journal article·2008-06

Aging behavior of Cu–Ti–Al alloy observed by transmission electron microscopy

Toyohiko J. Konno, Rimi Nishio, Satoshi Semboshi, Tetsu Ohsuna, Eiji Okunishi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Aging behavior of Cu–3 at.%Ti–4 at.%Al alloy at 723 K has been examined from mechanical, electrical, and microstructural points of view. Compared with binary Cu–3 at.%Ti alloy, the electrical conductivity improved six times to about 6%IACS (international annealed copper standard); whereas the peak hardness decreased from 280 to 180 Hv. The major strengthening phase is the tetragonal α-Cu4Ti, which forms not via spinodal decomposition but based on the nucleation and growth mechanism. The precipitates grow in the c direction of the tetragonal phase, which lies along one of the $$ {\left\langle {100} \right\rangle } $$ axes of the matrix fcc Cu phase. This growth mode minimizes the strain energy arising from the lattice mismatch of about 2% between the matrix and precipitate; and results in a square rod shape, which reaches about 50 nm in length after 100 h anneal. Another precipitating phase is AlCu2Ti (D03, Strukturbericht notation), with the major habit plane close to {110} of the fcc Cu matrix. The orientation relationship was not definitely determined, but it was found that the angle between the 100 and 110 poles of the matrix and precipitates, respectively, is about 5°, while the angle between the two 001 axes being about 7°. It was suggested that the formation of this ternary phase reduced the solute Ti concentration, leading to the decrease in the resistivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Rioya RJ, Laughlin DE (1980) Acta Metall 28:130110.1016/0001-6160(80)90086-3 ↗
2. Yamamoto A, Tsubakino H (1994) Script Metall Mater 31:78710.1016/0956-716X(94)90228-3 ↗
3. Nagarjuna S, Sarma DS (2002) J Mater Sci 37:192910.1023/A:1015278610543 ↗
4. Suzuki S, Hirabayashi K, Shibata H, Mimura K, Isshiki M, Waseda Y (2003) Scripta Mater 48:43110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00441-4 ↗
5. Soffa WA, Laughlin DE (2004) Prog Mater Sci 49:34710.1016/S0079-6425(03)00029-X ↗
6. Hernandez-Santiago F, Cayetano-Castro N, Lopez-Hirata VM, Dorantes-Rosales HJ, Cruz-Rivera JJ (2004) Mater Trans 45:231210.2320/matertrans.45.2312 ↗
7. Nishio R, Konno TJ, Semboshi S (2005) Mater Sci Forum 502:16310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.502.163 ↗
8. Massalski TB (ed) (1990) Binary alloy phase diagrams, 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, p 1494
9. Pfeifer HU, Bahn S, Schubert K (1968) J Less-Common Met 14:29110.1016/0022-5088(68)90034-9 ↗
10. Brun J-Y, Hamar-Thibault S-J, Allibert C-H (1983) Z Metallkde 74:525
11. Knights R, Wilkes P (1973) Acta Metall 21:150310.1016/0001-6160(73)90180-6 ↗
12. Borchers C (1999) Phil Mag A 79:53710.1080/01418619908210315 ↗
13. Nishio R (2006) MSc thesis, Osaka Prefecture University
14. Ran Q, Stadelmaier HH (1992) In: Petzow G, Effenberg G (eds) Ternary alloys. VCH, Materials Park, p 51
15. Raman A, Schubert K (1965) Z Metalknd 56:99
16. Reimer L (1993) Transmission electron microscopy. Springer–Verlag, Berlin10.1007/978-3-662-21556-2 ↗
17. Laughlin DE, Cahn JW (1975) Acta Metall 23:32910.1016/0001-6160(75)90125-X ↗
18. Datta A, Soffa WA (1976) Acta Metall 24:98710.1016/0001-6160(76)90129-2 ↗
19. Guinier A (1938) Nature 142:56910.1038/142569b0 ↗
20. Preston GD (1938) Nature 142:57010.1038/142570a0 ↗
21. Konno TJ, Kawasaki M, Hiraga K (2001) Phil Mag B 81:171310.1080/13642810110079953 ↗