Shear-thickening behaviour of concentrated polymer dispersions under steady and oscillatory shear
Source abstract
Abstract
The rheological behaviour of a 58 vol.% dispersion of styrene/acrylate particles in ethylene glycol was investigated using a plate-on-plate rheometer. Experimental results showed that the concentrated polymer dispersion exhibited a strong shear-thickening transition under both steady shear and dynamic oscillatory conditions. The low-frequency dynamic oscillatory behaviour could be reasonably interpreted in terms of the steady shear behaviour. Accordingly, the critical dynamic shear rate \( \dot{\gamma }_{{{\text{c\_d}}}} , \) agreed well with the critical shear rate obtained in steady flow \( \dot{\gamma }_{{{\text{c\_s}}}} , \) where \( \dot{\gamma }_{{{\text{c\_d}}}} \) was calculated as the maximum shear rate by the critical dynamic shear strain γc and the frequency ω, i.e. \( \dot{\gamma }_{{{\text{c\_d}}}} = \omega \gamma_{\text{c}} . \) However, during high-frequency dynamic oscillation, it was observed that the shear thickening occurred only when an apparent critical shear strain was reached, which could not be fully explained by the wall-slipping effect. Based on freeze fracture microscopic observations, the effect of the micro-sized flocculation of particles on the rheology of concentrated dispersions was also discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Material Dynamics and Properties · Granular flow and fluidized beds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Hoffman RL (1972) Trans Soc Rheol 16:15510.1122/1.549250 ↗
2. Hoffman RL (1974) J Colloid Interface Sci 46:49110.1016/0021-9797(74)90059-9 ↗
3. Barnes HA (1997) J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 70:110.1016/S0377-0257(97)00004-9 ↗
4. Raghavan SR, Khan SA (1997) J Colloid Interface Sci 185:5710.1006/jcis.1996.4581 ↗
5. Lee YS, Wagner NJ (2003) Rheol Acta 142:19910.1007/s00397-002-0290-7 ↗
6. Fall A, Huang N, Bertrand F, Ovarlez G, Bonn D (2008) Phys Rev Lett 100:01830110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.018301 ↗
7. Helber R, Doncker F, Bung R (1990) J Sound Vib 138:4710.1016/0022-460X(90)90703-3 ↗
8. Lee YS, Wetzel ED, Wagner NJ (2003) J Mater Sci 38:2825. doi: 10.1023/A:102442420022110.1023/A:1024424200221 ↗
9. Fischer C, Braun SA, Bourban PE, Michaud C, Plummer C, Manson J (2006) Smart Mater Struct 15:146710.1088/0964-1726/15/5/036 ↗
10. Vermant J, Solomon MJ (2005) J Phys Condens Matter 17:18710.1088/0953-8984/17/4/R02 ↗
11. Doraiswamy D, Mujumdar AN, Tsao I, Beris AN, Danforth SC, Metzner AB (1991) J Rheol 35:64710.1122/1.550184 ↗
12. Laun HM, Bung R, Schmidt F (1991) J Rheol 35:99910.1122/1.550257 ↗
13. Bender JW, Wagner NJ (1995) J Colloid Interface Sci 172:17110.1006/jcis.1995.1240 ↗
14. Bossis G, Brady JF (1989) J Chem Phys 91:186610.1063/1.457091 ↗
15. Boersma WH, Laven J, Stein HN (1992) J Colloid Interface Sci 149:1010.1016/0021-9797(92)90385-Y ↗
16. Farr RS, Melrose JR, Ball RC (1997) Phys Rev E 55:720310.1103/PhysRevE.55.7203 ↗
17. O’brien VT, Mackay ME (2000) Langmuir 16:793110.1021/la000050h ↗
18. Holmes CB, Fuchs M, Cates ME (2003) Europhys Lett 63:24010.1209/epl/i2003-00465-1 ↗
19. Brown E, Jaeger HM (2009) Phys Rev Lett 103:08600110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.086001 ↗
20. Singh A, Nott PR (2003) J Fluid Mech 490:29310.1017/S0022112003005366 ↗
21. Singh A, Nott PR (2000) J Fluid Mech 412:27910.1017/S0022112000008375 ↗
22. Laun HM (1994) J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 54:8710.1016/0377-0257(94)80016-2 ↗
23. Jomha AI, Reynolds PA (1993) Rheol Acta 32:45710.1007/BF00396176 ↗
24. Negi AS, Osuji CO (2009) Rheol Acta 48:87110.1007/s00397-008-0341-9 ↗
25. Kanai H, Amari T (1995) Rheol Acta 34:30310.1007/BF00396021 ↗