Fabrication of highly interconnected porous poly(ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds with supercritical CO2 foaming and polymer leaching
Source abstract
Abstract
Highly interconnected porous poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds combined with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) foaming and a polymer leaching process were fabricated by blending PCL with water-soluble poly(ethyleneoxide) (PEO) as a sacrificial material. The effects of foaming conditions and the phase morphology of blend on foaming behavior and pore morphology were investigated. Rheological results and phase morphology indicated that the PCL and PEO were immiscible. For both spherical droplets and co-continuous phase morphologies of PCL/PEO blend, batch foaming experimental results indicated that increasing CO2 saturation time and foaming pressure led to significant decreases in pore size, but increasing temperature led to opposite results. The incorporation of PEO not only facilitated the foaming of PCL by increasing its viscosity, but it also improved the porosity and interconnectivity of the post-leached PCL scaffolds. The porosity improved by up to 93.5%, and the open pore content increased by up to 90.9% for the PCL50 blend (50% PCL by weight). The leaching process had more contribution on the open pore content for PCL/PEO porous scaffolds with co-continuous phase morphologies than for the spherical droplet structures due to different cell-opening mechanisms. The results gathered in this study may provide a theoretical basis and data to support research into porous scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Griffith LG, Naughton G (2002) Tissue engineering: current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 295(5557):1009–101410.1126/science.1069210 ↗
2. Jiang YC, Lin J, An H, Wang XF, Qian L, Turng LS (2017) Electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin composites with enhanced cell–matrix interactions as blood vessel endothelial layer scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 71:901–90810.1016/j.msec.2016.10.083 ↗
3. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–254310.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
4. Zhang C, Wang L, Zhai T, Wang X, Dan Y, Turng LS (2016) The surface grafting of graphene oxide with poly(ethylene glycol) as a reinforcement for poly(lactic acid) nanocomposite scaffolds for potential tissue engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53:403–41310.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.043 ↗
5. Bonfield W (2006) Designing porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Philos Trans 364(1838):227–23210.1098/rsta.2005.1692 ↗
6. Mi HY, Jing X, Salick MR, Cordie TM, Peng XF, Turng LS (2014) Morphology, mechanical properties, and mineralization of rigid thermoplastic polyurethane/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue applications: effects of fabrication approaches and hydroxyapatite size. J Mater Sci 49(5):2324–2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7931-310.1007/s10853-013-7931-3 ↗
7. Huang A, Jiang Y, Napiwocki B, Mi H, Peng X, Turng LS (2017) Fabrication of poly(ε-caprolactone) tissue engineering scaffolds with fibrillated and interconnected pores utilizing microcellular injection molding and polymer leaching. RSC Adv 7(69):43432–4344410.1039/C7RA06987A ↗
8. Gao Q, Gu H, Zhao P, Zhang C, Cao M, Fu J, He Y (2018) Fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with 3D controllable geometric shapes. Mater Des 157:159–16910.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.042 ↗
9. Zhao P, Cao M, Gu H, Gao Q, Xia N, He Y, Fu J (2018) Research on the electrospun foaming process to fabricate three-dimensional tissue engineering scaffolds. J Appl Polym Sci 135(46):4689810.1002/app.46898 ↗
10. Jiang L, Wang L, Wang N, Gong S, Wang L, Li Q, Shen C, Turng LS (2017) Fabrication of polycaprolactone electrospun fibers with different hierarchical structures mimicking collagen fibrils for tissue engineering scaffolds. Appl Surf Sci 427:311–32510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.005 ↗
11. Sun S, Li Q, Zhao N, Jiang J, Zhang K, Hou J, Wang X, Liu G (2018) Preparation of highly interconnected porous poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(lactic acid) scaffolds via supercritical foaming. Polym Adv Technol 29(12):3065–307410.1002/pat.4427 ↗
12. Rouholamin D, Smith PJ, Ghassemieh E (2013) Control of morphological properties of porous biodegradable scaffolds processed by supercritical CO2 foaming. J Mater Sci 48(8):3254–3263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7109-410.1007/s10853-012-7109-4 ↗
13. Nie J, Gao Q, Qiu JJ, Sun M, Liu A, Shao L, Fu JZ, Zhao P, He Y (2018) 3D printed Lego®-like modular microfluidic devices based on capillary driving. Biofabrication 10(3):03500110.1088/1758-5090/aaadd3 ↗
14. Zhao H, Chen Y, Shao L, Xie M, Nie J, Qiu J, Zhao P, Ramezani H, Fu J, Ouyang H, He Y (2018) Airflow-assisted 3D bioprinting of human heterogeneous microspheroidal organoids with microfluidic nozzle. Small 14(39):180263010.1002/smll.201802630 ↗
15. Yan S, Zhang X, Zhang L, Liu H, Wang X, Li Q (2017) Polymer scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering fabricated by combined electrospinning and hot embossing. Biomed Mater 13(1):01500310.1088/1748-605X/aa8a81 ↗
16. Huaguo L, Yingjun W, Chengyun N, Huade Z (2007) Preparation of poly(ε-caprolactone) tissue engineering scaffold by freeze-drying/particle-leaching method. Mater Rev 2:032
17. Kuang T, Chen F, Chang L, Zhao Y, Fu D, Gong X, Peng X (2017) Facile preparation of open-cellular porous poly (l-lactic acid) scaffold by supercritical carbon dioxide foaming for potential tissue engineering applications. Chem Eng J 307:1017–102510.1016/j.cej.2016.09.023 ↗
18. Reignier J, Huneault MA (2006) Preparation of interconnected poly(ε-caprolactone) porous scaffolds by a combination of polymer and salt particulate leaching. Polymer 47(13):4703–471710.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.029 ↗
19. Jing X, Mi HY, Cordie T, Salick M, Peng XF, Turng LS (2014) Fabrication of porous poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds containing chitosan nanofibers by combining extrusion foaming, leaching, and freeze-drying methods. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(46):17909–1791810.1021/ie5034073 ↗
20. Zhao N, Zhu C, Howe Mark L, Park CB, Li Q (2015) Batch foaming poly(vinyl alcohol)/microfibrillated cellulose composites with CO2 and water as co-blowing agents. J Appl Polym Sci 132(48):4255110.1002/app.42551 ↗
21. Goel SK, Beckman EJ (1994) Generation of microcellular polymeric foams using supercritical carbon dioxide 1-effect of pressure and temperature on nucleation. Polym Eng Sci 34:1137–114610.1002/pen.760341407 ↗
22. Goel SK, Beckman EJ (1994) Generation of microcellular polymeric foams usingsupercritical carbon dioxide 2-cell growth and skin formation. Polym Eng Sci 34:1148–115610.1002/pen.760341408 ↗
23. White LJ, Hutter V, Tai H, Howdle SM, Shakesheff KM (2012) The effect of processing variables on morphological and mechanical properties of supercritical CO2 foamed scaffolds for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8(1):61–7110.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.032 ↗
24. Gualandi C, White LJ, Chen L, Gross RA, Shakesheff KM, Howdle SM, Scandola M (2010) Scaffold for tissue engineering fabricated by non-isothermal supercritical carbon dioxide foaming of a highly crystalline polyester. Acta Biomater 6(1):130–13610.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.020 ↗
25. Chen CX, Liu QQ, Xin X, Guan YX, Yao SJ (2016) Pore formation of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds with melting point reduction in supercritical CO2 foaming. J Supercrit Fluids 117:279–28810.1016/j.supflu.2016.07.006 ↗
26. Nemiroski A, Soh S, Kwok SW, Yu HD, Whitesides GM (2016) Tilted magnetic levitation enables measurement of the complete range of densities of materials with low magnetic permeability. J Am Chem Soc 138(4):1252–125710.1021/jacs.5b10936 ↗
27. Zhang C, Zhao P, Gu F, Xie J, Xia N, He Y, Fu J (2018) A single ring magnetic levitation configuration for object manipulation and density-based measurement. Anal Chem 90(15):9226–923310.1021/acs.analchem.8b01724 ↗
28. Zhang C, Zhao PW, Xie J, Xia N, Fu J (2018) Density measurement via magnetic levitation: linear relationship investigation. Polym Test 70:520–52510.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.08.010 ↗
29. Rizvi A, Chu RK, Lee JH, Park CB (2014) Superhydrophobic and oleophilic open-cell foams from fibrillar blends of polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(23):21131–2114010.1021/am506006v ↗
30. Wang X, Li H (2001) Compatibilizing effect of ethylene-vinyl acetate-acrylic acid copolymer on nylon 6/ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer blended system: mechanical properties, morphology and rheology. J Mater Sci 36(22):5465–5473. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101243783247910.1023/A:1012437832479 ↗
31. González J, Rosales C, González M, León N, Escalona R, Rojas H (2017) Rheological and mechanical properties of blends of LDPE with high contents of UHMWPE wastes. J Appl Polym Sci 134(26):4499610.1002/app.44996 ↗
32. Friedrich C, Braun H (1992) Generalized Cole–Cole behavior and its rheological relevance. Rheol Acta 31(4):309–32210.1007/BF00418328 ↗
33. Liao R, Yu W, Zhou C (2010) Rheological control in foaming polymeric materials: I. Amorphous polymers. Polymer 51(2):568–58010.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.063 ↗
34. Liao R, Yu W, Zhou C (2010) Rheological control in foaming polymeric materials: II. Semi-crystalline polymers. Polymer 51(26):6334–634510.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.001 ↗
35. Emami M, Thompson MR, Vlachopoulos J (2014) Experimental and numerical studies on bubble dynamics in nonpressurized foaming systems. Polym Eng Sci 54(8):1947–195910.1002/pen.23737 ↗
36. Zeltinger J, Sherwood J, Graham D, Mueller R, Griffith L (2001) Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A 7(5):557–57210.1089/107632701753213183 ↗
37. Chen S, Zhang Q, Nakamoto T, Kawazoe N, Chen G (2016) Gelatin scaffolds with controlled pore structure and mechanical property for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 22(3):189–19810.1089/ten.tec.2015.0281 ↗
38. Markočič E, Škerget M, Knez Ž (2013) Effect of temperature and pressure on the behavior of poly(ε-caprolactone) in the presence of supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(44):15594–1560110.1021/ie402256a ↗
39. Ivanovic J, Knauer S, Fanovich A, Milovanovic S, Stamenic M, Jaeger P, Zizovic I, Eggers R (2016) Supercritical CO2 sorption kinetics and thymol impregnation of PCL and PCL-HA. J Supercrit Fluids 107(93):486–49810.1016/j.supflu.2015.07.001 ↗
40. Yang C, Kang YQ, Liao XM, Yao YD, Huang ZB, Yin GF (2010) Preparation of PLGA/β-TCP composite scaffolds with supercritical CO2 foaming technique. Front Mater Sci Chin 4(3):314–32010.1007/s11706-010-0081-5 ↗
41. Yu J, Xia H, Ni QQ (2018) A three-dimensional porous hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold with shape memory effect for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 53(7):4734–4744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1807-x10.1007/s10853-017-1807-x ↗
42. Leung SN, Wong A, Wang LC, Park CB (2012) Mechanism of extensional stress-induced cell formation in polymeric foaming processes with the presence of nucleating agents. J Supercrit Fluids 63:187–19810.1016/j.supflu.2011.12.018 ↗