Superior EMI shielding performance of thermally stable carbon nanofiber/poly(ether-ketone) composites in 26.5–40 GHz frequency range
Source abstract
Abstract
An electromagnetic radiation shielding material (ERSM) based on carbon nanofiber-reinforced poly(ether-ketone) composite was prepared via corotating twin screw extruder and then injection-molded into dog bone-shaped specimens for testing. In order to design this type of material ERSM, electrical conductivity was targeted as key property using a conducting inclusion, carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Electrical conductivity increased from ~10−13 S/cm for neat PEK to ~10−3 S/cm for samples having 14 vol % (20 wt%) of CNFs, which was close to the requirement for microwave shielding. Nanocomposites are shown to exhibit up to −40 dB (>99.999 % attenuation) of total shielding effectiveness at 14 vol % (20 wt%) loading in the frequency range of 26.5–40 GHz (Ka band). This formulation of nanocomposites (14 vol % loading) shows shielding effectiveness due to absorption of ~−37 dB with very less reflection loss of ~−3 dB in the prescribed frequency range. Achievement of such high absorption-dominant shielding effectiveness (−37 dB) along with high thermal stability (T0.25 ~ 614 °C) and mechanical strength (tensile strength ~112 MPa and tensile modulus ~7.2 GPa) substantiates its capability as light weight, thermally stable, and mechanically strong EMI shields for demanding applications such as aerospace, defense, and space applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Klemperer CJv, Maharaj D (2009) Composite electromagnetic interference shielding materials for aerospace applications. Compos Struct 91(4):467–47210.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.013 ↗
2. Thomassin J-M, Jérôme C, Pardoen T, Bailly C, Huynen I, Detrembleur C (2013) Polymer/carbon based composites as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. Mater Sci Eng 74(7):211–23210.1016/j.mser.2013.06.001 ↗
3. Meng Q, Li Z, Zhu Y, Feng D, Tan H (2016) Mechanical and X-band dielectric properties of vitrified bonded SiC composites. Mater Des 92:18–2210.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.035 ↗
4. Kuzhir P, Maksimenko S, Bychanok D, Kuznetsov V, Moseenkov S, Mazov I et al (2009) Nano-scaled onion-like carbon: prospective material for microwave coatings. Metamaterials 3(3–4):148–15610.1016/j.metmat.2009.07.002 ↗
5. Yang S, Lozano K, Lomeli A, Foltz HD, Jones R (2005) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon nanofiber/LCP composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 36(5):691–69710.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.009 ↗
6. Jyoti J, Basu S, Singh BP, Dhakate SR (2015) Superior mechanical and electrical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene high performance composites. Compos Part B: Eng 83:58–6510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.055 ↗
7. Pande S, Singh BP, Mathur RB, Dhami TL, Saini P, Dhawan SK (2009) Improved electromagnetic interference shielding properties of MWCNT-PMMA composites using layered structures. Nanoscale Res Lett 4(4):327–33410.1007/s11671-008-9246-x ↗
8. Kashi S, Gupta RK, Baum T, Kao N, Bhattacharya SN (2016) Morphology, electromagnetic properties and electromagnetic interference shielding performance of poly lactide/graphene nanoplatelet nanocomposites. Mater Des 95:119–12610.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.086 ↗
9. Chen X, Liu L, Liu J, Pan F (2015) Microstructure, electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of Mg–Zn–Y–Zr alloys. Mater Des 65:360–36910.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.034 ↗
10. Rahaman M, Chaki T, Khastgir D (2011) Development of high performance EMI shielding material from EVA, NBR, and their blends: effect of carbon black structure. J Mater Sci 46(11):3989–3999. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5326-x10.1007/s10853-011-5326-x ↗
11. Gupta TK, Singh BP, Teotia S, Katyal V, Dhakate SR, Mathur RB (2013) Designing of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced polyurethane composites as electromagnetic interference shielding materials. J Polym Res 20(6):1–710.1007/s10965-013-0169-6 ↗
12. von Klemperer C, Langdon G, Maharaj D, Shivute D (2009) Metallic filler powders to improve the electromagnetic shielding of FRP laminates. Proc 17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-17), Edinburgh
13. Shielding Markham D (2000) Quantifying the shielding requirements for portable electronic design and providing new solutions by using a combination of materials and design. Mater Des 21(1):45–5010.1016/S0261-3069(99)00049-7 ↗
14. Das NC, Chaki TK, Khastgir D, Chakraborty A (2001) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of conductive carbon black and carbon fiber-filled composites based on rubber and rubber blends. Adv Polym Technol 20(3):226–23610.1002/adv.1018 ↗
15. Das NC, Khastgir D, Chaki TK, Chakraborty A (2000) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon black and carbon fibre filled EVA and NR based composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 31(10):1069–108110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00064-6 ↗
16. Enríquez E, de Frutos J, Fernández JF, de la Rubia MA (2014) Conductive coatings with low carbon-black content by adding carbon nanofibers. Compos Sci Technol 93:9–1610.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.021 ↗
17. Bal S (2010) Experimental study of mechanical and electrical properties of carbon nanofiber/epoxy composites. Mater Des 31(5):2406–241310.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.058 ↗
18. Nayak L, Khastgir D, Chaki TK (2013) A mechanistic study on electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of polysulfone/carbon nanofibers nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 48(4):1492–1502. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6904-210.1007/s10853-012-6904-2 ↗
19. Nanni F, Travaglia P, Valentini M (2009) Effect of carbon nanofibres dispersion on the microwave absorbing properties of CNF/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(3–4):485–49010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.026 ↗
20. Al-Saleh MH, Saadeh WH, Sundararaj U (2013) EMI shielding effectiveness of carbon based nanostructured polymeric materials: a comparative study. Carbon 60:146–15610.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.008 ↗
21. Yonglai Y, Mool CG, Kenneth LD (2007) Towards cost-efficient EMI shielding materials using carbon nanostructure-based nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 18(34):345701. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/34/34570110.1088/0957-4484/18/34/345701 ↗
22. Al-Saleh MH, Gelves GA, Sundararaj U (2013) Carbon nanofiber/polyethylene nanocomposite: processing behavior, microstructure and electrical properties. Mater Des 52:128–13310.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.038 ↗
23. Ray M, George JJ, Chakraborty A, Bhowmick AK (2010) An investigation of the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of ethylene vinyl acetate elastomer reinforced with carbon nanofillers. Polym Polym Compos 18(2):59–65
24. Nayak L, Chaki TK, Khastgir D (2014) Electrical percolation behavior and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of polyimide nanocomposites filled with carbon nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci. doi: 10.1002/app.4091410.1002/app.40914 ↗
25. Wright WW (1991) Polymers in aerospace applications. Mater Des 12(4):222–22710.1016/0261-3069(91)90169-5 ↗
26. Rao V, Sabeena P, Ninan K (1998) Synthesis and properties of polyether ketone and polyether ketone sulfone copolymers. Eur Polym J 34(3–4):567–570
27. Wang Y, Wang P, Xu Q, Yan T, Cai M (2014) Synthesis and properties of novel copolymers of poly(ether ketone biphenyl ketone ether ketone ketone) and poly(ether ketone sulfone amide). J Polym Res 21(8):1–8
28. Al-Saleh MH (2015) Electrically conductive carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposite with improved mechanical properties. Mater Des 85:76–8110.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.162 ↗
29. Amrin S, Deshpande VD (2015) Electrical properties and conduction mechanism in carboxyl-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes/poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. J Mater Sci 51(5):2453–2464. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9558-z10.1007/s10853-015-9558-z ↗
30. Verma M, Singh AP, Sambyal P, Singh BP, Dhawan S, Choudhary V (2015) Barium ferrite decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for effective electromagnetic interference shielding. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(3):1610–161810.1039/C4CP04284K ↗
31. Singh BK, Kar P, Shrivastava NK, Banerjee S, Khatua BB (2012) Electrical and mechanical properties of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene/multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposites prepared by melt-blending. J Appl Polym Sci 124(4):3165–317410.1002/app.34948 ↗
32. Gupta A, Choudhary V (2011) Electrical conductivity and shielding effectiveness of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. J Mater Sci 46(19):6416–6423. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5591-810.1007/s10853-011-5591-8 ↗
33. Aharony A, Stauffer D (2003) Introduction To Percolation Theory. Taylor & Francis, London
34. Linares A, Canalda JC, Cagiao ME, García-Gutiérrez MC, Nogales A, Martín-Gullón I et al (2008) Broad-Band Electrical Conductivity of High Density Polyethylene Nanocomposites with Carbon Nanoadditives: multiwall Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibers. Macromolecules 41(19):7090–709710.1021/ma801410j ↗
35. Frackowiak S, Ludwiczak J, Leluk K, Orzechowski K, Kozlowski M (2015) Foamed poly (lactic acid) composites with carbonaceous fillers for electromagnetic shielding. Mater Des 65:749–75610.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.009 ↗
36. Jia L-C, Yan D-X, Cui C-H, Jiang X, Ji X, Li Z-M (2015) Electrically conductive and electromagnetic interference shielding of polyethylene composites with devisable carbon nanotube networks. J Mater Chem C 3(36):9369–937810.1039/C5TC01822F ↗
37. Verma P, Saini P, Malik RS, Choudhary V (2015) Excellent electromagnetic interference shielding and mechanical properties of high loading carbon-nanotubes/polymer composites designed using melt recirculation equipped twin-screw extruder. Carbon 89:308–31710.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.063 ↗
38. Singh B, Saini P, Gupta T, Garg P, Kumar G, Pande I et al (2011) Designing of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced low density polyethylene nanocomposites for suppression of electromagnetic radiation. J Nanopart Res 13(12):7065–707410.1007/s11051-011-0619-1 ↗
39. Chung DDL (2001) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials. Carbon 39(2):279–28510.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-6 ↗
40. Saini P, Choudhary V, Singh B, Mathur R, Dhawan S (2011) Enhanced microwave absorption behavior of polyaniline-CNT/polystyrene blend in 12.4–18.0 GHz range. Synth Met 161(15):1522–152610.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.033 ↗
41. Liu PS, Qing HB, Hou HL, Wang YQ, Zhang YL (2016) EMI shielding and thermal conductivity of a high porosity reticular titanium foam. Mater Des 92:823–82810.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.105 ↗
42. Pande S, Singh B, Mathur R, Dhami T, Saini P, Dhawan S (2009) Improved electromagnetic interference shielding properties of MWCNT–PMMA composites using layered structures. Nanoscale Res Lett 4(4):327–33410.1007/s11671-008-9246-x ↗
43. Saini P, Arora M (2012) Microwave Absorption and EMI Shielding Behavior of Nanocomposites Based on Intrinsically Conducting Polymers. Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/4877910.5772/48779 ↗
44. Zhang L, Wang LB, See KY, Ma J (2013) Effect of carbon nanofiber reinforcement on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of syntactic foam. J Mater Sci 48(21):7757–7763. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7597-x10.1007/s10853-013-7597-x ↗
45. Verma P, Saini P, Choudhary V (2015) Designing of carbon nanotube/polymer composites using melt recirculation approach: effect of aspect ratio on mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding response. Mater Des 88:269–27710.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.156 ↗
46. Lee BO, Woo WJ, Park HS, Hahm HS, Wu JP, Kim MS (2002) Influence of aspect ratio and skin effect on EMI shielding of coating materials fabricated with carbon nanofiber/PVDF. J Mater Sci 37(9):1839–1843. doi: 10.1023/A:101497052848210.1023/A:1014970528482 ↗
47. Gupta TK, Singh BP, Dhakate SR, Singh VN, Mathur RB (2013) Improved nanoindentation and microwave shielding properties of modified MWCNT reinforced polyurethane composites. J Mater Chem A 1(32):9138–914910.1039/c3ta11611e ↗
48. Kumar R, Dhakate SR, Gupta T, Saini P, Singh BP, Mathur RB (2013) Effective improvement of the properties of light weight carbon foam by decoration with multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem A 1(18):5727–573510.1039/c3ta10604g ↗
49. Lozano K, Barrera EV (2001) Nanofiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. I. Thermoanalytical and mechanical analyses. J Appl Polym Sci 79(1):125–13310.1002/1097-4628(20010103)79:1<125::AID-APP150>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
50. Higgins BA, Brittain WJ (2005) Polycarbonate carbon nanofiber composites. Eur Polym J 41(5):889–89310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.11.040 ↗
51. Al-Saleh MH, Sundararaj U (2009) A review of vapor grown carbon nanofiber/polymer conductive composites. Carbon 47(1):2–2210.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.039 ↗
52. Green KJ, Dean DR, Vaidya UK, Nyairo E (2009) Multiscale fiber reinforced composites based on a carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanophased polymer matrix: synthesis, mechanical, and thermomechanical behavior. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 40(9):1470–147510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.05.010 ↗
53. Ahmadi M, Masoomi M, Safi S (2015) Mechanical property characterization of carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by GMA-grafted UHMWPE fibers. Compos Part B: Eng 83:43–4910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.006 ↗
54. Tsantzalis S, Karapappas P, Vavouliotis A, Tsotra P, Kostopoulos V, Tanimoto T et al (2007) On the improvement of toughness of CFRPs with resin doped with CNF and PZT particles. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 38(4):1159–116210.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.016 ↗