Sensitivity and dynamic electrical response of CNT-reinforced nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
A series of dynamic compressive experiments were performed to experimentally investigate the electrical response of multi-wall carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites subjected to split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) loading. Low-resistance CNT/epoxy specimens were fabricated using a combination of shear mixing and ultrasonication. Utilizing the CNT network within, the electrical resistance of the nanocomposite was monitored using a high-resolution four-point probe method during each compressive loading event. In addition, real-time deformation images were captured using high-speed photography. The percent change in resistance was correlated to both strain and real-time damage. The results were then compared to previous work conducted by the authors (quasi-static and drop weight impact) in order to elucidate the strain rate sensitivity on the electrical behavior of the material. Furthermore, the percent change in conductivity was determined using a Taylor expansion model to investigate the electrical response based on both dimensional change as well as resistivity change during mechanical loading within the elastic regime. Experimental findings indicate that the electrical resistance is a function of both the strain and deformation mechanisms induced by the loading. The bulk electrical resistance of the nanocomposites exhibited an overall decrease of 40–65% and 115–120% during quasi-static/drop weight and SHPB experiments, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Kang I, Heung YY, Kim JH, Lee JW, Gollapudi R, Subramaniam S, Narasimhadevara S, Hurd D, Kirikera GR, Shanov V, Schulz MJ, Shi D, Boerio J, Mall S, Ruggles-Wren M (2006) Compos B 37(6):38210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.011 ↗
2. You KM, Park SS, Lee CS, Kim JM, Park GP, Kim WN (2011) J Mater Sci 46(21):6850. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5645-y10.1007/s10853-011-5645-y ↗
3. Sumfleth J, Buschhorn ST, Schulte K (2011) J Mater Sci 46(3):659. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4788-610.1007/s10853-010-4788-6 ↗
4. Dash MP, Tripathy M, Sasmal A, Mohanty GC, Nayak PL (2010) J Mater Sci 45(14):3858. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4441-410.1007/s10853-010-4441-4 ↗
5. Park C, Onuaies Z, Watson KA, Pawlowski K, Lowther SE, Connell JW, Siochi EJ, Harrison JS, St. Clair TL (2002) In: Materials Research Society symposium proceedings, vol 706. Material Research Society, Warrendale10.1557/PROC-706-Z3.30.1 ↗
6. Dalton AB, Collins S, Razal J, Munoz E, Ebron VH, Kim BG, Coleman JN, Ferraris JP, Baughman RH (2004) J Mater Chem 14:110.1039/b312092a ↗
7. Li C, Thostenson ET, Chou TW (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68(6):122710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.006 ↗
8. Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou TW (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61(13):189910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
9. Allaoui A, Bai S, Cheng HM, Bai JB (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62(15):199310.1016/S0266-3538(02)00129-X ↗
10. Guo P, Chen X, Gao X, Song H, Shen H (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67(15–16):333110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.026 ↗
11. Bezryadin A, Verschueren A, Tans S, Dekker C (1998) Phys Rev Lett 80:403610.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4036 ↗
12. Paulson S et al (1999) Appl Phys Lett 75:293610.1063/1.125193 ↗
13. Alexopoulos ND, Bartholome C, Poulin P, Marioli-Riga Z (2009) Compos Sci Technol 70(2):26010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.017 ↗
14. Nofar M, Hoa SV, Pugh MD (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69(10):159910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.010 ↗
15. Gao L, Thostenson ET, Zhang Z, Chou TW (2009) Carbon 47(5):138110.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.030 ↗
16. Gao L, Chou TW, Thostenson ET, Zhang Z (2010) Carbon 48(13):378810.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.041 ↗
17. Thostenson ET, Chou TW (2006) Adv Mater 18:283710.1002/adma.200600977 ↗
18. Lim AS, An Q, Chou TW, Thostenson ET (2011) Compos Sci Technol 71(5):61610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.025 ↗
19. Heeder N, Shukla A, Chalivendra V, Yang S, Park K (2011) Exp Mech. doi: 10.1007/s11340-011-9488-x
20. Kabir ME, Saha MC, Jeelani S (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 459(1–2):11110.1016/j.msea.2007.01.031 ↗
21. Evora VMF, Shukla A (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 361(1–2):35810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00536-7 ↗
22. Ma P, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J (2010) Compos A 41(10):134510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗