The formation of crystalline phases in metakaolin-based geopolymers in the presence of sodium nitrate
Source abstract
Abstract
Geopolymers generated by alkali-activation of amorphous aluminosilicate sources are considered as an alternative immobilizing matrix for hazardous and nuclear wastes. Low and intermediate level nuclear waste streams are often highly alkaline saline solutions containing various concentrations of nitrate salts. The aim of the research project presented here was to study the effect of nitrate ions on the formation and evolution of metakaolin-based geopolymeric systems at moderate temperatures, i.e., at 40 °C. Metakaolin was alkali-activated using NaOH solutions of varying concentrations, yielding H2O:OH- ratios of 5.50, 9.15, 13.75, and 27.50. Sodium nitrate was added to the activation solutions at a constant [NO3 −]: [OH−] ratio of 0.25. Most geopolymeric mixtures were designed to obtain a Na2O:Al2O3 ratio of 1.00 for nitrate-free mixtures, or 1.25 for those including sodium nitrate. In addition, the effect of deviation from these values (Na2O:Al2O3 ratios of 0.84 and 1.20 for nitrate-free samples, 1.04 and 1.50 for nitrate-bearing samples) was also studied. The samples were cured in sealed containers at 40 °C for periods ranging from 1 day to 3 months. The products were characterized by X-ray diffractometry, Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy as well as by compressive strength measurements. The results demonstrate the influence of composition, alkalinity, SiO2:Al2O3 ratio, Na2O:Al2O3 ratio, nitrate concentration, and curing times on the mineralogy of the geopolymeric matrix. Various crystalline phases such as zeolite A, zeolite X, and nitrate-bearing phases, namely nitrate sodalite and nitrate cancrinite, were identified among the reaction products. The sequence of phase evolution in these geopolymeric systems was elucidated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37:1633–165610.1007/BF01912193 ↗
2. Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D (2007) Geopolymerisation: a review and prospects for the minerals industry. Miner Eng 20:1261–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.07.01110.1016/j.mineng.2007.07.011 ↗
3. Qian G, Sun DD, Tay JH (2003) Immobilization of mercury and zinc in an alkali-activated slag matrix. J Hazard Mater 101:65–77. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00143-210.1016/S0304-3894(03)00143-2 ↗
4. Perera D, Vance E, Kiyama S, et al. (2007) Geopolymers as candidates for the immobilization of low-and intermediate-level waste. In: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, pp 361–366
5. Zhang J, Provis JL, Feng D, van Deventer JSJ (2008) Geopolymers for immobilization of Cr(6+), Cd(2+), and Pb(2+). J Hazard Mater 157:587–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.05310.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.053 ↗
6. Duxson P, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Provis JL et al (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42:2917–2933. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
7. Weng L, Sagoe-Crenstil K (2007) Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: part I—Low Si/Al ratio systems. J Mater Sci 42:2997–3006. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0820-210.1007/s10853-006-0820-2 ↗
8. Rocha J, Klinowski J, Adams JM (1991) Solid-state NMR elucidation of the role of mineralizers in the thermal stability and phase transformations of kaolinite. J Mater Sci 26:3009–3018. doi: 10.1007/BF0112483610.1007/BF01124836 ↗
9. Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2007) Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling. Chem Eng Sci 62:2318–2329. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.02810.1016/j.ces.2007.01.028 ↗
10. Provis JL, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ (2005) Do geopolymers actually contain nanocrystalline zeolites? A reexamination of existing results. Chem Mater 17:3075–308510.1021/cm050230i ↗
11. Zhang B, MacKenzie KJD, Brown IWM (2009) Crystalline phase formation in metakaolinite geopolymers activated with NaOH and sodium silicate. J Mater Sci 44:4668–4676. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3715-110.1007/s10853-009-3715-1 ↗
12. Rahier H, Wastiels J, Biesemans M et al (2006) Reaction mechanism, kinetics and high temperature transformations of geopolymers. J Mater Sci 42:2982–2996. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0568-810.1007/s10853-006-0568-8 ↗
13. Rovnaník P (2010) Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 24:1176–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023 ↗
14. Silva P, Sagoecrenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V (2007) Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cem Concr Res 37:512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.003 ↗
15. Brough AR, Katz A, Sun GK et al (2001) Adiabatically cured, alkali-activated cement-based waste forms containing high levels of fly ash Formation of zeolites and Al-substituted C–S–H. Cem Concr Res 31:1437–1447. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00589-010.1016/S0008-8846(01)00589-0 ↗
16. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Monzo M, Vicent M et al (2008) Alkaline activation of metakaolin-fly ash mixtures: obtain of zeoceramics and zeocements. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 108:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.024 ↗
17. Hajimohammadi A, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2011) Time-resolved and spatially-resolved infrared spectroscopic observation of seeded nucleation controlling geopolymer gel formation. J Colloid Interface Sci 357:384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.02.04510.1016/j.jcis.2011.02.045 ↗
18. Chorover J, Choi S, Amistadi MK et al (2005) Improvement of metakaolin on radioactive Sr and Cs immobilization of alkali-activated slag matrix. J Hazard Mater 92:289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.06.019
19. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Macphee DE, Lachowski EE, Palomo A (2005) Immobilization of cesium in alkaline activated fly ash matrix. J Nucl Mater 346:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.00610.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.006 ↗
20. Provis JL, Walls P, van Deventer JSJ (2008) Geopolymerisation kinetics. 3. Effects of Cs and Sr salts. Chem Eng Sci 63:4480–4489. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.06.00810.1016/j.ces.2008.06.008 ↗
21. Borai EH, Harjula R, Malinen L, Paajanen A (2009) Efficient removal of cesium from low-level radioactive liquid waste using natural and impregnated zeolite minerals. J Hazard Mater 172:416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.03310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.033 ↗
22. El-Kamash AM (2008) Evaluation of zeolite A for the sorptive removal of Cs+ and Sr2+ ions from aqueous solutions using batch and fixed bed column operations. J Hazard Mater 151:432–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.00910.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.009 ↗
23. Ibrahim HA, El-Kamash AM, Hanafy M, Abdel-Monem NM (2008) Examination of the use of synthetic Zeolite NaA-X blend as backfill material in a radioactive waste disposal facility: thermodynamic approach. Chem Eng J 144:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.01210.1016/j.cej.2008.01.012 ↗
24. Mon J, Deng Y, Flury M, Harsh JB (2005) Cesium incorporation and diffusion in cancrinite, sodalite, zeolite, and allophane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 86:277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.07.03010.1016/j.micromeso.2005.07.030 ↗
25. Demortier A, Gobeltz N, Lelieur JP, Duhayon C (1999) Infrared evidence for the formation of an intermediate compound during the synthesis of zeolite Na–A from metakaolin. Int J Inorg Mater 1:129–134. doi: 10.1016/S1466-6049(99)00020-310.1016/S1466-6049(99)00020-3 ↗
26. Zhang Z, Wang H, Provis JL et al (2012) Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 1. The activation of metakaolin with sodium hydroxide. Thermochim Acta 539:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.03.02110.1016/j.tca.2012.03.021 ↗
27. Breck DW (1974) Zeolite molecular sieves: structure, chemistry and use. Wiley, New York
28. Desbats-Le Chequer C, Frizon F (2011) Impact of sulfate and nitrate incorporation on potassium- and sodium-based geopolymers: geopolymerization and materials properties. J Mater Sci 46:5657–5664. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5516-610.1007/s10853-011-5516-6 ↗
29. Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D, Bartzas G (2013) Effect of sulphate and nitrate anions on heavy metal immobilisation in ferronickel slag geopolymers. Appl Clay Sci 73:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.01810.1016/j.clay.2012.09.018 ↗
30. Lee WK, van Deventer JSJ (2002) The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 211:115–126. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00239-X10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00239-X ↗
31. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A (2005) Mid-infrared spectroscopic studies of alkali-activated fly ash structure. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 86:207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.05710.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.057 ↗
32. Molina A, Poole C (2004) A comparative study using two methods to produce zeolites from fly ash. Amin Eng 17:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2003.10.025
33. Purnomo CW, Salim C, Hinode H (2012) Synthesis of pure Na-X and Na-A zeolite from bagasse fly ash. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 162:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.00710.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.007 ↗
34. Fernandes Machado NRC, Miotto DMM (2005) Synthesis of Na-A and -X zeolites from oil shale ash. Fuel 84:2289–2294. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.00310.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.003 ↗
35. Katz A (1998) Microscopic study of alkali-activated fly ash. Cem Concr Res 28:197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00271-810.1016/S0008-8846(97)00271-8 ↗
36. Barnes MC, Addai-Mensah J, Gerson AR (1999) A methodology for quantifying sodalite and cancrinite phase mixtures and the kinetics of the sodalite to cancrinite phase transformation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 31:303–31910.1016/S1387-1811(99)00080-3 ↗
37. Buhl JC, Lons J (1996) Synthesis and crystal structure of nitrate enclathrated sodalite Na-8[AlSiO4](6)(NO3)(2). J Alloys Compd 235:41–47. doi: 10.1016/0925-8388(95)02148-510.1016/0925-8388(95)02148-5 ↗
38. Buhl JC, Taake C, Stief F, Fechtelkord M (2000) The crystallisation kinetics of nitrate cancrinite Na-7.6[AlSiO4](6)(NO3)(1.6) (H2O2)(2) under low temperature hydrothermal conditions. React Kinet Catal Lett 69:15–21. doi: 10.1023/A:100567632220610.1023/A:1005676322206 ↗
39. Buhl JC, Stief F, Fechtelkord M et al (2000) Synthesis, X-ray diffraction and MAS NMR characteristics of nitrate cancrinite Na-7.6[AlSiO4](6)(NO3)(1.6)(H2O)(2). J Alloys Compd 305:93–102. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)00724-610.1016/S0925-8388(00)00724-6 ↗
40. Kumar R, Bhaumik A, Ahedi RK, Genapathy S (1996) Promoter-induced enhancement of the crystallization rate of zeolites and related molecular sieves. Nature 381:29810.1038/381298a0 ↗
41. Liu Q, Navrotsky A (2007) Synthesis of nitrate sodalite: an in situ scanning calorimetric study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2072–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.01.01110.1016/j.gca.2007.01.011 ↗
42. Barnes MC, Addai-Mensah J, Gerson AR (1999) The mechanism of the sodalite-to-cancrinite phase transformation in synthetic spent Bayer liquor. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 31:287–30210.1016/S1387-1811(99)00079-7 ↗
43. Deng Y, Flury M, Harsh J et al (2006) Cancrinite and sodalite formation in the presence of cesium, potassium, magnesium, calcium and strontium in Hanford tank waste simulants. Appl Geochemistry 21:2049–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.06.01910.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.06.019 ↗
44. Liu Q, Xu H, Navrotsky A (2005) Nitrate cancrinite: synthesis, characterization, and determination of the enthalpy of formation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 87:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.08.00810.1016/j.micromeso.2005.08.008 ↗
45. Chen S, Wu M, Zhang S (2010) Mineral phases and properties of alkali-activated metakaolin-slag hydroceramics for a disposal of simulated highly-alkaline wastes. J Nucl Mater 402:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.01510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.015 ↗
46. Barrer RM (1978) Zeolites and Clay Minerals as Sorbents and Molecular Sieves. Acadamic Press, London
47. Hollman G, Steenbruggen G, Janssen-Jurkovičová M (1999) A two-step process for the synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash. Fuel 78:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00030-710.1016/S0016-2361(99)00030-7 ↗
48. Gabelica Z, Blom N, Derouane EG (1983) Synthesis and characterization of zsm-5 type zeolites: III. A critical evaluation of the role of alkali and ammonium cations. Appl Catal 5:227–248. doi: 10.1016/0166-9834(83)80135-310.1016/0166-9834(83)80135-3 ↗
49. Ocanto F, Alvarez R, Urbinadenavarro C et al (2008) Influence of the alkalinity and NO3-/Cl− anionic composition on the synthesis of the cancrinite–sodalite system. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 116:318–322. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.01910.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.019 ↗
50. Zhao H, Deng Y, Harsh JB et al (2004) Alternation of kaolinite to cancrinite and sodalite by simulated Hanford tank waste and its impact on cesium retention. Clays Clay Miner 52:1–1310.1346/CCMN.2004.0520101 ↗
51. Chorover J, Choi S, Amistadi MK et al (2003) Linking cesium and strontium uptake to kaolinite weathering in simulated tank waste leachate. Environ Sci Technol 37:2200–220810.1021/es025980x ↗
52. Chorover J, Choi S, Rotenberg P et al (2008) Silicon control of strontium and cesium partitioning in hydroxide-weathered sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:2024–2047. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.02610.1016/j.gca.2008.01.026 ↗
53. Choi S, Crosson G, Mueller K et al (2005) Clay mineral weathering and contaminant dynamics in a caustic aqueous system II. Mineral transformation and microscale partitioning. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:4437–4451. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.04.00410.1016/j.gca.2005.04.004 ↗