Modeling of soft impingement effect during solid-state partitioning phase transformations in binary alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The soft impingement effect at the later stage of partitioning phase transformations has been modeled both for the diffusion-controlled growth model and for the mixed-mode model. Instead of the linear and exponential approximations for the concentration gradient in front of the interface used in the past, a general polynomial method of dealing with the diffusion field is proposed. The linear and exponential diffusion field approximations are two specific cases of the polynomial diffusion field approximation. The effect of soft impingement on the overall partitioning phase transformation is only related to the degree of the super-saturation in case of the diffusion-controlled growth model, while it is determined by both the growth mode and the degree of super-saturation in case of the mixed-mode model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Zener C (1949) J Appl Phys 20:95010.1063/1.1698258 ↗
2. Christian JW (2003) Theory of transformations in metal and alloys, part I. Pergamon Press, Oxford
3. Sietsma J, van der Zwaag S (2004) Acta Mater 52:414310.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.027 ↗
4. Krielaart GP, Sietsma J, van der Zwaag S (1997) Mater Sci Eng A 237:21610.1016/S0921-5093(97)00365-1 ↗
5. Huizenga RM, Bos C, Sietsma J (2008) J Mater Sci 43:3744. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2219-010.1007/s10853-007-2219-0 ↗
6. Wert C, Zener C (1950) J Appl Phys 21:510.1063/1.1699422 ↗
7. Fan K, Liu F, Liu XN, Zhang YX, Yang GC, Zhou YH (2008) Acta Mater 56:430910.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.053 ↗
8. Offerman SE, van Dijk NH, Sietsma J, Lauridsen EM, Margulies L, Grigull S, Poulsen HF, van der Zwaag S (2004) Acta Mater 52:475710.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.030 ↗
9. Offerman SE, van Dijk NH, Sietsma J, Grigull S, Lauridsen EM, Margulies L, Poulsen HF, Rekveldt MT, van der Zwaag S (2002) Science 298:100310.1126/science.1076681 ↗
10. Schmidt ED, Damm EB, Sridhar S (2007) Metall Mater Trans A 38A:69810.1007/s11661-007-9208-4 ↗
11. Chen H, Liu YC, Yan ZS, Li YL, Zhang LF (2010) Appl Phys A 98:21110.1007/s00339-009-5375-z ↗
12. Crespo D, Pradell T, ClavagueraMora MT, Clavaguera N (1997) Phys Rev B 55:343510.1103/PhysRevB.55.3435 ↗
13. Wang HF, Liu F, Zhang T, Yang GC, Zhou YH (2009) Acta Mater 57:307210.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.010 ↗
14. Bos C, Sietsma J (2007) Scripta Mater 57:108510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.030 ↗
15. Vander Ven A, Delaey L (1996) Prog Mater Sci 40:18110.1016/0079-6425(96)00002-3 ↗
16. Pernach M, Pietrzyk M (2008) Comput Mater Sci 44:78310.1016/j.commatsci.2008.05.035 ↗
17. Chen H, van der Zwaag S (2010) Comput Mater Sci 49:80110.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.026 ↗
18. Strandlund H, Odqvist J, Agren J (2008) Comput Mater Sci 44:26510.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.030 ↗
19. Hillert M, Hoglund L (2006) Scripta Mater 54:125910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.023 ↗
20. Gamsjager E, Militzer M, Fazeli F, Svoboda J, Fisher FD (2006) Comput Mater Sci 37:9410.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.011 ↗