Synthesis and characterization of reinforced acrylate photosensitive resin by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-functionalized graphene nanosheets for 3D printing
Source abstract
Abstract
The acrylate photosensitive resin hybrids containing 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-functionalized graphene oxide (HEMA-g-GO/PRFRPCP) were prepared. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate-grafted graphene oxide (HEMA-g-GO) was synthesized by in situ covalent functionalization of graphene oxide (GO) with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). The effects of HEMA-g-GO on the properties of the photosensitive resin were evaluated through evaluating the variation in viscosity and gel rate. Compared with GO, HEMA-g-GO addition doesn’t more markedly increase the viscosity and also doesn’t reduce the gel rate until the addition amount of HEMA-g-GO reaches 0.06 wt% in the resin. The best result of 3.6% volume shrinkage for the nanocomposite cured with UV irradiation from the resin hybrid HEMA-g-GO/PRFRPCP containing 0.06 wt% HEMA-g-GO was obtained. The nanocomposites show the enhancement in mechanical properties and thermal properties even with very small HEMA-g-GO additions (0.01–0.06 wt%). Furthermore, the behaviors of the nanocomposites under dynamic thermal conditions were examined with dynamic thermomechanical analysis, confirming that there is the excellent interfacial adhesion between HEMA-g-GO and the resin matrix which is responsible for the enhanced properties of the nanocomposites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Hull CW (1996) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. U.S. Patent 4,575,330
2. Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing: fundamentals of stereolithography. Society of Manufactuting Engineers Publishers, Dearborn
3. Nee AYC, Fuh JYH, Miyazawa T (2001) On the improvement of the stereolithography (SL) process. J Mater Process Technol 113(1):262–268
4. Manapat JZ, Chen QY, Ye PR, Advincula RC (2017) 3D Printing of polymer nanocomposites via stereolithography. Macromol Mater Eng. doi: 10.1002/mame.20160055310.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
5. Karalekas D, Aggelopoulos A (2003) Study of shrinkage strains in a stereolithography cured acrylic photopolymer resin. J Mater Process Technol 136:146–15010.1016/S0924-0136(03)00028-1 ↗
6. Fuh JYH, Lu L, Tan CC, Shen ZX, Chew S (1999) Processing and characterising photo-sensitive polymer in the stereolithography process. J Mater Process Technol 89–90(8):211–21710.1016/S0924-0136(99)00073-4 ↗
7. Dewaele M, Truffier-Boutry D, Leloup G, Devaux J (2005) Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage—conversion relationship revisited. Eur Cells Mater 9:66–67
8. Fuh JYH, Lu L, Tan CC, Shen ZX, Chew S (1999) Curing characteristics of acrylic photopolymer used in stereolithography process. Rapid Prototyp J 5:127–134
9. Andrzejewska E (2001) Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci 26(4):605–66510.1016/S0079-6700(01)00004-1 ↗
10. Chen M, Chen Q, Xiao S, Hong X (2001) The mechanism and application of hybrid UV curing system. Photogr Sci Photochem 19(3):208–216
11. Sipani V, Scranton AB (2003) Dark-cure studies of cationic photopolymerizations of epoxide characterization of the active center lifetime and kinetic rate constants. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 41(13):2064–207210.1002/pola.10750 ↗
12. Cho JD, Hong JW (2004) UV-initiated free radical and cationic photopolymerizations acrylate/epoxide and acrylate/vinyl ether hybrid systems with and without photosensitizer. J Appl Polym Sci 93(3):1473–148310.1002/app.20597 ↗
13. Zak G, Chan AYF, Park CB et al (1996) Viscosity analysis of photopolymer and glass fibercomposites for rapid layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 23:16–2310.1108/13552549610129773 ↗
14. Karrer P, Corbel S, Andre JC et al (1992) Shrinkage effects in photopolymerizable resins containing filling agents: application to stereo photo-lithography. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 30(13):2715–272310.1002/pola.1992.080301307 ↗
15. Duan Y, Wang S, Li D et al (2001) Shrinkage effects in photopolymerizable resin containing polymer filler for SL. Mater Sci Eng 19(2):39–43
16. Liu Y, Wang A, Zhu L, Wang B (2009) Research on influencing factor of mechanical properties of SiC whisker toughened photosensitive resins. Ordnance Mater Sci Eng 32(6):66–70
17. Duan Y, Zhou Y, Tang Y, Li D (2011) Nano-TiO2-modified photosensitive resin for RP. Rapid Prototyp J 17(4):247–25210.1108/13552541111138360 ↗
18. Salmoriaa GV, Ahrens CH (2009) Evaluation of post-curing and laser manufacturing parameters on the properties of SOMOS 7110 photosensitive resin used in stereolithography. Mater Des 30:758–76310.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.016 ↗
19. Szaloki M, Gall J, Bukovinszki K (2013) Synthesis and characterization of cross-linked polymeric nanoparticles and their composites for reinforcement of photocurable dental resin. React Funct Polym 73:465–47310.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.11.013 ↗
20. Marcos N, Santos D, Opelt CV, Lafratta FH (2011) Thermal and mechanical properties of a nanocomposite of a photocurable epoxy-acrylate resin and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng 528:4318–432410.1016/j.msea.2011.02.036 ↗
21. Sadej M, Andrzejewska E (2016) Silica/aluminum oxide hybrid as a filler for photocurable composites. Prog Org Coat 94:1–810.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.01.008 ↗
22. Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H (2012) Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev 41(2):666–68610.1039/C1CS15078B ↗
23. Acquah SFA, Leonhardt BE, Nowotarski MS et al (2016) Carbon nanotubes and graphene as additives in 3D printing. In: Berber MR, Hafez IH (eds) Nanotubes-current progress of their polymer composites. Intech, Croatia, pp 227–253
24. Lim SM, Shin BS, Kim K (2017) Characterization of products using additive manufacturing with graphene/photopolymer-resin nano-fluid. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 17(8):5492–549510.1166/jnn.2017.14159 ↗
25. Lin D, Jin S, Zhang F, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhou C, Cheng GJ (2015) 3D stereolithography printing of graphene oxide reinforced complex architectures. Nanotechnology 26:434003–43401110.1088/0957-4484/26/43/434003 ↗
26. Korhonen H, Sinh LH, Luong ND et al (2016) Fabrication of graphene-based 3D structures by stereolithography. Phys Status Solidi A 213(4):982–98510.1002/pssa.201532761 ↗
27. Kusmartsev FV, Wu WM, Pierpoint MP, Yung KC (2014) Current topics in applied spectroscopy and the science of nanomaterials. In: Misra P (ed) Progress in optical science and photonics. Springer, New York, p 191
28. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphite oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339–1334810.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
29. Nikdel M, Salami-Kalajahi M, Hosseiniab MS (2014) Synthesis of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-coacrylic acid)-grafted graphene oxide nanosheets via reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. RSC Adv 4:16743–1675010.1039/c4ra01701c ↗
30. Pham TA, Kim JS, Cho BG, Son SM, Jeong YT (2011) Facile preparation of water-dispersible adenosine-functionalized graphene nanosheets. Synth React Inorg Met Org Nano Met Chem 41:1257–126210.1080/15533174.2011.591879 ↗
31. Eigler S, Dotzer C, Hirsch A, Enzelberger M, Müller P (2012) Formation and decomposition of CO2 intercalated graphene oxide. Chem Mater 24:1276–128210.1021/cm203223z ↗
32. Zhang F, Xu H, Yue D, Zhou Z (2013) Graphene covalently modified by DNA G-Base. J Phys Chem C 117:3513–351910.1021/jp307298p ↗
33. Flach L, Chartoff RP (1994) A simple polymer shrinkage model applied to stereolithography. In: Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 225–233
34. Karalekas D, Rapti D, Gdoutos EE, Aggelopoulos A (2002) Investigation of shrinkage-induced stresses in stereolithography photo-curable resins. Exp Mech 42(4):439–44410.1007/BF02412150 ↗
35. Chen MH, Chen CR, Hsu SH, Sun SP, Su WF (2006) Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material. Dent Mater 22:138–14510.1016/j.dental.2005.02.012 ↗
36. Dai YT, Qiu FX, Xu JC, Yu ZP, Yang PF, Xu BB, Jiang Y, Yang DY (2014) Preparation and properties of UV-curable waterborne graphene oxide/polyurethane acrylate composites. Plast Rubber Compos 43:54–6210.1179/1743289813Y.0000000071 ↗
37. Kuila T, Khanra P, Kim NH et al (2011) Characterization and properties of in situ emulsion polymerized poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci 42(11):1856–186110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.014 ↗
38. Li J, Wang R, Wang T, Gu S, Lv Z, Chen T (2014) Preparation and properties of graphene/cyanate ester resin-epoxy resin composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin 31(5):1154–1159
39. Castro DT, Valente MLC, Silva CHL (2016) Evaluation of antibiofilm and mechanical properties of new nanocomposites based on acrylic resins and silver vanadate nanoparticles. Arch Oral Biol 67:46–5510.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.03.002 ↗
40. Zhang J, Liu SC, Lu YP (2016) Fabrication process and bending properties of carbon fibers reinforced Al-alloy matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 231:366–37310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.007 ↗
41. Richard IV, Hatch RH, Stegall DM (2016) Strengths of additions to composite or resin-modified glass-ionomer. Int J Adhes 69:86–9710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.017 ↗