journal article·2007-08

Creep behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy in low temperature range between 423 K and 473 K

Ho-Kyung Kim, Woo-Jin Kim

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The deformation behavior of coarse-grained AZ31 magnesium alloy was examined in creep at low temperatures below 0.5 T m and low strain rates below 5 × 10−4 s−1. The creep test was conducted in the temperature range between 423 and 473 K (0.46–0.51 T m) under various constant stresses covering the strain rate range 5 × 10−8 s−1–5 × 10−4 s−1. All of the creep curves exhibited two types depending on stress level. At low stress (σ/G 4 × 103), the creep curve was typical of class II. At the low stress level, deformation could be well described by solute drag creep whereas at the high stress level, deformation could be well described by dislocation climb creep associated with pipe diffusion or lattice diffusion. The transition of deformation mechanism from solute drag creep to dislocation climb creep, on the other hand, could be explained in terms of solute-atmosphere-breakaway concept.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Friedrich H, Schumann S (2001) J Mater Process Technol 117:27610.1016/S0924-0136(01)00780-4 ↗
2. Luo AA (2004) Int Mater Rev 49:1310.1179/095066004225010497 ↗
3. Vagarali SS, Langdon TG (1981) Acta Metall 29:196910.1016/0001-6160(81)90034-1 ↗
4. Vagarali SS, Langdon TG (1982) Acta Metall 30:115710.1016/0001-6160(82)90009-8 ↗
5. Kim WJ, Chung SW, Chung CS, Kum D (2001) Acta Mater 49:333710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00008-8 ↗
6. Chung SW, Watanabe H, Kim WJ, Higashi K (2004) Mater Trans 45:126610.2320/matertrans.45.1266 ↗
7. Somekawa H, Hirai K, Watanabe H, Tagigawa Y, Higashi K (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 407:5310.1016/j.msea.2005.06.059 ↗
8. Spigarelli S, Cabibbo M, Evangeliast E, Talianker M, Ezersky V (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 289:17210.1016/S0921-5093(00)00911-4 ↗
9. Shi L, Northwood DO (1994) Acta Metall 42:87110.1016/0956-7151(94)90282-8 ↗
10. Evangerlista E, Spigarelli S, Cabibbo M, Scalabroni C, Lohne O, Ulseth P (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 410:6210.1016/j.msea.2005.08.150 ↗
11. Kim HK, Mohamed FA, Earthman JC (1991) J Test Eval 19:9310.1520/JTE12540J ↗
12. Isshiki K et al (1997) Metal Mater Trans 28A:257710.1007/s11661-997-0015-8 ↗
13. Cannon WR, Sherby OD (1970) Metall Trans 1:103010.1007/BF02811789 ↗
14. Robinson SL, Sherby OD (1969) Acta Metall 17:10910.1016/0001-6160(69)90132-1 ↗
15. Frost HJ, Ashby MF (1982) In: Deformation—Mechanisms Maps. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 121
16. Moreau G, Cornet JA, Calais D (1977) J Nucl Mater 38:19710.1016/0022-3115(71)90043-2 ↗
17. Shewmon PG, Rhines FN (1954) Trans Am Inst Min Engrs 200:1021
18. Weertman J (1957) J Appl Phys 28:118510.1063/1.1722604 ↗
19. Takeuchi S, Argon AS (1976) Acta Metall 24:88310.1016/0001-6160(76)90036-5 ↗
20. Friedel J (1964) In: Dislocations. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 5410.1016/B978-0-08-013523-6.50011-9 ↗
21. King HW (1966) J Mater Sci 1:7910.1007/BF00549722 ↗
22. Endo T, Shimada T, Langdon TG (1984) Acta Metall 32:199110.1016/0001-6160(84)90179-2 ↗
23. Kuchařová K, Saxl I, Cadek J (1974) Acta Metall 22:46510.1016/0001-6160(74)90099-6 ↗