journal article·2006-08-29

The elastic modulus of spruce wood cell wall material measured by an in situ bending technique

Steffen Orso, Ulrike G. K. Wegst, Eduard Arzt

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Using a novel in situ testing technique, the elastic modulus of wood cell wall material can be determined with great accuracy. The method relies on a focussed ion beam system (FIB) to prepare samples from individual structural components at a length scale which otherwise is hardly, if at all, accessible for testing. To determine the elastic modulus of cell wall material, cantilevers are cut with the FIB from wood cells for beam bending experiments inside the FIB or a scanning electron microscope (SEM). This type of sample preparation is site-specific and, at the same time, minimises the usual sample mounting problems. Once cut, the cantilever is tested by applying a known force with a piezoresistive AFM tip that is mounted on a micromanipulator. The resulting displacement is determined from SEM micrographs taken during the test. The cross-sectional area of the cantilever is determined for a number of positions along its length using the FIB as a cutting tool. Applying this method, we measured the elastic modulus of spruce wood cell wall material to be ∼28 GPa.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Bamboo properties and applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Dinwoodie JM (2000) In: Timber, its nature and behaviour, 2nd edn. E & FN Spon, London, New York, p 24
2. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F, Winkler K, Bain R (1972) Pulp Paper Mag Can 73:72
3. Groom L, Mott L, Shaler SM (2002) Wood Fiber Sci 34:14
4. Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2003) Holzforschung 57:66110.1515/HF.2003.099 ↗
5. Burgert I, Eder M, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2005) Holzforschung 59:35410.1515/HF.2005.058 ↗
6. Burgert I, Gierlinger N, Zimmermann T (2005) Holzforschung 59:24010.1515/HF.2005.038 ↗
7. Gindl W, Schöberl T (2004) Composites: Part A 35:134510.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.002 ↗
8. Gindl W, Gupta HS, Schöberl T, Lichtenegger HC, Fratzl P (2004) Appl Phys A 79:206910.1007/s00339-004-2864-y ↗
9. FEI Company, 5350 NE Dawson Creek Drive, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124, USA
10. Carl Zeiss SMT AG, Carl Zeiss-Str. 22, D-73447 Oberkochen, Germany
11. Nascatec GmbH, Ludwig-Erhard-Straße 10, D-34131 Kassel, Germany
12. Kleindiek Nanotechnik GmbH, Aspenhaustrasse 25, D-72770 Reutlingen, Germany
13. Orso S, Wegst UGK, Eberl C, Arzt E (2006) Adv Mat 18:87410.1002/adma.200501807 ↗
14. BIOPAC Systems, Inc. (Model MP100A-CE), 42 Aero Camino, Goleta, CA 93117, USA
15. Bennet J, AutoIt TEAM, “AutoIt” (Version v3.0.102, 2004), http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/, as on 01 March 2006
16. “Corel DRAW 10”, Corel UK Ltd., Sapphire Court, Bell Street, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 1BU, UK
17. Skaar C (1988) In: Wood-water relations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 4210.1007/978-3-642-73683-4 ↗
18. Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2005) Holzforschung 59:24710.1515/HF.2005.039 ↗