journal article·2013-02

High molecular weight plasticizers in thermoplastic starch/polyethylene blends

Ata Taghizadeh, Pierre Sarazin, Basil D. Favis

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study thermoplastic starch (TPS) was prepared with four different molecular weight polyol plasticizers: glycerol, sorbitol, diglycerol and polyglycerol. Diglycerol-TPS (DTPS) and polyglycerol-TPS (PTPS) show significantly lower moisture uptake and a higher temperature stability when compared to conventional glycerol-TPS (GTPS). TPS formulations were blended with HDPE at a concentration of 20 TPS/80 HDPE wt% and a range of interfacial modifier contents via a one-step extrusion process. The emulsification curves of the blends, which track the volume and number average diameter of the dispersed TPS domains with per cent interfacial modifier, show significantly different profiles and a non-correspondence between the d n and d v values at the critical concentration for interfacial saturation. The addition of small amounts of interfacial modifier to the blends prepared with diglycerol and polyglycerol results in TPS dispersed phases of wide polydispersity with droplets in the order of 200–300 nm coexisting with droplets of 5–7 µm. This wide polydispersity of TPS phase size can give insight into the mechanism of droplet formation in these systems with interfacial modifier and is indicative of an erosion-type mechanism, where small portions of the TPS droplet break off at the outer part of the droplet. Blends prepared with GTPS and sorbitol-TPS do not display this behaviour and show a more classic correspondence of d n and d v at the critical concentration. Dynamic mechanical analysis shows miscible behaviour for DTPS and PTPS and partially miscible behaviour for GTPS. This phenomenon was attributed to the presence of ether bonds in the chemical structure of diglycerol and polyglycerol. The increased chain flexibility and lower cohesive energy forces of diglycerol and polyglycerol lead to a more homogeneous TPS phase and consequently an erosion-type compatibilization at the interface. The mechanical properties of blends prepared with polyglycerol and diglycerol show a similar overall behaviour to glycerol.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Burrell MM (2003) J Exp Bot 54(382):451. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg04910.1093/jxb/erg049 ↗
2. Evangelista RL, Nikolov ZL, Wei S, Jane JL, Gelina RJ (1991) Ind Eng Chem Res 30(8):1841. doi: 10.1021/ie00056a02510.1021/ie00056a025 ↗
3. Willett JL (1994) J Appl Polym Sci 54(11):1685. doi: 10.1002/app.1994.07054111210.1002/app.1994.070541112 ↗
4. Otey FH, Westhoff RP, Doane WM (1980) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 19(4):4
5. Chandra R, Rustgi R (1997) Polym Degrad Stab 56(2):185. doi: 10.1016/s0141-3910(96)00212-110.1016/S0141-3910(96)00212-1 ↗
6. Averous L (2004) J Macromol Sci Polym Rev C44(3):231. doi: 10.1081/mc-20002932610.1081/MC-200029326 ↗
7. St. Pierre N, Favis BD, Ramsay BA, Ramsay JA, Verhoogt H (1997) Polymer 38(3):647. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(97)81176-710.1016/S0032-3861(97)81176-7 ↗
8. Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ, Ramsay BA, Favis BD (2004) Carbohydr Polym 58(2):139. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.002 ↗
9. Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ, Ramsay BA, Favis BD (2003) Polymer 44(5):1517. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00907-210.1016/S0032-3861(02)00907-2 ↗
10. Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ (2002) Low density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch blends. NQ73435. Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal
11. Bikiaris D, Panayiotou C (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70(8):1503. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19981121)70:8<1503:aid-app9>3.0.co;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981121)70:8<1503::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
12. Girija BG, Sailaja RRN (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 101(2):1109. doi: 10.1002/app.2402510.1002/app.24025 ↗
13. Sailaja RRN (2005) Polym Int 54(2):286. doi: 10.1002/pi.166910.1002/pi.1669 ↗
14. Sailaja RRN, Chanda M (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 80(6):863. doi: 10.1002/1097-4628(20010509)80:6<863:aid-app1164>3.0.co;2-r10.1002/1097-4628(20010509)80:6<863::AID-APP1164>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
15. Sailaja RRN, Chanda M (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 86(12):3126. doi: 10.1002/app.1134010.1002/app.11340 ↗
16. Wang SJ, Yu JG, Yu JL (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93(2):686. doi: 10.1002/app.2041610.1002/app.20416 ↗
17. Shujun W, Jiugao Y, Jinglin Y (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 87(3):395. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.012 ↗
18. Sailaja RRN, Reddy AP, Chanda M (2001) Polym Int 50(12):1352. doi: 10.1002/pi.78710.1002/pi.787 ↗
19. Wang SJ, Yu JG, Yu JL (2005) Polym Int 54(2):279. doi: 10.1002/pi.166810.1002/pi.1668 ↗
20. Huneault MA, Li H (2007) Polymer 48(1):270. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.02310.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.023 ↗
21. Zhang JF, Sun XZ (2004) Biomacromolecules 5(4):1446. doi: 10.1021/bm040002210.1021/bm0400022 ↗
22. Sailaja RRN, Chanda M (2000) J Polym Mater 17(2):165
23. Taguet A, Huneault MA, Favis BD (2009) Polymer 50(24):5733. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.05510.1016/j.polymer.2009.09.055 ↗
24. Averous L, Moro L, Dole P, Fringant C (2000) Polymer 41(11):4157. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00636-910.1016/S0032-3861(99)00636-9 ↗
25. Lourdin D, Bizot H, Colonna P (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 63(8):1047. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19970222)63:8<1047:aid-app11>3.0.co;2-310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970222)63:8<1047::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
26. Adeodato Vieira MG, da Silva MA, dos Santos LO, Beppu MM (2011) Eur Polymer J 47(3):254. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011 ↗
27. Nashed G, Rutgers PPG, Sopade PA (2003) Starch Starke 55(3–4):131. doi: 10.1002/star.20039002710.1002/star.200390027 ↗
28. Poutanen K, Forssell P (1996) Trends Polym Sci 4(4):128
29. Wang L, Shogren RL, Carriere C (2000) Polym Eng Sci 40(2):499. doi: 10.1002/pen.1118210.1002/pen.11182 ↗
30. Talja RA, Helen H, Roos YH, Jouppila K (2007) Carbohydr Polym 67(3):288. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.019 ↗
31. Kalichevsky MT, Jaroszkiewicz EM, Blanshard JMV (1993) Polymer 34(2):346. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90088-r10.1016/0032-3861(93)90088-R ↗
32. Mathew AP, Dufresne A (2002) Biomacromolecules 3(5):1101. doi: 10.1021/bm020065p10.1021/bm020065p ↗
33. Kaseem M, Hamad K, Deri F (2012) Polym Sci Ser A 54(2):165. doi: 10.1134/s0965545x1202006x10.1134/S0965545X1202006X ↗
34. Gaudin S, Lourdin D, Le Botlan D, Ilari JL, Colonna P (1999) J Cereal Sci 29(3):273. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1999.023610.1006/jcrs.1999.0236 ↗
35. Li H, Huneault MA (2011) J Appl Polym Sci 119(4):2439. doi: 10.1002/app.3295610.1002/app.32956 ↗
36. Taghizadeh A, Favis BD (2012) Submitted for publication
37. Macosko CW (2000) Macromol Symp 149:171. doi: 10.1002/1521-3900(200001)149:1<171:aid-masy171>3.0.co;2-810.1002/1521-3900(200001)149:1<171::AID-MASY171>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
38. Aravind I, Albert P, Ranganathaiah C, Kurian JV, Thomas S (2004) Polymer 45(14):4925. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.06310.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.063 ↗
39. Kim JK, Lee H (1996) Polymer 37(2):305. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)81103-710.1016/0032-3861(96)81103-7 ↗
40. Macosko CW, Jeon HK, Hoye TR (2005) Prog Polym Sci 30(8–9):939. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2005.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2005.06.003 ↗
41. Bhadane PA, Tsou AH, Cheng J, Favis BD (2008) Macromolecules 41(20):7549. doi: 10.1021/ma801390s10.1021/ma801390s ↗
42. Pan L, Chiba T, Inoue T (2001) Polymer 42(21):8825. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00441-410.1016/S0032-3861(01)00441-4 ↗
43. Pan L, Inoue T, Hayami H, Nishikawa S (2002) Polymer 43(2):337. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00616-410.1016/S0032-3861(01)00616-4 ↗
44. Favis BD, Rodriguez F, Ramsay BA (2003) United States Patent 6,605,657
45. Favis BD, Rodriguez F, Ramsay BA (2005) United States Patent 6,844,380
46. Favis BD, Chalifoux JP (1987) Polym Eng Sci 27(21):1591. doi: 10.1002/pen.76027210510.1002/pen.760272105 ↗
47. Saltikov SA (1967) In: Elias H (ed) Proceedings of second international congress for stereology. Springer, Berlin, p 163
48. Favis BD (1994) Polymer 35(7):1552. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90358-110.1016/0032-3861(94)90358-1 ↗
49. Cigana P, Favis BD (1998) Polymer 39(15):3373. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(97)10041-610.1016/S0032-3861(97)10041-6 ↗
50. Cigana P, Favis BD, Jerome R (1996) J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 34(9):1691. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19960715)34:9<1691:aid-polb18>3.0.co;2-210.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19960715)34:9<1691::AID-POLB18>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
51. Lomellini P, Matos M, Favis BD (1996) Polymer 37(25):5689. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(96)00432-610.1016/S0032-3861(96)00432-6 ↗
52. Angellier H, Molina-Boisseau S, Dole P, Dufresne A (2006) Biomacromolecules 7(2):531. doi: 10.1021/bm050797s10.1021/bm050797s ↗
53. Averous L, Fauconnier N, Moro L, Fringant C (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 76(7):1117. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(20000516)76:7<1117:aid-app16>3.0.co;2-w10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000516)76:7<1117::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
54. Martin O, Averous L (2001) Polymer 42(14):6209. doi: 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00086-610.1016/S0032-3861(01)00086-6 ↗
55. Bizot H, LeBail P, Leroux B, Davy J, Roger P, Buleon A (1997) Carbohydr Polym 32(1):33. doi: 10.1016/s0144-8617(96)00146-410.1016/S0144-8617(96)00146-4 ↗
56. Sarazin P, Li G, Orts WJ, Favis BD (2008) Polymer 49(2):599. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.02910.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.029 ↗
57. Chivrac F, Angellier-Coussy H, Guillard V, Pollet E, Averous L (2010) Carbohydr Polym 82(1):128. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.036 ↗
58. Krogars K, Heinämäki J, Karjalainen M, Niskanen A, Leskelä M, Yliruusi J (2003) Int J Pharm 251(1–2):205. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00585-910.1016/S0378-5173(02)00585-9 ↗
59. Reichardt C, Welton T (2011) Solvents and solvent effects in organic chemistry, 4th edn. Wiley, Weinheim
60. Ionescu M (2005) Chemistry and technology of polyols for polyurethanes. Smithers Rapra Technology, Shropshire
61. Ravati S, Favis BD (2010) Polymer 51(16):3669. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.01510.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.015 ↗
62. Virgilio N, Desjardins P, L’Esperance G, Favis BD (2010) Polymer 51(6):1472. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.01710.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.017 ↗
63. Sivaniah E, Jones RAL, Higgins D (2009) Macromolecules 42(22):8844. doi: 10.1021/ma901739410.1021/ma9017394 ↗
64. Broseta D, Fredrickson GH, Helfand E, Leibler L (1990) Macromolecules 23(1):132. doi: 10.1021/ma00203a02310.1021/ma00203a023 ↗
65. Yoo S-H, Jane J-l (2002) Carbohydr Polym 49(3):307. doi: 10.1016/s0144-8617(01)00339-310.1016/S0144-8617(01)00339-3 ↗
66. Bindzus W, Livings SJ, Gloria-Hernandez H, Fayard G, van Lengerich B, Meuser F (2002) Starch Starke 54(9):393. doi: 10.1002/1521-379x(200209)54:9<393:aid-star393>3.0.co;2-w10.1002/1521-379X(200209)54:9<393::AID-STAR393>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
67. Liu W-C, Halley PJ, Gilbert RG (2010) Macromolecules 43(6):2855. doi: 10.1021/ma100067x10.1021/ma100067x ↗
68. Bao JS, Ao ZH, Jane JI (2005) Starch Starke 57(10):480. doi: 10.1002/star.20050042210.1002/star.200500422 ↗
69. Lu QW, Macosko CW, Horrion J (2003) Macromol Symp 198:221. doi: 10.1002/masy.20035081910.1002/masy.200350819 ↗
70. Jeon HK, Kim JK (1998) Macromolecules 31(26):9273. doi: 10.1021/ma971002f10.1021/ma971002f ↗
71. Hameed T, Quinlan PJ, Potter DK, Takacs E (2012) Macromol Mater Eng 297(1):39. doi: 10.1002/mame.20110011710.1002/mame.201100117 ↗
72. Bhadane PA, Tsou AH, Cheng J, Ellul M, Favis BD (2011) Polymer 52(22):5107. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.04910.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.049 ↗
73. Kim HY, Jeong U, Kim JK (2003) Macromolecules 36(5):1594. doi: 10.1021/ma025790710.1021/ma0257907 ↗