Mechanical properties of friction welded 6063 aluminum alloy and austenitic stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Friction welding of dissimilar metal combination of aluminum alloy and austenitic stainless steel was examined to investigate the effect of welding conditions on mechanical properties of the dissimilar metal combination. The welded joints were produced by varying forge pressure (Fg), friction pressure (Fr), and burn-off length (B). The joints were subjected to mechanical testing methods such as the tension, notch Charpy impact tests. The tensile strength and toughness decrease with an increase in friction pressure. The tensile strength decreases with an increase in burn-off length at a low forge pressure while tensile strength increases with an increase in burn-off length at a high forge pressure. The tensile failure of the welded joint occurred in aluminum alloy just away from interface in the thermo-mechanically affected zone indicates good joint strength at the condition of low friction pressure, high forge pressure, and high burn-off length. The maximum tensile strength was observed with low friction pressure and high forge pressure. The tensile strength of dissimilar joint is approximately equal to tensile strength of 6063 aluminum alloys at the condition of low friction pressure, high forge pressure, and high burn-off length. The tensile and impact failure of joints was examined under scanning electron microscope and failure modes were discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Ruge J, Thomas K, Eckel C, Sundaresan S (1986) Weld J 65:28
2. Kim HJ, Kang JY, Shin YE, Kim DS (1998) Welding handbook. Korea Welding Society, Seoul, p 659
3. Yılmaz M (1993) Investigation of welding area in the friction welding of tool steels. PhD thesis, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey
4. Fukumoto S, Tsubakino H, Okita K, Aritashi M, Tomita T (1998) Mater Sci Technol 14:33310.1179/mst.1998.14.4.333 ↗
5. Fukumoto S, Tsubakino H, Okita K, Aritashi M, Tomita T (1999) Mater Sci Technol 15:108010.1179/026708399101506805 ↗
6. Dunn KA, Tosten MH, Louthan MR, Birt ML (1999) In: 32nd international metallographic society annual convention, OH, USA, 31 Oct–3 Nov, 1999
7. Fukumoto S, Ohashi M, Tsubakino H, Okita K, Aritoshi M, Tomita T, Goto K (1998) J Jpn Inst Light Met 48(1):3610.2464/jilm.48.36 ↗
8. Ochi H, Ogawa K, Yamamoto Y, Suga Y (1996) J Soc Mater Sci 45(4):45910.2472/jsms.45.459 ↗
9. Sundaresan S, Murti KGK (1993) Join Mater 5(2):66
10. Yokoyama T, Yamaguchi M (1999) J Jpn Inst Light Met 49(9/11):53510.2464/jilm.49.535 ↗
11. Olorunniwo OE, Atanda PO, Akinluwade KJ (2009) J Miner Mater Charact Eng 8(1):1
12. Satyanarayana VV, Madhusudhan Reddy G, Mohandas T (2005) J Mater Process Technol 160:12810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.017 ↗
13. Yılmaz M, Col M, Acet M (2003) Mater Charact 49:42110.1016/S1044-5803(03)00051-2 ↗
14. Kim S-Y, Jung S-B, Shur C-C (2003) J Mater Sci 38:1281. doi: 10.1023/A:102289061126410.1023/A:1022890611264 ↗
15. Bekir SY, Ahmet ZS, Nafiz K, Ahmed Z (1995) J Mater Process Technol 49:43110.1016/0924-0136(94)01349-6 ↗
16. Jessop TJ (1995) Friction welding of dissimilar metal combinations-aluminum and stainless steel. Weld Institute Research Report, November 1995, pp 73–75
17. Fukumoto S, Tsubakino H, Aritoshi M, Tomita T, Okita K (2002) Mater Sci Technol 18:21910.1179/026708301225000635 ↗
18. Deschamps A, Brechet Y, Guoyat P (1999) In: Proceedings of the seventh seminar of the international federation of heat treatment and surface engineering, Hungary, pp 1–10