journal article·2008-07

Effects of fiber surface treatments on mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with glass fabric

Kutlay Sever, Mehmet Sarikanat, Yoldas Seki, Volkan Cecen, Ismail H. Tavman

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, effects of fiber surface treatments on mechanical behavior and fracture mechanism of glass fiber/epoxy composites were investigated experimentally. To change the composition of the glass and regenerate to the hydroxyl groups, activation pretreatment of heat cleaned woven glass fabric was performed using (v/v) HCl aqueous solution at different concentrations before silane treatment. The treatment of silanization of heat cleaned and acid activated glass fibers with γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane were performed. In this work, short beam shear test has been conducted to determine the performance of the acid treatment and the silane treatment in terms of the interlaminar shear strength. The silane coating on the heat cleaned glass fibers increased the interlaminar shear strength of the composite. However, the silane coating on the acid activated glass fibers did not improve the interlaminar shear strength of the composite. In addition, the strengths of the glass fabric specimens in tension and flexure were investigated. When the glass fibers are first treated with HCl solution and then with silane coupling agent, the tensile strengths of the composites decreased significantly. Scanning electron photomicrographs of fractured surfaces of composites were performed to explain the failure mechanisms in the composite laminates broken in tension.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Park SJ, Jin JS (2003) J Polym Sci Pol Phys 41(1):55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1035910.1002/polb.10359 ↗
2. Vazquez A, Ambrustolo M, Moschiar SM, Reboredo AMM, Gcrard JF (1998) Compos Sci Technol 58(3–4):549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266–3538(97)00172-310.1016/S0266-3538(97)00172-3 ↗
3. Zhao FM, Takeda N (2000) Compos Part A Appl S 31(11):120310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00085-3 ↗
4. Ranade RA, Ding J, Wunder SL, Baran GR (2006) Compos Part A Appl S 37(11):201710.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.009 ↗
5. Cech V, Prikryl R, Balkova R, Vanek J, Grycova A (2003) J Adhes Sci Technol 17(10):1299 doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610376917275110.1163/156856103769172751 ↗
6. Li RZ, Ye L, Mai YW (1997) Compos Part A Appl S 28(1):7310.1016/S1359-835X(96)00097-8 ↗
7. Wang TWH, Blum FD, Dharani LR (1999) J Mater Sci 34(19):4873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100467621429010.1023/A:1004676214290 ↗
8. Saidpour SH, Richardson MOW (1997) Compos Part A Appl S 28(11):97l10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00071-7 ↗
9. Park SJ, Jin JS (2001) J Colloid Interface Sci 242(1):174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.778810.1006/jcis.2001.7788 ↗
10. Prikryl R, Cech V, Kripal L, Vanek J (2005) Int J Adhes Adhes 25(2):12110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.04.006 ↗
11. Cech V, Inagaki N, Vanek J, Prikryl R, Grycova A, Zemek J (2006) Thin Solid Films 502(1–2):181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.27110.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.271 ↗
12. Kim JK, Mai YW (1998) Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites. Elsevier, UK
13. Brill RP, Palmese GR (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 101(5):2784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2198110.1002/app.21981 ↗
14. Park R, Jang J (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 91(6):3730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1345410.1002/app.13454 ↗
15. González-Benito J, Baselga J, Aznar AJ (1999) J Mater Process Technol 93:129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00212-510.1016/S0924-0136(99)00212-5 ↗
16. Olmos D, Lopez-Moron R, González-Benito J (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66(15):2758. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.004 ↗
17. González-Benito J (2003) J Colloid Interface Sci 267(2):326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00550-210.1016/S0021-9797(03)00550-2 ↗
18. Tanaka H, Kuraoka K, Yamanaka H, Yazawa TJ (1997) Non-Cryst Solids 215(2–3):262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(97)00103-810.1016/S0022-3093(97)00103-8 ↗
19. Jones RL, Betz D (2004) J Mater Sci 39(18):5633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000040069.00158.0110.1023/B:JMSC.0000040069.00158.01 ↗
20. Qiu Q, Kumosa M (1997) Compos Sci Technol 57(5):497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00158-310.1016/S0266-3538(96)00158-3 ↗
21. Shih GC, Ebert LJ (1986) Composites 17(4):309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(86)90748-210.1016/0010-4361(86)90748-2 ↗
22. Iglesias JG, González-Benito J, Aznar AJ, Bravo J, Baselga J (2002) J Colloid Interface Sci 250(1):251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2002.833210.1006/jcis.2002.8332 ↗