Res A 85:218–227. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3158710.1002/jbm.a.31587 ↗
25. Levy S, Van Dalen M, Agonafer S, Soboyejo WO (2007) Cell/surface interactions and adhesion on bioactive glass 45S5. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18(1):89–102. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0666-910.1007/s10856-006-0666-9 ↗
26. Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Fu H, Liu X (2010) Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. J Biomed Mater Res A 95(1):164–171. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.3282410.1002/jbm.a.32824 ↗
27. Khawam A, Flanagan DR (2006) Solid-state kinetic models: basics and mathematical fundamentals. J Phys Chem B 110(35):17315–17328. doi: 10.1021/jp062746a10.1021/jp062746a ↗
28. Domingos M, Chiellini F, Cometa S, De Giglio E, Grillo-Fernandes E, Bartolo P, Chiellini E (2011) Evaluation of in vitro degradation of PCL scaffolds fabricated via BioExtrusion—Part 2: influence of pore size and geometry. Virtual Phys Prototyp 6(3):157–165. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2011.60583910.1080/17452759.2011.605839 ↗
29. Hench LL, Wilson J (1984) Surface-active biomaterials. Science 226(4675):630–636. doi: 10.1126/science.609325310.1126/science.6093253 ↗
30. Huang W, Day DE, Kittiratanapiboon K, Rahaman MN (2006) Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17(7):583–596. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z10.1007/s10856-006-9220-z ↗
31. Plewinski M, Schickle K, Lindner M, Kirsten A, Weber M, Fischer H (2013) The effect of crystallization of bioactive bioglass 45S5 on apatite formation and degradation. Dent Mater 29(12):1256–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.01610.1016/j.dental.2013.09.016 ↗
32. Boccaccini AR, Chen Q, Lefebvre L, Gremillard L, Chevalier J (2007) Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of Bioglass-derived glass-ceramics. Faraday Discuss 136:27–44. doi: 10.1039/b616539g10.1039/b616539g ↗
33. Martin RA, Twyman H, Qiu D, Knowles JC, Newport RJ (2009) A study of the formation of amorphous calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite on melt quenched Bioglass® using surface sensitive shallow angle X-ray diffraction. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(4):883–888. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3661-510.1007/s10856-008-3661-5 ↗
34. Hoppe A, Meszaros R, Stähli C, Romeis S, Schmidt J, Peukert W, Marelli B, Nazhat SN, Wondraczek L, Lao J, Jallot E, Boccaccini AR (2013) In vitro reactivity of Cu doped 45S5 Bioglass® derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 1(41):5659–5674. doi: 10.1039/c3tb21007c10.1039/c3tb21007c ↗
35. Kashyap S, Griep K, Nychka JA (2011) Crystallization kinetics, mineralization and crack propagation in partially crystallized bioactive glass 45S5. Mater Sci Eng, C 31(4):762–769. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.06.01910.1016/j.msec.2010.06.019 ↗
36. Adams TM, Layton RA (2009) Solid mechanics. Introductory MEMS: Fabrication and applications, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 131–153
37. Xynos ID, Hukkanen MVJ, Batten JJ, Buttery LD, Hench LL, Polak JM (2000) Bioglass® 45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation in vitro: implications and applications for bone tissue engineering. Calcif Tissue Int 67(4):321–329. doi: 10.1007/s00223000113410.1007/s002230001134 ↗
38. Handel M, Hammer TR, Nooeaid P, Boccaccini AR, Hoefer D (2013) 45S5-Bioglass®-based 3D-scaffolds seeded with human adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce in vivo vascularization in the cam angiogenesis assay. Tissue Eng A 19(23–24):2703–2712. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.070710.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0707 ↗