journal article·2017-10

Structure–performance study of polyamide composite nanofiltration membranes prepared with polyethyleneimine

Xiuzhen Wei, Jialiang Hong, Shuangshuang Zhu, Jinyuan Chen, Bosheng Lv

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Polyethyleneimine (PEI) of various molecular weights and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) were utilized to prepare composite nanofiltration (NF) membranes via interfacial polymerization. The changes in the surface structure and chemical composition of the prepared membranes were evaluated using SEM, ATR-FTIR, XPS and surface potential measurements. The pure-water flux and rejection rates of the inorganic salts (MgCl2, MgSO4, Na2SO4 and NaCl) through the resultant NF membranes were also investigated. The results showed that the performance of the composite NF membranes was significantly affected by the molecular weight of the PEI. Notably, the permeate flux and rejection rate of the NF membranes increased with the PEI molecular weight. In addition, when the NF membranes were used to treat actual wastewater from the electroplating industry, the NF membranes presented high-efficiency separation properties for heavy metal ions. The rejection rates of the NF membranes at 0.4 MPa for chromium, nickel, zinc and copper ions reached 92.6, 89.6, 89.2 and 86.3%, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Yin J, Deng B-L (2015) Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. J Membr Sci 479:256–27510.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 ↗
2. Dias EM, Petit C (2015) Towards the use of metal-organic frameworks for water reuse: a review of the recent advances in the field of organic pollutants removal and degradation and the next steps in the field. J Mater Chem A 3:51510.1039/C4TA04272G ↗
3. Li H, Zhao X-Y, Wu P-F, Zhang S-X, Geng B (2016) Facile preparation of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic porous polymer membranes for oil/water separation from a polyarylester polydimethylsiloxane block copolymer. J Mater Sci 51:3211–3218. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9632-610.1007/s10853-015-9632-6 ↗
4. Mou P, Jons SD (2016) Chemistry and fabrication of polymeric nanofiltration membranes: a review. Polymer 103:417–45610.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.085 ↗
5. Chiang Y-C, Hsub YZ, Ruaan RC, Chuang C-J, Tung K-L (2009) Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine. J Membr Sci 326:19–2610.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.021 ↗
6. Liu F, Ma B-R, Zhou D, Zhu L-J, Fu Y-Y, Xue L-X (2015) Positively charged loose nanofiltration membrane grafted by diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC) via UV for salt and dye removal. React Funct Polym 86:191–19810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.003 ↗
7. Wei X-Z, Shi Y-Y, Fei Y-W, Chen J-Y, Lv B-S, Chen Y-S, Zheng H-L, Shen J-L, Zhu LP (2016) Removal of trace phthalate esters from water by thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes. Chem Eng J 292:382–38810.1016/j.cej.2016.02.037 ↗
8. Kong X, Zhang Y, Zeng S-Y, Zhu B-K, Zhu L-P, Fang L-F, Matsuyama H (2017) Incorporating hyperbranched polyester into cross-linked polyamide layer to enhance both permeability and selectivity of nanofiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 518:141–14910.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.037 ↗
9. Zinadini S (2016) Preparation and characterization of high flux PES nanofiltration membrane using hydrophilic nanoparticles by phase inversion method for application in advanced wastewater treatment. J Appl Res Water Wastewater 3:232–235
10. Xue X-Y, Cheng R, Shi L, Ma Z, Zheng X (2017) Nanomaterials for water pollution monitoring and remediation. Environ Chem Lett 15:23–2710.1007/s10311-016-0595-x ↗
11. Usmani MA, Khan I, Bhat AH, Pillai RS, Ahmad N, Haafiz MKM, Oves M (2017) Current trend in the application of nanoparticles for waste water treatment and purification: a review. Curr Org Synth 14:206–22610.2174/1570179413666160928125328 ↗
12. Racar M, Dolar D, Spehar A, Kosutic K (2017) Application of UF/NF/RO membranes for treatment and reuse of rendering plant wastewater. Process Saf Environ 105:386–39210.1016/j.psep.2016.11.015 ↗
13. Korotta-Gamage SM, Sathasivan A (2017) A review: potential and challenges of biologically activated carbon to remove natural organic matter in drinking water purification process. Chemosphere 167:120–13810.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.097 ↗
14. Salgado CM, Fernández-Fernández E, Palacio L, Carmona FJ, Hernandez A, Pradanos P (2017) Application of pervaporation and nanofiltration membrane processes for the elaboration of full flavored low alcohol white wines. Food Bioprod Process 101:11–2110.1016/j.fbp.2016.10.001 ↗
15. Cheng X-Q, Zhang Y-L, Wang Z-X, Guo Z-H, Bai Y-P, Shao L (2014) Recent advances in polymeric solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes. Adv Polym Technol 33(S1):21455(E1–E24)10.1002/adv.21455 ↗
16. Cheng S-Y, Oatley DL, Williams PM, Wright CJ (2011) Positively charged nanofiltration membranes: review of current fabrication methods and introduction of a novel approach. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 164:12–2010.1016/j.cis.2010.12.010 ↗
17. Székely G, Valtcheva IB, Kim JF, Livingston AG (2015) Molecularly imprinted organic solvent nanofiltration membranes—revealing molecular recognition and solute rejection behavior. React Funct Polym 86:215–22410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.03.008 ↗
18. Dubreuil MFS, Servaes K, Ormerod D, Houtven DV, Porto-carrero W, Vandezande P, Vanermen G, Buekenhoudt A (2017) Selective membrane separation technology for biomass valorization towards bio-aromatics. Sep Purif Technol 178:56–6510.1016/j.seppur.2016.12.033 ↗
19. Schaepertoens M, Didaskalou C, Kim JF, Livingston AG, Szekely G (2016) Solvent recycle with imperfect membranes: a semi-continuous workaround for diafiltration. J Membr Sci 514:646–65810.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.056 ↗
20. Ormerod D, Lefevre N, Dorbec M, Eyskens I, Vloemans P, Duyssens K, de la Torre VD, Kaval N, Merkul E, Sergeyev S (2016) Potential of homogeneous Pd catalyst separation by ceramic membranes. Application to downstream and continuous flow processes. Org Process Res Dev 20:911–92010.1021/acs.oprd.5b00418 ↗
21. Razali M, Kim JF, Attfield M, Budd PM, Drioli E, Lee YM, Szekely G (2015) Sustainable wastewater treatment and recycling in membrane manufacturing. Green Chem 17:5196–520510.1039/C5GC01937K ↗
22. Yampolskii Y (2012) Polymeric gas separation membranes. Macromolecules 45:3298–331110.1021/ma300213b ↗
23. Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H, Darwish NA, Mohamma AW, Arabi MA (2004) A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 170:281–30810.1016/j.desal.2004.01.007 ↗
24. Lv Y, Yang H-C, Liang H-Q, Wan L-S, Xu Z-K (2015) Nanofiltration membranes via co-deposition of polydopamine/polyethylenimine followed by cross-linking. J Membr Sci 476:50–5810.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.024 ↗
25. Setiawan L, Rong W, Kang L, Fane AG (2011) Fabrication of novel poly(amide–imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer. J Membr Sci 369:196–20510.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.067 ↗
26. Zhang R-N, Su Y-L, Zhao X-T, Li Y-F, Zhao J-J, Jiang Z-Y (2014) A novel positively charged composite nanofiltration membrane prepared by bio-inspired adhesion of polydopamine and surface grafting of poly(ethylene imine). J Membr Sci 470:9–1710.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.006 ↗
27. Wang H-F, Zhang Q-F, Zhang S-B (2011) Positively charged nanofiltration membrane formed by interfacial polymerization of 3,3′,5,5′-biphenyl tetraacyl chloride and piperazine on a poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) support. Fuel Energy Abstr 378:243–249
28. Miao J, Zhang R, Bai R-B (2016) Development and characterization of quaternized poly (vinyl alcohol) composite nanofiltration membranes. J Mater Sci 51:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9492-010.1007/s10853-015-9492-0 ↗
29. Fang W-X, Shi L, Wang R (2013) Interfacially polymerized composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for low-pressure water softening. J Membr Sci 430:129–13910.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.011 ↗
30. Sun S-P, Hatton TA, Chan S-Y, Chung T-S (2012) Novel thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with double repulsion for effective removal of emerging organic matters from water. J Membr Sci 401:152–16210.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.046 ↗
31. Perez-Manriquez L, Aburabi’e J, Neelakanda P, Peinemann KV (2015) Cross-linked PAN-based thin-film composite membranes for non-aqueous nanofiltration. React Funct Polym 86:243–24710.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.015 ↗
32. Xu Y-C, Wang Z-X, Cheng X-Q, Xiao Y-C, Shao L (2016) Positively charged nanofiltration membranes via economically mussel-substance-simulated co-deposition for textile wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 303:555–56410.1016/j.cej.2016.06.024 ↗
33. Kong X, Zhou M-Y, Lin C-E, Wang J, Zhao B, Wei X-Z, Zhu B-K (2016) Polyamide/PVC based composite hollow fiber nanofiltration membranes: effect of substrate on properties and performance. J Membr Sci 505:231–24010.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.028 ↗
34. Wei X-Z, Wang S-X, Shi Y-Y, Xiang H, Chen J-Y, Zhu B-K (2014) Characterization of a positively charged composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membrane prepared by a simplified process. Desalination 350:44–5210.1016/j.desal.2014.07.012 ↗
35. Sun S-P, Hatton TA, Chung T-S (2011) Hyperbranched polyethyleneimine induced cross-linking of polyamide-imide nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for effective removal of ciprofloxacin. Environ Sci Technol 45:4003–400910.1021/es200345q ↗
36. Schaep J, Bruggen BVD, Vandecasteele C, Wilms D (1998) Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol 14:155–16210.1016/S1383-5866(98)00070-7 ↗
37. Galama AH, Post JW, Stuart MAC, Biesheuvel PM (2013) Validity of the Boltzmann equation to describe Donnan equilibrium at the membrane-solution interface. J Membr Sci 442:131–13910.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.022 ↗
38. Feng C-C, Xu J, Li M-M, Tang Y-Y, Gao C-J (2014) Studies on a novel nanofiltration membrane prepared by cross-linking of polyethyleneimine on polyacrylonitrile substrate. J Membr Sci 451:103–11010.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.003 ↗
39. Wang K-Y, Chung T-S (2006) Fabrication of polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for removal of chromate. J Membr Sci 281:307–31510.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.045 ↗
40. Li L-C, Wang B-G, Tan H-M, Chen T-L, Xu J-P (2006) A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 269:84–9310.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.021 ↗
41. Albrecht W, Seifert B, Weigel T, Schossig M, Holländer A, Groth T, Hilke R (2003) Amination of poly(ether imide) membranes using di- and multivalent amines. Macromol Chem Phys 204:510–52110.1002/macp.200390016 ↗
42. Vansek P (2000) Ionic conductivity and diffusion at infinite dilution. In: CRC handbook chemistry and physics, vol 5. pp 76–78