journal article·2016-01Open access

Fast-curing epoxy polymers with silica nanoparticles: properties and rheo-kinetic modelling

A. Keller, K. Masania, A. C. Taylor, C. Dransfeld

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 1

Abstract

Fast-curing epoxy polymers allow thermoset parts to be manufactured in minutes, but the curing reaction is highly exothermic with heat flows up to 20 times higher than conventional epoxies. The low thermal conductivity of the polymer causes the mechanical and kinetic properties of parts to vary through their thickness. In the present work, silica nanoparticles were used to reduce the exotherm, and hence improve the consistency of the parts. The mechanical and kinetic properties were measured as a function of part thickness. The exothermic heat of reaction was significantly reduced with the addition of silica nanoparticles, which were well dispersed in the epoxy. The silica nanoparticles increased the Young’s modulus linearly from 3.6 to 4.6 GPa with 20 wt% of silica, but the fracture energy was found to increase less than for many slow-curing epoxy resins, with values of 176–211 J m−2 being measured. Although there was no additional toughening, shear band yielding was observed. Further, the addition of silica nanoparticles increased the molecular weight between crosslinks, indicating the relevance of detailed cure kinetics when studying fast-curing epoxy resins. A model was developed to describe the increase in viscosity and degree of cure of the unmodified and the silica-modified epoxies. A heat transfer equation was used to predict the temperature and resulting properties through the thickness of a plate, as well as the effect of the addition of silica nanoparticles. The predictions were compared to the experimental data, and the agreement was found to be very good.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Bhat P, Merotte J, Simacek P, Advani SG (2009) Process analysis of compression resin transfer molding. Compos A 40(4):431–44110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.006 ↗
2. Karkanas PI, Partridge IK (2000) Cure modeling and monitoring of epoxy/amine resin systems. I. Cure kinetics modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 77(7):1419–143110.1002/1097-4628(20000815)77:7<1419::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
3. Yousefi A, Lafleur PG, Gauvin R (1997) Kinetic studies of thermoset cure reactions: a review. Polym Compos 18(2):157–16810.1002/pc.10270 ↗
4. Kiuna N, Lawrence CJ, Fontana QPV, Lee PD, Selerland T, Spelt PDM (2002) A model for resin viscosity during cure in the resin transfer moulding process. Compos A 33(11):1497–150310.1016/S1359-835X(02)00177-X ↗
5. Hardis R, Jessop JLP, Peters FE, Kessler MR (2013) Cure kinetics characterization and monitoring of an epoxy resin using DSC, Raman spectroscopy, and DEA. Compos A 49:100–10810.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.021 ↗
6. Yang LF, Yao KD, Koh W (1999) Kinetics analysis of the curing reaction of fast cure epoxy prepregs. J Appl Polym Sci 73(8):1501–150810.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990822)73:8<1501::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
7. Prime RB, Michalski C, Neag CM (2005) Kinetic analysis of a fast reacting thermoset system. Thermochim Acta 429(2):213–21710.1016/j.tca.2004.11.029 ↗
8. Guo Z-S, Du S, Zhang B (2005) Temperature field of thick thermoset composite laminates during cure process. Compos Sci Technol 65(3):517–52310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.015 ↗
9. Zhang J, Xu Y, Huang P (2009) Effect of cure cycle on curing process and hardness for epoxy resin. Express Polym Lett 3(9):534–54110.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.67 ↗
10. Nelson J, Hine AM, Goetz DP, Sedgwick P, Lowe RH, Rexeisen E, King RE, Aitken C, Pham Q (2013) Properties and applications of nanosilica-modified tooling prepregs. SAMPE Journal 49:7–17
11. Sprenger S, Kothmann MH, Altstaedt V (2014) Carbon fiber-reinforced composites using an epoxy resin matrix modified with reactive liquid rubber and silica nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol 105:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.003 ↗
12. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The mechanisms and mechanics of the toughening of epoxy polymers modified with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 51(26):6284–6294. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.04810.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048 ↗
13. Giannakopoulos I, Masania K, Taylor AC (2011) Toughening of epoxy using core-shell particles. J Mater Sci 46(2):327–338. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4816-610.1007/s10853-010-4816-6 ↗
14. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45(5):1193–1210. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
15. Bray DJ, Dittanet P, Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Pearson RA, Taylor AC (2013) The modelling of the toughening of epoxy polymers via silica nanoparticles: the effects of volume fraction and particle size. Polymer 54(26):7022–7032. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.03410.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.034 ↗
16. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Agarwal R, Schueneman G, Sprenger S (2007) The fracture and fatigue behaviour of nano-modified epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 42(16):7049–7051. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1768-610.1007/s10853-007-1768-6 ↗
17. Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Egan D (2008) The fracture of glass-fibre reinforced epoxy composites using nanoparticle-modified matrices. J Mater Sci 43(3):1151–1154. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2390-310.1007/s10853-007-2390-3 ↗
18. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Egan D (2006) The interlaminar toughness of carbon-fibre reinforced plastic composites using ‘hybrid-toughened’ matrices. J Mater Sci 41(15):5043–5046. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0130-810.1007/s10853-006-0130-8 ↗
19. Nielsen LE (1969) Cross-linking effect on physical properties of polymers. J Macromol Sci 3:69–103. doi: 10.1080/1558372690854589710.1080/15583726908545897 ↗
20. Bellenger V, Verdu J, Morel E (1987) Effect of structure on glass transition temperature of amine crosslinked epoxies. J Polym Sci 25(6):1219–123410.1002/polb.1987.090250604 ↗
21. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1989) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. 3. The effect of cross-link density. J Mater Sci 24(7):2571–2580. doi: 10.1007/BF0117452810.1007/BF01174528 ↗
22. BS-EN-ISO-527-2, Plastics: determination of tensile properties. Part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics, 2012, BSI, London
23. Williams J, Ford H (1964) Stress-strain relationships for some unreinforced plastics. J Mech Eng Sci 6(4):405–417. doi: 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1964_006_055_0210.1243/JMES_JOUR_1964_006_055_02 ↗
24. ASTM-D5045-99, Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials, 2007, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
25. Vyazovkin S, Wight CA (1999) Model-free and model-fitting approaches to kinetic analysis of isothermal and nonisothermal data. Thermochim Acta 340:53–6810.1016/S0040-6031(99)00253-1 ↗
26. Vyazovkin S (2006) Model-free kinetics. J Therm Anal Calorim 83(1):45–5110.1007/s10973-005-7044-6 ↗
27. Kandelbauer A (2009) Wuzella, G, Mahendran, A, Taudes, I, Widsten, P, Model-free kinetic analysis of melamine–formaldehyde resin cure. Chem Eng J 152(2):556–56510.1016/j.cej.2009.05.027 ↗
28. Rivero G, Pettarin V, Vázquez A, Manfredi LB (2011) Curing kinetics of a furan resin and its nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 516(1):79–8710.1016/j.tca.2011.01.022 ↗
29. Bailleul J-L, Delaunay D, Jarny Y (1996) Determination of temperature variable properties of composite materials: methodology and experimental results. J Reinf Plast Compos 15(5):479–49610.1177/073168449601500503 ↗
30. Ruiz E, Trochu F (2005) Thermomechanical properties during cure of glass-polyester RTM composites: elastic and viscoelastic modeling. J Compos Mater 39(10):881–91610.1177/0021998305048732 ↗
31. DiBenedetto AT (1987) Prediction of the glass transition temperature of polymers: a model based on the principle of corresponding states. J Polym Sci 25(9):1949–196910.1002/polb.1987.090250914 ↗
32. Lewis RW, Nithiarasu P, Seetharamu K (2004) Fundamentals of finite element method for heat and fluid flow. Wiley, Chichester10.1002/0470014164 ↗
33. Wong CP, Bollampally RS (1999) Thermal conductivity, elastic modulus, and coefficient of thermal expansion of polymer composites filled with ceramic particles for electronic packaging. J Appl Polym Sci 74(14):3396–340310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991227)74:14<3396::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
34. Bray DJ, Gilmour SG, Guild FJ, Hsieh TH, Masania K, Taylor AC (2011) Quantifying nanoparticle dispersion: application of the Delaunay network for objective analysis of sample micrographs. J Mater Sci 46(19):6437–6452. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5615-410.1007/s10853-011-5615-4 ↗
35. Vörös G, Pukánszky B (1995) Stress distribution in particulate filled composites and its effect on micromechanical deformation. J Mater Sci 30(16):4171–4178. doi: 10.1007/BF0036072610.1007/BF00360726 ↗
36. Pukánszky B, Vörös G (1996) Stress distribution around inclusions, interaction, and mechanical properties of particulate-filled composites. Polym Compos 17(3):384–392. doi: 10.1002/pc.1062510.1002/pc.10625 ↗
37. Ashby MF, Jones DR, Heinzelmann M (2006) Werkstoffe: Eigenschaften, Mechanismen und Anwendungen. Elsevier, Spektrum Akad, Verlag