Silica–silane coupling agent interphase properties using molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, strength of the interphase between silica and glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (GPS) coupling agent has been studied using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Silica–GPS interphase model is created by coupling the hydroxylated silica surface with monolayer-hydroxylated GPS molecules. The interphase model is subjected to mode-I (normal), mode-II (shear) and mixed-mode (normal–shear) mechanical loading to determine the interphase cohesive traction–separation (T–S) response (i.e., cohesive traction law). In MD simulations, atomic interactions are modeled with the reactive force field ReaxFF. Effects of interphase thickness and GPS bond density on the T–S response are studied. Simulation results indicate that interphase strength decreases with increase in the interphase thickness before attaining a plateau level at higher thickness. For a particular thickness, strength improves significantly with increase in the GPS bond density with the silica surface. Damage mode is adhesive at the silica interface at lower thickness and transitions to mixed mode and cohesive failure within the silane interphase at higher thickness. Mixed-mode T–S responses are bounded by the mode-I and mode-II responses. Characteristic parameters of the continuum-level potential-based cohesive zone model (PPR–CZM) are determined by fitting the MD-based mode-I and mode-II T–S responses with PPR–CZM functional. Development of the PPR–CZM parameters enables bridging length scales from the MD to the continuum scale for fracture modeling of the fiber–matrix interphase in composites subjected to mixed-mode loading. Results on mode-I and mode-II unloading are also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Numerical methods in engineering · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Loewenstein KL (1993) The manufacturing technology of continuous glass fibers, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New York
2. Gorowara RL, Kosik WE, Mcknight SH, Mccullough RL (2001) Molecular characterization of glass fiber surface coatings for thermosetting polymer matrix/glass fiber composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:323–32910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00112-3 ↗
3. Mäder E, Jacobasch HJ, Grundke K, Gietzelt T (1996) Influence of an optimized interphase on the properties of polypropylene/glass fiber composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:907–91210.1016/1359-835X(96)00044-9 ↗
4. Thomason JL, Adzima LJ (2001) Sizing up the interphase: an insider’s guide to the science of sizing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:313–32110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X ↗
5. Gao X (2006) Tailored interphase structure for improved strength and energy absorption of composites. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware, USA
6. Tanoglu M, Mcknight SH, Palmese GR, Gillespie JW Jr (2001) The effects of glass fiber sizings on the strength and energy absorption of the fiber/matrix interphase under high loading rates. Compos Sci Technol 61:205–22010.1016/S0266-3538(00)00195-0 ↗
7. Wu HF, Dwight DW, Huff NT (1997) Effects of silane coupling agents on the interphase and performance of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 57:975–98310.1016/S0266-3538(97)00033-X ↗
8. Berg J, Jones FR (1998) The role of sizing resins, coupling agents and their blends on the formation of the interphase in glass fiber composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 29:1261–127210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00091-8 ↗
9. DiBenedetto AT (2001) Tailoring of interfaces in glass fiber reinforced polymer composites: a review. Mater Sci Eng, A 302:74–8210.1016/S0921-5093(00)01357-5 ↗
10. Thomason JL, Dwight DW (1999) The use of XPS for characterization of glass fiber coatings. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30:1401–141310.1016/S1359-835X(99)00042-1 ↗
11. Pavlovic E, Kramer EJ (2011) Curing temperature effects on network structure and chemistry of silane coupling agent layers and their influence on water-assisted crack growth. J Adhes 87:272–28910.1080/00218464.2011.557346 ↗
12. Jensen RE, Palmese GR, McKnight SH (2006) Viscoelastic properties of alkoxy silane-epoxy interpenetrating networks. Int J Adhes Adhes 26:103–11510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.004 ↗
13. Fogarty JC, Aktulga HM, Grama AY, van Duin ACT, Pandit SA (2010) A reactive molecular dynamics simulation of the silica-water interface. J Chem Phys 132:17470410.1063/1.3407433 ↗
14. Leroch S, Wendland M (2012) Simulation of forces between humid amorphous silica surfaces: a comparison of empirical atomistic force field. J Phys Chem C 116:26247–2626110.1021/jp302428b ↗
15. Bourg IC, Steefe CI (2012) Molecular dynamics simulations of water structure and diffusion in silica nanopores. J Phys Chem C116:11556–11564
16. Chowdhury SC, Haque BZ, Gillespie Jr JW, Chantawansri TL, Rosch T, Karkkainen RL (2013) Molecular simulations of silica surface in presence of water. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 28th technical conference, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
17. Park K, Paulino GH, Roesler JR (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–90810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
18. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
19. Senftle TP, Hong S, Islam MM, Kylasa SB, Zheng Y, Shin YK, Junkermeier C, Engel-Herbert R, Janik MJ, Aktulga HM, Verstraelen T, Grama A, van Duin ACT (2016) The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions. NPJ Comput Mater 2:1501110.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11 ↗
20. Chowdhury SC, Haque BZ, Gillespie JW Jr (2016) Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF. J Mater Sci 51:10139–1015910.1007/s10853-016-0242-8 ↗
21. ReaxFF manual. http://www.engr.psu.edu/adri/ReaxffManual.aspx . Accessed May 17 2017
22. Zhang W, van Duin ACT (2015) ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulation of functionalized polyphenylene oxide anion exchange membrane. J Phys Chem A 119:27727–27736
23. Monti S, Corozzi A, Fristrup P, Joshi KL, Shin YK, Oelschlaeger P, van Duin ACT, Barone V (2013) Exploring the conformational and reactive dynamics of biomolecules in solution using an extended version of the glycine reactive force field. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:15062–1507710.1039/c3cp51931g ↗
24. Pitman MC, van Duin ACT (2012) Dynamics of confined reactive water in smectite clay − zeolite composites. J Am Chem Soc 134:3042–305310.1021/ja208894m ↗
25. Chowdhury SC, Sockalingam S, Gillespie JW Jr (2017) Molecular dynamics modeling of the effect of axial and transverse compression on the residual tensile properties of ballistic fiber. Fibers. doi: 10.3390/fib501000710.3390/fib5010007 ↗
26. Chowdhury SC, Robert RM, Sirk TW, van Duin ACT, Gillespie Jr JW. Modeling of glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane compositions using molecular dynamics simulations. (In review)
27. Sockalingam S, Dey M, Gillespie JW Jr, Keefe M (2014) Finite element analysis of the microdroplet test method using cohesive zone model of the fiber/matrix interface. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 56:239–24710.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.021 ↗