journal article·2013-10

Cellular automata modeling of static recrystallization based on the curvature driven subgrain growth mechanism

Fengbo Han, Bin Tang, Hongchao Kou, Jinshan Li, Yong Feng

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

A two-dimensional cellular automata model was developed to describe the static recrystallization (SRX) arising from the subgrain growth, the driving force of which is dependent on boundary energy and local curvature. At the same time, the subgrain boundary energy and mobility rely on the boundary misorientation angle. On the basis, a deterministic switch rule was adopted to simulate the subgrain growth and kinetics of recrystallization quantitatively to provide an insight into the grain boundary bulging nucleation mechanism. Microstructure evolutions during SRX in different cases were simulated by the developed model. At the beginning of the simulation, the initial polycrystalline microstructure which contains large number of uniformly distributed subgrains in every pre-existing grain was prepared using simple assumption based on experimental observations. Then, both homogeneous and inhomogeneous subgrain growth phenomena were captured by the simulation with different inter-subgrain misorientation, which showed continuous and discontinuous recrystallization, respectively. The effects of initial mean subgrain radius, distribution of initial subgrains, distribution of inter-subgrain misorientations, and annealing temperature on the recrystallization kinetics were also investigated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Pergamon Press, Oxford
2. Holm EA, Miodownik MA, Rollett AD (2003) Acta Mater 51:270110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00079-X ↗
3. Radhakrishnan B, Zacharia T (2003) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 11:30710.1088/0965-0393/11/3/304 ↗
4. Radhakrishnan B, Sarma G, Zacharia T (1998) Acta Mater 46:441510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00077-9 ↗
5. Weygand D, Brechett Y, Lepinoux J (2000) Philos Mag B 80:198710.1080/13642810008216521 ↗
6. Weygand D, Brechet Y, Lepinoux J (2001) Interface Sci 9:31110.1023/A:1015175231826 ↗
7. Suwa Y, Saito Y, Onodera H (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 457:13210.1016/j.msea.2007.01.091 ↗
8. Suwa Y, Saito Y, Onodera H (2008) Comput Mater Sci 44:28610.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.025 ↗
9. Takaki T, Tomita Y (2010) Int J Mech Sci 52:320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.03710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.037 ↗
10. Humphreys F (1997) Acta Mater 45:423110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00070-0 ↗
11. Rollett A, Mullins W (1997) Scr Mater 36:97510.1016/S1359-6462(96)00501-5 ↗
12. Raabe D (2002) Annu Rev Mater Res 32:5310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.090601.152855 ↗
13. Raabe D (1998) Computational materials science. Wiley-VCH, Weiheim10.1002/3527601945 ↗
14. Janssens KGF (2010) Math Comput Simul 80:1361. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.02.01110.1016/j.matcom.2009.02.011 ↗
15. Yang H, Wu C, Li H, Fan X (2011) Sci China Technol Sci 54:210710.1007/s11431-011-4464-3 ↗
16. Hesselbarth HW, Göbel IR (1991) Acta Metall Mater 39:2135. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90183-210.1016/0956-7151(91)90183-2 ↗
17. Davies C (1995) Scr Metall Mater 33:113910.1016/0956-716X(95)00335-S ↗
18. Davies C (1997) Scr Mater 36:3510.1016/S1359-6462(96)00331-4 ↗
19. Goetz R, Seetharaman V (1998) Metall Mater Trans A 29:230710.1007/s11661-998-0108-z ↗
20. Marx V, Reher FR, Gottstein G (1999) Acta Mater 47:1219. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00421-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00421-2 ↗
21. Davies C, Hong L (1999) Scr Mater 40:1145–115010.1016/S1359-6462(99)00021-4 ↗
22. Zheng C, Xiao N, Li D, Li Y (2008) Comput Mater Sci 44:507. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.010 ↗
23. Zheng C, Xiao N, Li D, Li Y (2009) Comput Mater Sci 45:568. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.11.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2008.11.021 ↗
24. Yu X, Chen S, Wang L (2009) Comput Mater Sci 46:66. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.00810.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.008 ↗
25. Seyed Salehi M, Serajzadeh S (2012) Comput Mater Sci 53:14510.1016/j.commatsci.2011.09.026 ↗
26. Kazeminezhad M (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 486:20210.1016/j.msea.2007.08.071 ↗
27. Raabe D, Becker RC (2000) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 8:44510.1088/0965-0393/8/4/304 ↗
28. Kugler G, Turk R (2006) Comput Mater Sci 37:284. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.005 ↗
29. Zambaldi C, Roters F, Raabe D, Glatzel U (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 454–455:433. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.06810.1016/j.msea.2006.11.068 ↗
30. Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Hantcherli L, Tjahjanto DD, Bieler TR, Raabe D (2010) Acta Mater 58:1152. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.05810.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 ↗
31. Gleiter H (1969) Philos Mag 20:82110.1080/14786436908228047 ↗
32. Doherty R, Hughes D, Humphreys F et al (1997) Mater Sci Eng A 238:21910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00424-3 ↗
33. Demirel M, Kuprat A, George D, Rollett A (2003) Phys Rev Lett 90:1610610.1103/PhysRevLett.90.016106 ↗
34. Lan Y, Li D, Li Y (2006) Metall Mater Trans B 37:11910.1007/s11663-006-0091-y ↗
35. Ding R, Guo ZX (2001) Acta Mater 49:3163. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00233-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00233-6 ↗
36. Read W, Shockley W (1950) Phys Rev 78:27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
37. Kremeyer K (1998) J Comput Phys 142:24310.1006/jcph.1998.5926 ↗
38. Jazaeri H, Humphreys FJ (2004) Acta Mater 52:3239. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.03010.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.030 ↗
39. Zheng C, Raabe D, Li D (2012) Acta Mater 60:476810.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.007 ↗
40. Zurob H, Brechet Y, Dunlop J (2006) Acta Mater 54:398310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.028 ↗