Effect of Surface Pretreatment and Plating Time on Electromagnetic Shielding Reliability of Electroless Plated Copper Layer Conductors
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated the electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effect of copper conducting films prepared by electroless plating. The various EMI shielding films were made at different plating times (10, 20, 30, and 40 min). The influences of pretreatment and plating time on microstructure, thickness, adhesion (e.g., cross-cutting and pencil hardness), and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness were evaluated. The morphological features and thickness of EMI shielding films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods. The experimental results show that the best outcome of adhesion and electromagnetic shielding effectiveness was obtained at the pretreated film with 30 min of plating time. The pretreated film showed a cross-cutting 5B grade, 4H pencil hardness, and 75 dB shielding effectiveness. The results of electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of films indicate that a longer plating time (10–30 min) results in better electromagnetic shielding effectiveness. However, the adhesive strength becomes worse if the plating time is longer than 40 min.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Seoul, 163 Seoulsiripdaero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02504, Republic of Korea
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Asan-si 31489, Republic of Korea
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, South Korea
Funding
Small and Medium Business Administration
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00332-010.1016/S0379-6779(01)00332-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.043 ↗
3. Kesari K. K. · Indian J. Exp. Biol. · 2013 · 51 · 187
4. Thomas T. L. · J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. · 1987 · 79 · 233
5. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-610.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-6 ↗
6. Brzeziński S. · Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe · 2009 · 17 · 66
7. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.11510.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.115 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13128810.1016/j.cej.2021.131288 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0TC05493C10.1039/D0TC05493C ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12336810.1016/j.cej.2019.123368 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.03410.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.034 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.8b0049210.1021/acsami.8b00492 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.0c1439710.1021/acsami.0c14397 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.02.06110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.02.061 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.040 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01824-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01824-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.04010.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.040 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.37322310.1063/1.373223 ↗
19. 10.1023/A:100961971101710.1023/A:1009619711017 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.02710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.027 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.02.02610.1016/j.tsf.2017.02.026 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10854-016-5592-010.1007/s10854-016-5592-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63039-910.1016/S1003-6326(14)63039-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.01310.1016/j.ceramint.2011.03.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/0376-7388(93)85068-810.1016/0376-7388(93)85068-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.05.00510.1016/j.tsf.2011.05.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.05310.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.053 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.002 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.183743410.1149/1.1837434 ↗
30. Nag A. · 2019 · 33 · 115
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-09326-310.1038/s41467-019-09326-3 ↗
32. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00556-410.1016/S0040-6090(02)00556-4 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.00610.1016/j.tsf.2014.07.006 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11661-015-3313-610.1007/s11661-015-3313-6 ↗
36. ASTM · 2010
37. JESD22A-101B Steady State Temperature Humidity Bias Life Test, Electronic Industries Association, Engineering Department, JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, 2015.
38. ASTM · 2010
39. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/8/00710.1088/0953-8984/18/8/007 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.03110.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.031 ↗
41. 10.1039/C8EE01979G10.1039/C8EE01979G ↗
42. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.07510.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.075 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.002 ↗
44. Cui, X.; Hutt, D. A.; Conway, P. P. An investigation of electroless copper films deposited on glass. InProc. 2nd IEEE Electronics System-Integration Technology Conf. London, 1–4 Sept 2008; pp 105–110.10.1109/ESTC.2008.4684333 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.03310.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.033 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.043 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.006 ↗
48. 10.1002/pat.58910.1002/pat.589 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00234-310.1016/S0379-6779(98)00234-3 ↗
50. 1998
51. Ninghi Y. H. · Nanotubes · 2006 · 6 · 1141
52. 10.1179/1432891714Z.00000000067610.1179/1432891714Z.000000000676 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11356-020-09322-x10.1007/s11356-020-09322-x ↗