A review of the application of carbon-based membranes to hydrogen separation
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen (H2) is a green clean fuel and chemical feedstock. Its separation and purification from H2-containing mixtures is the key step in the production of H2 with high purity (> 99.99%). Carbon membranes emerged in the 70 s and have provided promising results for applications in processes involving gas separation due to their sieving effects. Particularly, in this review, a general concept route of precursor selection-preparation-modification-performance analysis platform for the carbon membrane has been proposed to promote the development of carbon membrane material for a wide range of application. Several main parts are highlighted which are carbon membrane preparation, precursor selection, precursor pre-treatment covering pyrolysis process, carbonized membrane, pos-treatment and as well as module fabrication in order to improve the separation capability of gas mixtures in respect to permeability and selectivity. The variables of pre-treatment, the parameters of the pyrolysis process and the conditions of the post-treatment are manipulated and implied as a chance to maximize the performance of carbon membrane separation in the coming future. This review will specify an insight into the latest researches, which is expected to offer worthy implications to academicians and industry professionals working in industrial domain for the hydrogen separation. For future perspective, carbon membranes hold significant potential and great promise for further investigation, development and application.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Graphene research and applications · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Bernardo G, Araújo T, da Silva LT, Sousa J, Mendes A (2019) Recent advances in membrane technologies for hydrogen purification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:7313–733810.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.162 ↗
2. Sołowski G, Shalaby MS, Abdallah H, Shaban AM, Cenian A (2018) Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology. Renew Sust Energy Rev 82:3152–316710.1016/j.rser.2017.10.027 ↗
3. Castel C, Wang L, Corriou JP, Favre E (2018) Steady vs unsteady membrane gas separation processes. Chem Eng Sci 183:136–14710.1016/j.ces.2018.03.013 ↗
4. Merkel TC, Turk BS, Gupta RP, Cicero DC, Jain SC (2002) A hybrid gas cleaning process for production of ultraclean syngas. United States. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/837307-hybrid-gas-cleaning-process-production-ultraclean-syngas. Accessed 28 Apr 2020
5. Hirota Y, Nishiyama N (2016) Pore size control of microporous carbon membranes and application to H2 separation. J Jpn Petrol Inst 59:266–27510.1627/jpi.59.266 ↗
6. Hamm JBS, Ambrosi A, Griebeler JG, Marcilio NR, Tessaro IC, Pollo LD (2017) Recent advances in the development of supported carbon membranes for gas separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:24830–2484510.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.071 ↗
7. Owais C, James A, John C, Dhali R, Swathi R (2018) Selective permeation through one-atom-thick nanoporous carbon membranes: theory reveals excellent design strategies! J Phys Chem B 122:5127–514610.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01117 ↗
8. Koresh J, Soffer A (1980) Molecular sieving range of pore diameters of adsorbents. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 76(1):2507–250910.1039/f19807602507 ↗
9. Zhang K, Way JD (2017) Palladium-copper membranes for hydrogen separation. Sep Purif Technol 186:39–4410.1016/j.seppur.2017.05.039 ↗
10. Ernst B, Haag S, Burgard M (2007) Permselectivity of a nickel/ceramic composite membrane at elevated temperatures: a new prospect in hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci 288:208–21710.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.017 ↗
11. Bounaceur R, Berger E, Pfister M, Ramirez Santos AA, Favre E (2017) Rigorous variable permeability modelling and process simulation for the design of polymeric membrane gas separation units: MEMSIC simulation tool. J Membr Sci 523:77–9110.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.011 ↗
12. Lau CH, Nguyen PT, Hill MR, Thornton AW, Konstas K, Doherty CM (2014) Ending aging in super glassy polymer membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:5322–532610.1002/anie.201402234 ↗
13. Yampolskii Y (2012) Polymeric gas separation membranes. Macromolecules 45:3298–331110.1021/ma300213b ↗
14. Matteucci S, Yampolskii Y, Freeman BD, Pinnau I (2006) Transport of gases and vapors in glassy and rubbery polymers, membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley, MHoboken
15. Cheng L-H, Fu Y-J, Liao K-S, Chen J-T, Hu C-C, Hung W-S (2014) A high-permeance supported carbon molecular sieve membrane fabricated by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition followed by carbonization for CO2 capture. J Membr Sci 460:1–810.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.033 ↗
16. Sazali N, Norharyati W, Ismail A, Wong K, Iwamoto Y (2018) Exploiting pyrolysis protocols on BTDA-TDI/MDI (P84) polyimide/nanocrystalline cellulose carbon membrane for gas separations. J Appl Polym Sci 136:1–9
17. Gharari R, Kazeminejad H, Mataji Kojouri N, Hedayat A (2018) A review on hydrogen generation, explosion, and mitigation during severe accidents in light water nuclear reactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:1939–196510.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.174 ↗
18. Yuzer B, Selcuk H, Chehade G, Demir ME, Dincer I (2020) Evaluation of hydrogen production via electrolysis with ion exchange membranes. Energy 190:1–2510.1016/j.energy.2019.116420 ↗
19. El-Shafie MI, Kambara S, Hayakawa Y (2019) Hydrogen production technologies overview. J Energy Eng-Asce 7:107–154
20. Deheri C, Acharya SK, Thatoi DN, Mohanty AP (2020) A review on performance of biogas and hydrogen on diesel engine in dual fuel mode. Fuel 260:1–1710.1016/j.fuel.2019.116337 ↗
21. Dawood F, Anda M, Shafiullah GM (2020) Hydrogen production for energy: an overview. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:3847–386910.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059 ↗
22. Acar C, Dincer I (2019) Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. J Clean Prod 218:835–84910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.046 ↗
23. Dos Santos KG, Eckert CT, De Rossi E, Bariccatti RA, Frigo EP, Lindino CA (2017) Hydrogen production in the electrolysis of water in Brazil, a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 68:563–57110.1016/j.rser.2016.09.128 ↗
24. Pleßmann G, Erdmann M, Hlusiak M, Breyer C (2014) Global energy storage demand for a 100% renewable electricity supply. Energy Procedia 46:22–3110.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.154 ↗
25. Boudries R, Khellaf A, Aliane A, Ihaddaden L, Khida F (2014) PV system design for powering an industrial unit for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:15188–1519510.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.166 ↗
26. Abdin Z, Zafaranloo A, Rafiee A, Mérida W, Lipiński W, Khalilpour KR (2020) Hydrogen as an energy vector. Renew Sust Energy Rev 120:1–3210.1016/j.rser.2019.109620 ↗
27. Salleh WNW, Ismail AF (2013) Effect of stabilization condition on PEI/PVP-based carbon hollow fiber membranes properties. Sep Sci Technol 48:1030–103910.1080/01496395.2012.727938 ↗
28. Ma L, Lv E, Du L, Han Y, Lu J, Ding J (2017) A flow-through tubular catalytic membrane reactor using zirconium sulfate tetrahydrate-impregnated carbon membranes for acidified oil esterification. J Energy Inst 90:875–88310.1016/j.joei.2016.08.007 ↗
29. Ma C, Yu J, Wang B, Song Z, Xiang J, Hu S (2016) Chemical recycling of brominated flame retarded plastics from e-waste for clean fuels production: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 61:433–45010.1016/j.rser.2016.04.020 ↗
30. Ismail AF, David LIB (2001) A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 193:1–1810.1016/S0376-7388(01)00510-5 ↗
31. Ismail NH, Salleh WNW, Sazali N, Ismail AF (2015) The effect of polymer composition on CO2/CH4 separation of supported carbon membrane. Chem Eng Trans 45:1465–1470
32. Zhang Q, Wang H, Fan X, Lv F, Chen S, Quan X (2016) Fabrication of TiO2 nanofiber membranes by a simple dip-coating technique for water treatment. Surf Coat Technol 298:45–5210.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.054 ↗
33. Sarango L, Paseta L, Navarro M, Zornoza B, Coronas J (2018) Controlled deposition of MOFs by dip-coating in thin film nanocomposite membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration. J Ind Eng Chem 59:8–1610.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.053 ↗
34. Zeynali R, Ghasemzadeh K, Sarand AB, Kheiri F, Basile A (2018) Performance evaluation of graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposite membrane for hydrogen separation: effect of dip coating sol concentration. Sep Sci Technol 200:169–176
35. Rodrigues SC, Whitley R, Mendes A (2014) Preparation and characterization of carbon molecular sieve membranes based on resorcinol–formaldehyde resin. J Membr Sci 459:207–21610.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.013 ↗
36. Ismail NH, Salleh WNW, Sazali N, Ismail AF, Yusof N, Aziz F (2018) Disk supported carbon membrane via spray coating method: effect of carbonization temperature and atmosphere. Sep Sci Technol 195:295–304
37. Sazali N, Salleh WNW, Ismail AF, Nordin NAHM, Ismail NH, Mohamed MA (2018) Incorporation of thermally labile additives in carbon membrane development for superior gas permeation performance. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 49:376–38410.1016/j.jngse.2017.10.026 ↗
38. Shen Y, Lua AC (2012) Structural and transport properties of BTDA-TDI/MDI co-polyimide (P84)–silica nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Chem Eng J 188:199–20910.1016/j.cej.2012.01.043 ↗
39. Li D, Zhu HY, Ratinac KR, Ringer SP, Wang H (2009) Synthesis and characterization of sodalite–polyimide nanocomposite membranes. Micropor Mesopor Mat 126:14–1910.1016/j.micromeso.2009.05.014 ↗
40. Zou D, Xu J, Chen X, Drioli E, Qiu M, Fan Y (2019) A novel thermal spraying technique to fabricate fly ash/alumina composite membranes for oily emulsion and spent tin wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 219:127–13610.1016/j.seppur.2019.02.051 ↗
41. Akhgar A, Toghraie D (2018) An experimental study on the stability and thermal conductivity of water-ethylene glycol/TiO2-MWCNTs hybrid nanofluid: developing a new correlation. Powder Technol 338:806–81810.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.086 ↗
42. Alexopoulos ND, Gegitsidis FD, Kourkoulis SK, Favvas EP (2017) Mechanical behavior of MWCNTs based mixed-matrix polymeric and carbon hollow fiber membranes. Sep Purif Technol 183:21–3110.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.061 ↗
43. Jiao W, Ban Y, Shi Z, Jiang X, Li Y, Yang W (2016) High performance carbon molecular sieving membranes derived from pyrolysis of metal-organic framework ZIF-108 doped polyimide matrices. Chem Commun 52:13779–1378210.1039/C6CC07833H ↗
44. Roy S, Das R, Gagrai MK, Sarkar S (2016) Preparation of carbon molecular sieve membrane derived from phenolic resin over macroporous clay-alumina based support for hydrogen separation. J Porous Mater 23:1653–166210.1007/s10934-016-0226-8 ↗
45. Campo MC, Visser T, Nijmeijer K, Wessling M, Magalhães FD, Mendes AM (2009) Influence of pyrolysis parameters on the performance of CMSM. Int J Chem Eng 2009:6–1010.1155/2009/147879 ↗
46. Haider S, Lindbråthen A, Lie JA, Andersen ICT, Hägg M-B (2018) CO2 separation with carbon membranes in high pressure and elevated temperature applications. Sep Purif Technol 190:177–18910.1016/j.seppur.2017.08.038 ↗
47. Kamath MG, Fu S, Itta AK, Qiu W, Liu G, Swaidan R (2018) 6FDA-DETDA: DABE polyimide-derived carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membranes: Circumventing unusual aging phenomena. J Membr Sci 546:197–20510.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.020 ↗
48. Kim S-J, Lee PS, Chang J-S, Nam S-E, Park Y-I (2018) Preparation of carbon molecular sieve membranes on low-cost alumina hollow fibers for use in C3H6/C3H8 separation. Sep Purif Technol 194:443–45010.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.069 ↗
49. Choi S-H, Sultan MMB, Alsuwailem AA, Zuabi SM (2019) Preparation and characterization of multilayer thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for helium extraction from its mixtures. Sep Purif Technol 222:152–16110.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.036 ↗
50. Zhang J, Xue Q, Pan X, Jin Y, Lu W, Ding D (2017) Graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile fiber hierarchical-structured membrane for ultra-fast microfiltration of oil-water emulsion. Chem Eng J 307:643–64910.1016/j.cej.2016.08.124 ↗
51. Fan H, Ran F, Zhang X, Song H, Jing W, Shen K (2014) A hierarchical porous carbon membrane from polyacrylonitrile/polyvinylpyrrolidone blending membranes: preparation, characterization and electrochemical capacitive performance. J Energy Chem 23:684–69310.1016/S2095-4956(14)60200-X ↗
52. Karpacheva G, Ermilova M, Orekhova N, Efimov M, Zemtsov L, Tereshchenko G (2012) Nanostructured metal–carbon membrane catalysts based on carbonized PAN. Catal Today 186:7–1110.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.019 ↗
53. Tanaka S, Yasuda T, Katayama Y, Miyake Y (2011) Pervaporation dehydration performance of microporous carbon membranes prepared from resorcinol/formaldehyde polymer. J Membr Sci 379:52–5910.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.046 ↗
54. Zhang X, Hu H, Zhu Y, Zhu S (2007) Carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from phenol formaldehyde novolac resin blended with poly(ethylene glycol). J Membr Sci 289:86–9110.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.047 ↗
55. Medrano JA, Garofalo A, Donato L, Basile F, De Santo MP, Gallucci F (2018) CO selective oxidation using catalytic zeolite membranes. Chem Eng J 351:40–4710.1016/j.cej.2018.06.084 ↗
56. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR (2018) Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga pinnata). Carbohydr Polym 181:1038–105110.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045 ↗
57. Abd Jalil SN, Wang DK, Yacou C, Motuzas J, Smart S (2017) Diniz da Costa JC, Vacuum-assisted tailoring of pore structures of phenolic resin derived carbon membranes. J Membr Sci 525:240–24810.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.002 ↗
58. Ostwal M, Lau JM, Orme CJ, Stewart FF, Way JD (2009) The influence of temperature on the sorption and permeability of CO2 in poly(fluoroalkoxyphosphazene) membranes. J Membr Sci 344:199–20310.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.002 ↗
59. Burra KRG, Bassioni G, Gupta AK (2018) Catalytic transformation of H2S for H2 production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:22852–2286010.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.164 ↗
60. Hong X, Zhang B, Zhang X, Wu Y, Wang T, Qiu J (2019) Tailoring the structure and property of microfiltration carbon membranes by polyacrylonitrile-based microspheres for oil-water emulsion separation. J Water Process Eng 32:1–910.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100973 ↗
61. Bao Y, Tay YS, Lim T-T, Wang R, Webster RD, Hu X (2019) Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-induced carbon membrane with in-situ encapsulated cobalt crystal for hybrid peroxymonosulfate oxidation-filtration process: preparation, characterization and performance evaluation. Chem Eng J 373:425–43610.1016/j.cej.2019.05.058 ↗
62. Sazali N, Salleh WNW, Ismail AF (2017) Carbon tubular membranes from nanocrystalline cellulose blended with P84 co-polyimide for H2 and He separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:9952–995710.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.128 ↗
63. Nisar J, Ali G, Ullah N, Awan IA, Iqbal M, Shah A (2018) Pyrolysis of waste tire rubber: influence of temperature on pyrolysates yield. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3469–347310.1016/j.jece.2018.05.021 ↗
64. Mei W, Du Y, Wu T, Gao F, Wang B, Duan J (2018) High-flux CHA zeolite membranes for H2 separations. J Membr Sci 565:358–36910.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.025 ↗
65. Ordoñez MJC, Balkus KJ, Ferraris JP, Musselman IH (2010) Molecular sieving realized with ZIF-8/Matrimid® mixed-matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 361:28–3710.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.017 ↗
66. Cheng XQ, Wang ZX, Jiang X, Li T, Lau CH, Guo Z (2018) Towards sustainable ultrafast molecular-separation membranes: from conventional polymers to emerging materials. Prog Mater Sci 92:258–28310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.006 ↗
67. Etxeberria-Benavides M, Johnson T, Cao S, Zornoza B, Coronas J, Sanchez-Lainez J (2020) PBI mixed matrix hollow fiber membrane: influence of ZIF-8 filler over H2/CO2 separation performance at high temperature and pressure. Sep Purif Technol 237:1–1010.1016/j.seppur.2019.116347 ↗
68. Kluiters SC, Van Den Brink RW, Haije WG (2010) Advanced oxygen production systems for power plants with integrated carbon dioxide (CO2) capture. In: Maroto-Valer MM (ed) Developments and innovation in carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage technology. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 320–35710.1533/9781845699574.3.320 ↗
69. Yáñez M, Ortiz A, Gorri D, Ortiz I (2020) Comparative performance of commercial polymeric membranes in the recovery of industrial hydrogen waste gas streams. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.02610.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.026 ↗
70. Liu Z, Fan J (2014) Technology readiness assessment of small modular reactor (SMR) designs. Prog Nucl Energy 70:20–2810.1016/j.pnucene.2013.07.005 ↗
71. Mignacca B, Locatelli G (2020) Economics and finance of small modular reactors: a systematic review and research agenda. Renew Sust Energy Rev 118:1–1510.1016/j.rser.2019.109519 ↗
72. Wu W, Yang Q, Su B (2018) Centimeter-scale continuous silica isoporous membranes for molecular sieving. J Membr Sci 558:86–9310.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.024 ↗
73. Hazazi K, Ma X, Wang Y, Ogieglo W, Alhazmi A, Han Y (2019) Ultra-selective carbon molecular sieve membranes for natural gas separations based on a carbon-rich intrinsically microporous polyimide precursor. J Membr Sci 585:1–910.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.020 ↗
74. Han W, Dong S, Li B, Ge L (2017) Preparation of polyacrylonitrile- based porous hollow carbon microspheres. Colloids Surf A 520:467–47610.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.009 ↗
75. Sim YH, Wang H, Li FY, Chua ML, Chung T-S, Toriida M (2013) High performance carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from hyperbranched polyimide precursors for improved gas separation applications. Carbon 53:101–11110.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.036 ↗
76. Salleh WNW, Ismail AF (2015) Carbon membranes for gas separation processes: recent progress and future perspective. J Membr Sci Res 1:2–15
77. Briceño K, Iulianelli A, Montané D, Garcia-Valls R, Basile A (2012) Carbon molecular sieve membranes supported on non-modified ceramic tubes for hydrogen separation in membrane reactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:13536–1354410.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.069 ↗
78. Li L, Xu R, Song C, Zhang B, Liu Q, Wang T (2018) A review on the progress in nanoparticle/c hybrid CMS membranes for gas separation. Membranes (Basel) 8:134–16610.3390/membranes8040134 ↗
79. Lee P-S, Kim D, Nam S-E, Bhave RR (2016) Carbon molecular sieve membranes on porous composite tubular supports for high performance gas separations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 224:332–33810.1016/j.micromeso.2015.12.054 ↗
80. Ogieglo W, Puspasari T, Hota MK, Wehbe N, Alshareef HN, Pinnau I (2020) Nanohybrid thin-film composite carbon molecular sieve membranes. Mater Today Nano 9:10006510.1016/j.mtnano.2019.100065 ↗
81. Sanyal O, Hicks ST, Bhuwania N, Hays S, Kamath MG, Karwa S (2018) Cause and effects of hyperskin features on carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes. J Membr Sci 551:113–12210.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.021 ↗
82. Zhang ZP, Rong MZ, Zhang MQ (2018) Polymer engineering based on reversible covalent chemistry: a promising innovative pathway towards new materials and new functionalities. Prog Polym Sci 80:39–9310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.03.002 ↗
83. Hu C-P, Polintan CK, Tayo LL, Chou S-C, Tsai H-A, Hung W-S (2019) The gas separation performance adjustment of carbon molecular sieve membrane depending on the chain rigidity and free volume characteristic of the polymeric precursor. Carbon 143:343–35110.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.037 ↗
84. Czympiel L, Frank M, Mettenbörger A, Hühne S-M, Mathur S (2018) High activity heterogeneous catalysts by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of volatile palladium complexes on biomorphic carbon. CR Chim 21:943–95110.1016/j.crci.2018.04.008 ↗
85. Tseng H-H, Wang C-T, Zhuang G-L, Uchytil P, Reznickova J, Setnickova K (2016) Enhanced H2/CH4 and H2/CO2 separation by carbon molecular sieve membrane coated on titania modified alumina support: effects of TiO2 intermediate layer preparation variables on interfacial adhesion. J Membr Sci 510:391–40410.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.036 ↗
86. Llosa Tanco MA, Pacheco Tanaka DA, Mendes A (2015) Composite-alumina-carbon molecular sieve membranes prepared from novolac resin and boehmite. Part II: effect of the carbonization temperature on the gas permeation properties. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:3485–349610.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.025 ↗
87. Shin JH, Yu HJ, Park J, Lee AS, Hwang SS, Kim S-J (2020) Fluorine-containing polyimide/polysilsesquioxane carbon molecular sieve membranes and techno-economic evaluation thereof for C3H6/C3H8 separation. J Membr Sci 598:1–910.1016/j.memsci.2019.117660 ↗
88. Borghei M, Laocharoen N, Kibena-Põldsepp E, Johansson L-S, Campbell J, Kauppinen E, Porous N (2017) P-doped carbon from coconut shells with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction: alternative to Pt-C for alkaline fuel cells. Appl Catal B 294:394–40210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.029 ↗
89. Rodrigues SC, Andrade M, Moffat J, Magalhães FD, Mendes A (2019) Preparation of carbon molecular sieve membranes from an optimized ionic liquid-regenerated cellulose precursor. J Membr Sci 572:390–40010.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.027 ↗
90. Gilron J, Soffer A (2002) Knudsen diffusion in microporous carbon membranes with molecular sieving character. J Membr Sci 209:339–35210.1016/S0376-7388(02)00074-1 ↗
91. Wan SWN, Fauzi IA (2012) Fabrication and characterization of PEI/PVP-based carbon hollow fiber membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separation. AIChE J 58:3167–317510.1002/aic.13711 ↗
92. Cao L, Tao K, Huang A, Kong C, Chen L (2013) A highly permeable mixed matrix membrane containing CAU-1-NH2 for H2 and CO2 separation. Chem Commun 49:8513–851510.1039/c3cc44530e ↗
93. Sánchez-Laínez J, Zornoza B, Mayoral Á, Berenguer-Murcia Á, Cazorla-Amorós D, Téllez C (2015) Beyond the H2/CO2 upper bound: one-step crystallization and separation of nano-sized ZIF-11 by centrifugation and its application in mixed matrix membranes. J Mater Chem A 3:6549–655610.1039/C4TA06820C ↗
94. Rohani R, Kalkhorana H, Chung YT (2019) Polymeric mixed matrix membranes incorporated with graphene oxide for H2/CO2 separation. J Teknol 81:19–20
95. Ali A, Pothu R, Siyal SH, Phulpoto S, Sajjad M, Thebo KH (2019) Graphene-based membranes for CO2 separation. Mater Sci Energy Technol 2:83–88
96. Chen M, Soyekwo F, Zhang Q, Hu C, Zhu A, Liu Q (2018) Graphene oxide nanosheets to improve permeability and selectivity of PIM-1 membrane for carbon dioxide separation. J Ind Eng Chem 63:296–30210.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.030 ↗
97. Liu Y (2019) Beyond graphene oxides: emerging 2D molecular sieve membranes for efficient separation. Chin J Chem Eng 27:1257–127110.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.019 ↗
98. Sun C, Bai B (2017) Molecular sieving through a graphene nanopore: non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Bull 63:554–56210.1016/j.scib.2017.03.004 ↗
99. Hatori H, Takagi H, Yamada Y (2004) Gas separation properties of molecular sieving carbon membranes with nanopore channels. Carbon 42:1169–117310.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.051 ↗
100. Rao MB, Sircar S (1993) Nanoporous carbon membranes for separation of gas mixtures by selective surface flow. J Membr Sci 85:253–26410.1016/0376-7388(93)85279-6 ↗