Synthesis, magnetization, and photocatalytic activity of LaFeO3 and LaFe0.9Mn0.1O3−δ
Source abstract
Abstract
LaFe0.9Mn0.1O3−δ and LaFeO3 were synthesized and characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared, XPS techniques, UV–Visible absorption spectra techniques, vibrating sample magnetometer, and room temperature Fe57 Mossbauer spectra. They were also evaluated for their photocatalytic activity toward the degradation of methyl orange under the sunlight irradiation. The experimental results show that the catalytic activities of the Mn-doped in LaFeO3, i.e., LaFe0.9Mn0.1O3−δ were much higher than those of LaFeO3 due to its higher oxygen vacancies, variable valency Mn ions and the strong absorption in visible light, and it has higher magnetic property than that of LaFeO3 due to the existence of Mn3+/Fe3+and Mn3+/Mn4+double exchange interaction in LaFe0.9Mn0.1O3−δ. The LaFe0.9Mn0.1O3−δ is the photocatalyst with intrinsic magnetic property and visible light activity, and it is applicable to the magnetic separation process for its higher saturated magnetization (Ms), lower coercivity (Hc), and remanent magnetization (Mr) as well as the superparamagnetic contribution in the sample, and it can be reusable and maintain relatively high activity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang L, Wang WZ, Zhou L, Shang M, Sun SM (2009) Appl Catal B Environ 90:458. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.00510.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.005 ↗
2. Jiang JH, Gao QM, Chen Zh, Hu J, Wu CD (2006) Mater Lett 60:3803. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.11710.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.117 ↗
3. Qiu W, Zheng Y, Haralampides Katy A (2007) J Chem Eng 125:165. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2006.08.02510.1016/j.cej.2006.08.025 ↗
4. Lee SW, Drwiega J, Wu CY, Mazyck D, Sigmund Wolfgang M (2004) Chem Mater 16:1160. doi: 10.1021/cm035190210.1021/cm0351902 ↗
5. Beydoun D, Amal R (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:4387. doi: 10.1021/jp992088c10.1021/jp992088c ↗
6. Li XY, Wang JN, Zhang LL, Li CJ (2012) J Mater Sci 47:465. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5821-010.1007/s10853-011-5821-0 ↗
7. Liu SQ (2011) Environ Chem Lett. doi: 10.1007/s10311-011-0348-910.1007/s10311-011-0348-9 ↗
8. Chen HX, Wei ZX, Wang Y, Zen WW, Xiao CM (2011) Mater Chem Phys 130:1387. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.09.03810.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.09.038 ↗
9. Hwang HY (2005) Nature Mater 4:803. doi: 10.1038/nmat151510.1038/nmat1515 ↗
10. Li P, Ouyang SX, Xi GC, Kako T, Ye JH (2012) J Phys Chem C 116:7621. doi: 10.1021/jp210106b10.1021/jp210106b ↗
11. Wang L, Wang WZ (2012) Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:3041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.10510.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.105 ↗
12. Isupova LA, Sutormina EF, Kulikovskaya NA, Plyasova LM, Rudina NA, Ovsyannikova IA, Zolotarskii IA, Sadykov VA (2005) Catal Today 105:429. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.03910.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.039 ↗
13. Liu ZM, Hao JM, Fu LX, Zhu TL (2003) Appl Catal B 44:355. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00103-610.1016/S0926-3373(03)00103-6 ↗
14. Hur SG, Kim TW, Hwang SJ, Park H, Choi W, Kim SJ, Choy JH (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:15001. doi: 10.1002/chin.20054601510.1021/jp051752o ↗
15. Hammami R, Batis H, Minot C (2009) Surf Sci 603:3057. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2009.08.01610.1016/j.susc.2009.08.016 ↗
16. Han LA, Chen CL, Dong HY, Wang JY, Gao GM (2008) Phys B 403:2614. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.0110.1016/j.physb.2008.01.023 ↗
17. Cano LA, Cagnoli MV, Stewart SJ, Cabanillas ED, Romero EL, Marchetti SG (2010) Hyperfine Interact 195:275. doi: 10.1007/s10751-009-0129-z10.1007/s10751-009-0129-z ↗
18. Zhang N, Ding W, Zhong W, Du K, Wang K, Du Y (1997) Appl Phys A 65:77. doi: 10.1007/s00339005054610.1007/s003390050546 ↗
19. Liu KL, Yuan SL, Tian ZM, He JH, Li P, Yin SY, Zheng XF, Wang CH, Duan HN, Huo SX (2010) J Magn Magn Mater 322:73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.08.03110.1016/j.jmmm.2009.08.031 ↗
20. de Lima OF, Coaquira JAH, de Almeida RL, de Carvalho LB, Malik SK (2009) J Appl Phys 105:013907. doi: 10.1063/1.305432310.1063/1.3054323 ↗
21. Wei ZX, Xu YQ, Liu HY, Hu CW (2009) J Hazard Mater 165:1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.08610.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.086 ↗
22. Milt VG, Spretz R, Ulla MA, Lombardo EA, GarcíaFierro JL (1996) Catal Lett 42:57. doi: 10.1007/BF0081446710.1007/BF00814467 ↗
23. Yan XL, Ohno T, Nishijima K, Abe R, Ohtani B (2006) Chem Phys Lett 429:606. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.08.08110.1016/j.cplett.2006.08.081 ↗
24. Shen H, Xu JY, Wu AH (2010) J Rare Earths 28:416. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.09.03010.1016/S1002-0721(09)60124-1 ↗
25. Wongsaprom K, Swatsitang E, Maensiri S (2007) Appl Phys Lett 90:162506.1. doi: 10.1063/1.272477210.1063/1.2724772 ↗
26. Giraudon JM, Elhachimi A, Wyrwalski F, Siffert S, Aboukaïs A, Lamonier JF, Leclercq G (2007) Appl Catal B 75:157. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.00510.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.005 ↗
27. Barbara K, Włodzimierz T (2008) Appl Catal A 335:28. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.11.00410.1016/j.apcata.2007.11.004 ↗
28. Morilla-Santos Ca, Schreiner WH, Lisboa-Filho PN (2011) Mater Res 14:217. doi: 10.1590/S1516-1439201100500003610.1590/S1516-14392011005000036 ↗
29. Valencia S, Gaupp A, Gudat W (2007) Phys Rev B 75:184431. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.18443110.1103/PhysRevB.75.184431 ↗
30. Ueda K, Muraoka Y, Tabata H, Kawai T (2001) Appl Phys Lett 78:512. doi: 10.1063/1.134384410.1063/1.1343844 ↗
31. Chen XQ, Lam KF, Zhang QJ, Pan BC, Arruebo M, Yeung KL (2009) J Phys Chem C 113:9804. doi: 10.1021/jp901805210.1021/jp9018052 ↗
32. Ao YH, Xu JJ, Fu DG, Yuan CW (2009) J Alloys Comp 471:33. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.00110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.001 ↗