Compressive stress-electrical conductivity characteristics of multiwall carbon nanotube networks
Source abstract
Abstract
A network of entangled multiwall carbon nanotubes is presented as a conductor whose conductivity is sensitive to compressive stress both in the course of monotonic stress growth and when loading/unloading cycles are imposed. The testing has shown as much as 100% network conductivity increase at the maximum applied stress. It indicates favorable properties of multiwall carbon nanotube networks for their use as stress-electric signal transducers. To model the conductivity-stress dependence, it is hypothesized that compression increases local contact forces between nanotubes, which results in more conductive contacts. The lack of detailed knowledge of the mechanism as well as an unclear shift from individual contacts to the whole network conductance behavior is circumvented with a statistical approach. In this respect, good data representation is reached using Weibull distribution for the description of distribution of nanotube contact resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Thostenson ET, Li CY, Chou TW (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:49110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
2. Cao Q, Rogers JA (2009) Adv Mater 21:2910.1002/adma.200801995 ↗
3. Walters DA, Casavant MJ, Quin XC, Huffman CB, Boul PJ, Ericson LM, Haroz EH, O’Connel MJ, Smith K, Colbert DT, Smalley RE (2001) Chem Phys Lett 338:1410.1016/S0009-2614(01)00072-0 ↗
4. Poquillon D, Viguier B, Andrieu E (2005) J Mat Sci 40:5963. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-5070-110.1007/s10853-005-5070-1 ↗
5. Allaoui A, Hoa SV, Evesque P, Bai J (2009) Scripta Mater 6:62810.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.045 ↗
6. Kukowecz A, Smajda R, Oze M, Schaefer B, Haspel H, Konya Z, Kiricsi I (2008) Phys Stat Sol 245:233110.1002/pssb.200879556 ↗
7. Simsek Y, Ozyuzer L, Seyham AT, Tanoglu M, Schulte K (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9689. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1943-910.1007/s10853-007-1943-9 ↗
8. Chang L, Friedrich K, Ye L, Toro P (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4003. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3551-310.1007/s10853-009-3551-3 ↗
9. Ham HT, Choi YS, Chung IJ (2005) Colloid Interf Sci 286:21610.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.002 ↗
10. Kimmer D, Slobodian P, Petras D, Zatloukal M, Olejník R, Saha P (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 111:271110.1002/app.29238 ↗
11. Wang D, Song PC, Liu CH, Wu W, Fan SS (2008) Nanotechnology 19(7):1
12. Ashrafi B, Guan JW, Mirjalili V, Hubert P, Simard B, Johnston A (2010) COMPOS PART A-APPL S 41(9):118410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.04.018 ↗
13. Xie XL, Mai YW, Zhou XP (2005) Mater Sci Eng 49:8910.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
14. Yaglioglu O, Hart AJ, Martens R, Slocum AH (2006) Rev Sci Instrum 77:095105/110.1063/1.2349300 ↗