journal article·2014-03

Response of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells to the microenvironment produced on Co–Cr–Mo alloy using laser surface texturing

Liguo Qin, Qunfeng Zeng, Wenxing Wang, Yali Zhang, Guangneng Dong

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Osteoblast responses to Co–Cr–Mo alloy depend on not only the chemistry of alloy but also the physical properties of alloy surface, such as its microtopography and roughness. This study was undertaken to examine changes in cell adhesion, morphology, differentiation and gene expression during osteoblast interaction with different textured Co–Cr–Mo alloys. With laser surface texturing, three kinds of textured surfaces were fabricated. It showed that the microenvironment processed by laser surface texturing leads to an increase in surface roughness and DMEM contact angles of samples. Adhesion and differentiation tests demonstrated that osteoblast cells can discriminate surfaces with different roughness and surfaces with comparable roughness but different topographies such as triangle, circle and square textures. Morphological characteristics obtained by SEM imaging showed that osteoblast cells are elongated and are in polygonal shape on the textured surface. OPG/RANKL mRNA expression studies showed a significant and marked decrease in RANKL gene expression on the square-textured surface; by contrast, the ratio of OPG/RANKL showed a significant increase. These results indicate that Co–Cr–Mo surface textures affect osteoblast proliferation, morphology and gene expression; the microenvironment of implant should be considered in the future design.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Katti KS (2004) Biomaterials in total joint replacement. Colloids Surf B 39:133–14210.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.002 ↗
2. Cawley J, Metcalf JEP, Jones AH, Band TJ, Skupien DS (2003) A tribological study of cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys used in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Wear 255:999–100610.1016/S0043-1648(03)00046-2 ↗
3. Wimmer MA, Loos J, Nassutt R, Heitkemper M, Fischer A (2001) The acting wear mechanisms on metal-on-metal hip joint bearings: in vitro results. Wear 250:129–13910.1016/S0043-1648(01)00654-8 ↗
4. Myant C, Underwood R, Fan J, Cann PM (2012) Lubrication of metal-on-metal hip joints: the effect of protein content and load on film formation and wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 6:30–4010.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.008 ↗
5. Serro AP, Gispert MP, Martins MCL, Brogueira P, Colaço R, Saramago B (2006) Adsorption of albumin on prosthetic materials: implication for tribological behavior. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 78A:581–58910.1002/jbm.a.30754 ↗
6. Wang Q, Zhang L, Shen H (2010) Microstructure analysis of plasma nitrided cast/forged CoCrMo alloys. Surf Coat Technol 205:2654–266010.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.10.031 ↗
7. Türkan U, Öztürk O, Eroğlu AE (2006) Metal ion release from TiN coated CoCrMo orthopedic implant material. Surf Coat Technol 200:5020–502710.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.05.005 ↗
8. Dittrick S, Balla VK, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2011) In vitro wear rate and Co Ion release of compositionally and structurally graded CoCrMo–Ti6Al4V structures. Mater Sci Eng C 31:809–81410.1016/j.msec.2010.07.009 ↗
9. Roy M, Vamsi Krishna B, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S (2008) Laser processing of bioactive tricalcium phosphate coating on titanium for load-bearing implants. Acta Biomater 4:324–33310.1016/j.actbio.2007.09.008 ↗
10. Wang X, Adachi K, Otsuka K, Kato K (2006) Optimization of the surface texture for silicon carbide sliding in water. Appl Surf Sci 253:1282–128610.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.076 ↗
11. Im BJ, Lee SW, Oh N, Lee MH, Kang JH, Leesungbok R et al (2012) Texture direction of combined microgrooves and submicroscale topographies of titanium substrata influence adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in human primary cells. Arch Oral Biol 57:898–90510.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.013 ↗
12. Peng R, Yao X, Ding J (2011) Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. Biomaterials 32:8048–805710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.035 ↗
13. Wan Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Qu X, Han B, Bei J et al (2005) Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(l-lactide). Biomaterials 26:4453–445910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.016 ↗
14. Alom Ruiz S, Chen CS (2007) Microcontact printing: a tool to pattern. Soft Matter 3:16810.1039/B613349E ↗
15. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M (2010) Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4872–487710.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
16. Kulangara K, Yang Y, Yang J, Leong KW (2012) Nanotopography as modulator of human mesenchymal stem cell function. Biomaterials 33:4998–500310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.053 ↗
17. Peng R, Yao X, Cao B, Tang J, Ding J (2012) The effect of culture conditions on the adipogenic and osteogenic inductions of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned surfaces. Biomaterials 33:6008–601910.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.010 ↗
18. Schneider GB, Zaharia R, Stanford C (2001) Osteoblast integrin adhesion and signaling regulate mineralization. J Dent Res 80:1540–154410.1177/00220345010800061201 ↗
19. Yamada KM, Pankov R, Cukierman E (2003) Dimensions and dynamics in integrin function. Braz J Med Biol Res 36:959–96610.1590/S0100-879X2003000800001 ↗
20. Wiesner S, Legate KR, Fässler R (2005) Integrin–actin interactions. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:001–01910.1007/s00018-005-4522-8 ↗
21. Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM, Giazzon M, Liley M, Ploux L (2010) The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater 6:3824–384610.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001 ↗
22. Bauer S, Schmuki P, von der Mark K, Park J (2013) Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces: Part I: materials and surfaces. Prog Mater Sci 58:261–32610.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.09.001 ↗
23. Xavier SP, Carvalho PSP, Beloti MM, Rosa AL (2003) Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. J Dent 31:173–18010.1016/S0300-5712(03)00027-7 ↗
24. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, Ruml T, Svorcik V (2011) Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv 29:739–76710.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 ↗
25. Ji B, Bao G (2011) Cell and molecular biomechanics: perspectives and challenges. Acta Mech Solida Sin 24:27–5110.1016/S0894-9166(11)60008-6 ↗
26. Kermer V, Ritter M, Albuquerque B, Leib C, Stanke M, Zimmermann H (2010) Knockdown of tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase impairs neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Neurosci Lett 485:208–21110.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.013 ↗
27. Bacáková L, Filová E, Rypácek F, Svorcík V, Starý V (2004) Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res 53:35–4510.33549/physiolres.930000.53.S35 ↗
28. Yuan Z, Baohua J (2013) Impact of cell shape on cell migration behavior on elastic substrate. Biofabrication 5(015011):1–10
29. Yuan Z, Shijie H, Baohua J (2012) Mechanics in mechanosensitivity of cell adhesion and its roles in cell migration. Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng 4(1250032):1–2110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.001 ↗
30. Tanaka H, Mine T, Ogasa H, Taguchi T, Liang CT (2011) Expression of RANKL/OPG during bone remodeling in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 411:690–69410.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.001 ↗