Experimental and numerical analysis of hot tearing susceptibility for Mg–Y alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The influences of Y content and initial mold temperatures on the hot tearing susceptibility (HTS) of binary Mg–Y alloys were investigated using a constrained rod casting (CRC) apparatus, which is equipped with a load cell and data acquisition systems. The hot crack formation was monitored during CRC experiments. The experimental results show that HTS first increases with increase in the Y content, reaches the maximum at about 1.5 wt% Y and then decreases with further increase in the content of Y. The severest of hot tearing is found in Mg–1.5 wt% Y alloy which is due to its large columnar grain structure, wide solidification range, and small amount of eutectic. The resistance to hot tearing is apparently improved by increasing the initial mold temperature. ProCAST simulation software was used to predict the hot tearing of Mg–Y alloys in CRC. The simulation results show a good agreement with the experimental measurements. The numerical simulations will be helpful and valuable to optimize the alloy composition and casting parameters to minimize the hot tearing defects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Warrington D, McCartney DG (1989) Cast Met 2:13410.1080/09534962.1989.11818994 ↗
2. Wang Y, Sun B, Wang Q, Zhu Y, Ding W (2002) Mater Lett 53:3510.1016/S0167-577X(01)00449-9 ↗
3. Suzuki A, Saddock ND, Jones JW, Pollock TM (2005) Acta Mater 53:282310.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.001 ↗
4. Cao G, Kou S (2006) Metall Mater Trans A 37:364710.1007/s11661-006-1059-x ↗
5. Zhen ZS, Hort N, Utke O, Huang YD, Petri N, Kainer KU (2009) In: Nyberg EA (ed) Magnesium technology 2009. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, San Francisco, p 105
6. Martin G, Yerra SK, Bréchet Y, Véron M, Mithieux JD, Chéhab B, Delannay L, Pardoen T (2012) Acta Mater 60:464610.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.040 ↗
7. Nabawy AM, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Doty HW (2012) J Mater Sci 47:414610.1007/s10853-012-6269-6 ↗
8. Eskin DG, Suyitno, Katgerman L (2004) Prog Mater Sci 49:62910.1016/S0079-6425(03)00037-9 ↗
9. Cao G, Kou S (2006) Mat Sci Eng A 417:23010.1016/j.msea.2005.10.050 ↗
10. Li SS, Tang B, Jin XY, Zeng DB (2012) J Mater Sci 47:200010.1007/s10853-011-5997-3 ↗
11. Zhou L, Huang YD, Mao PL, Kainer KU, Liu Z, Hort N (2011) In: Sillekens WH (ed) Magnesium technology 2011. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, San Diego, p 12510.1002/9781118062029.ch24 ↗
12. Guo J, Zhu JZ (2007) Proceedings of the 5th decennial international conference on solidification processing, Sheffield, p 549
13. Marin EB, McDowell DL (1997) Comput Struct 63:57910.1016/S0045-7949(97)89625-3 ↗
14. Sandlöbes S, Friák M, Zaefferer S, Dick A, Yi S, Letzig D, Pei Z, Zhu LF, Neugebauer J, Raabe D (2012) Acta Mater 60:301110.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.006 ↗
15. Wu BL, Zhao YH, Du XH, Zhang YD, Wagner F, Esling C (2010) Mat Sci Eng A 527:433410.1016/j.msea.2010.03.054 ↗
16. Peng QM, Meng J, Li Y, Huang YD, Hort N (2011) Mat Sci Eng A 528:210610.1016/j.msea.2010.11.042 ↗
17. Wang Z, Huang YD, Srinivasan A, Liu Z, Beckmann F, Kainer KU, Hort N (2013) Mater Design 47:9010.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.044 ↗
18. Watson IG, Lee PD, Dashwood RJ, Young PG (2006) Metall Mater Trans A 37:55110.1007/s11661-006-0027-9 ↗
19. Alkemper J, Voorhees PW (2001) Acta Mater 49:89710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00355-4 ↗
20. Zhou L, Huang YD, Mao PL, Kainer KU, Liu Z, Hort N (2011) Int J Cast Metal Res 24:17010.1179/136404611X13001912813942 ↗
21. Huang YD, Wang Z, Srinivasan A, Kainer KU, Hort N (2012) Acta Phys Pol A 122:49710.12693/APhysPolA.122.497 ↗
22. Campbell J (2003) Castings. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
23. Srinivasan A, Wang Z, Huang YD, Beckmann F, Kainer KU, Hort N (2013) Metall Mater Trans A 44:228510.1007/s11661-012-1593-7 ↗
24. Gurson AL (1997) J Eng Mater-T ASME 99:210.1115/1.3443401 ↗
25. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Acta Metal 32:15710.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
26. Needleman A, Tvergaard V (1987) J Mech Phys Solids 35:15110.1016/0022-5096(87)90034-2 ↗
27. Zhang ZL, Thaulow C, Odegard J (2000) Eng Fract Mech 67:15510.1016/S0013-7944(00)00055-2 ↗
28. Clyne TW, Davies GJ (1981) Brit Foundryman 74:65
29. Easton M, Grandfield J, StJohn D, Rinderer B (2006) Mater Sci Forum 30:167510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1675 ↗
30. Dahle AK, Arnberg L (1996) JOM 48:3410.1007/BF03222888 ↗
31. Pellini WS (1952) Foundry 80:125
32. Pellini WS, Bishop HF, Ackerlind CG (1952) Trans Am Foundrym Soc 60:818
33. Paliwal M, Kang YB, Essadiqi E, Jung IH (2012) In: Mathaudhu SN, Sillekens WH, Neelameggham NR, Hort N (eds) Magnesium technology 2012, Orlando. TMS, Warrendale, p 175