Study on the reduction of highly porous TiO2 precursors and thin TiO2 layers by the FFC-Cambridge process
Source abstract
Abstract
Reduction of porous titanium oxide precursors by the FFC-Cambridge process is reported in this paper. Porous TiO2 precursors were prepared by mixing the powder with different concentrations of graphite and polyethylene as fugitive agents and sintered at 1,073 K. The maximum porosity achieved before the mixture saturation was approximately 75%. After the electro-deoxidation by the FFC-Cambridge process, shrinkage of approximately 40% in volume and increase in porosity were observed, which might be due to atomic rearrangement, change of density and subsequent grain growth during reduction. The potential applied (below the decomposition potential of CaCl2) had a direct effect on the minimum level of oxygen achieved, which was approximately 3,000 ppm for 48 h at 3.00 V and the same level at half the time (24 h) when increasing potential to 3.15 V. On the other hand, thin layers (300 μm thickness) screen-printed on titanium foils showed shorter reduction time than that observed for thicker porous pellets. This led to the conclusion that cathode geometry (porosity and thickness of the pellet) might have an effect on the rate of reduction by increasing the surface area available and improving the mass diffusion of oxygen ions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Ik-Hyun O, Naoyuki N, Shuji H (2002) Mater Trans 43:44310.2320/matertrans.43.526 ↗
2. Thelen S, Barthelat F, Brinson LC (2004) J Biomed Mater Res A 69A:60110.1002/jbm.a.20100 ↗
3. Li HL, Oppenheimer SM, Stupp SI, Dunand DC, Brinson LC (2004) Mater Trans 45:112410.2320/matertrans.45.1124 ↗
4. Larminie J, Dicks A (2000) Fuel cells systems explained. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, p 5
5. Lipp L, Pletcher D (1997) Electrochim Acta 42:109110.1016/S0013-4686(96)00257-5 ↗
6. Lindbergh G, Olivry M, Sparr M (2001) J Electrochem Soc 149:A41110.1149/1.1359195 ↗
7. Froes FH (1998) JOM 50:1510.1007/s11837-998-0407-2 ↗
8. Hartman AD, Gerdemann SJ, Hansen JS (1998) JOM 50:1610.1007/s11837-998-0408-1 ↗
9. Chen GZ, Fray DJ, Farthing TW (2000) Nature 407:36110.1038/35030069 ↗
10. Yan XY, Fray DJ (2002) Metall Mater Trans B 33B:68510.1007/s11663-002-0021-6 ↗
11. Yan XY, Fray DJ (2003) J Mater Res 18:34610.1557/JMR.2003.0045 ↗
12. Delimarskii IK (1975) Electrochemistry of fused salts. Sigma Press Publishers, Washington, DC
13. Ono K, Suzuki RO (2002) JOM 54:5910.1007/BF02701078 ↗
14. Fray DJ (2002) Can Metall Q 41:43310.1179/cmq.2002.41.4.433 ↗
15. Chen GZ, Fray DJ (2002) J Electrochem Soc 149:E45510.1149/1.1513985 ↗
16. Dring K, Dashwood R, Inman D (2005) J Electrochem Soc 152:E10410.1149/1.1860515 ↗
17. Jiang K et al (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:42810.1002/anie.200502318 ↗
18. Schwandt C, Fray DJ (2005) Electrochim Acta 51:6610.1016/j.electacta.2005.03.048 ↗
19. Suzuki RO, Teranuma K, Ono K (2003) Metall Mater Trans B 34B:28710.1007/s11663-003-0074-1 ↗
20. Meng QB, Go ZZ, Sato O (2000) Appl Phys Lett 77:431310.1063/1.1332109 ↗
21. Brian BT, Blanford CF, Stein A (1998) Science 281:53810.1126/science.281.5376.538 ↗
22. Donachie MJ Jr (1988) Titanium: a technical guide. ASM International, USA, p 6