Effects of Co additions on electromigration behaviors in Sn–3.0 Ag–0.5 Cu-based solder joint
Source abstract
Abstract
As the miniaturization trend of electronic packing industry, electromigration (EM) has become a critical issue for fine pitch packaging. The EM effects on microstructure evolution of intermetallic compound layer (IMC) in Sn–3.0 Ag–0.5 Cu + XCo (X = 0, 0.05, 0.2 wt%) solder joint was investigated. Findings of this study indicated that current stressing of Sn–3.0 Ag–0.5 Cu–0.2 Co solder joint with 104 A/cm2 at 50 °C for 16 days, no remarkable EM damages exhibited in solder matrix. Whereas, after current stressing at 150 °C for 1 and 3 days, Sn–3.0 Ag–0.5 Cu specimens showed obvious polarity effect between cathode and anode. Different morphology changes were also observed at both sides. After current stressing for 1 day, two IMC layers, Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn, with wave type morphology formed at cathode. Sn phases were also observed inside in the IMC layer. However, only Cu6Sn5 formed in anode. Three days later, Sn phases were found in anode. Besides, Co additions, aging treatment, Ag3Sn, and other IMCs improved the resistance of EM by the evidence of retarding polarity effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Tu KN (2003) J Appl Phys 94:545110.1063/1.1611263 ↗
2. Yeh ECC, Choi WJ, Tu KN, Elenius P, Balkan H (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:58010.1063/1.1432443 ↗
3. Chen C, Liang SW (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 18:25910.1007/s10854-006-9020-8 ↗
4. Guo F, Xu GC, Sun J, Xia ZD, Lei YP, Shi YW, Li XY (2009) J Electron Mater 38:275610.1007/s11664-009-0944-7 ↗
5. Chen CM, Chen SW (1999) J Electron Mater 28:90210.1007/s11664-999-0217-5 ↗
6. Gan H, Tu KN (2005) J Appl Phys 97:06351410.1063/1.1861151 ↗
7. Yeh YT, Chou CK, Hsu YC, Chen C, Tu KN (2005) Appl Phys Lett 86:20350410.1063/1.1929870 ↗
8. Yeh EC, Choi WJ, Tu KN, Elenius P, Balkan H (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:58010.1063/1.1432443 ↗
9. Xu GC, Guo F, Zhu WR (2009) Int J Min Met Mater 16:685
10. Ho CE, Yang SC, Kao CR (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 18:174
11. Ho CE, Lee A, Subramanian KN (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 18:56910.1007/s10854-007-9263-z ↗
12. Tsai CM, Lin YL, Tsai JY, Lai YS, Kao CR (2006) J Electron Mater 35:100510.1007/BF02692560 ↗
13. Nah JW, Suh JO, Tu KN, Yoon SW, Chong CT, Kripesh V, Su BR, Chen C (2006) In: Proceedings of the 56th electronic components and technology conference. IEEE Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology Society, San Diego, CA
14. Ames I, d’Heurel FM, Horstman RE (1970) IBM J Res Dev 14:46110.1147/rd.144.0461 ↗
15. Guo F, Lee J, Choi S, Lucas JP, Bieler TR, Subramanian KN (2001) J Electron Mater 30:107310.1007/s11664-001-0132-x ↗
16. Anderson IE, Terpstra RL (15 May 2001) U.S. patent 6,231,691 B1
17. Magagnin L, Sirtori V, Seregni S, Origo A, Cavallotti PL (2005) Electrochim Acta 50:462110.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.098 ↗
18. He HW, Chen GC, Guo F (2009) J Mater Sci 44:2089. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3276-310.1007/s10853-009-3276-3 ↗
19. Zhang RH, Xu GC, Wang XT, Guo F, Lee A, Subramanian KN (2010) J Electron Mater 39:251310.1007/s11664-010-1377-z ↗
20. Chen SW, Chen YK, Wu HJ, Huang YC, Chen CM (2010) J Electron Mater 39(11):241810.1007/s11664-010-1337-7 ↗
21. Huang YC, Chen SW (2011) J Electron Mater 40(1):6210.1007/s11664-010-1386-y ↗
22. Lin JK, Jang JW, White J (2003) In: Proceedings of the 53rd electronic components and technology conference, 2003. IEEE Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology Society, New Orleans, LA. IEEE, New York, p 816
23. Tu KN, Lee TY, Jang JW, Li L, Frear DR, Zeng K, Kivilahti JK (2001) J Appl Phys 89:484310.1063/1.1357469 ↗