Effect of lattice misfit on the transition temperature of VO2 thin film
Source abstract
Abstract
Vanadium dioxide thin films were deposited on c-cut sapphire and MgO(111) substrate using pulsed laser deposition method to investigate the effect of lattice misfit between the thin film and the substrate on the transition temperature of VO2 thin film. All vanadium dioxide thin films showed heteroepitaxial growth with (002) preferred orientation. VO2/c-sapphire and VO2/MgO(111) had different transition temperatures, regardless of the thickness, orientation, and deposition conditions of the thin film. These results suggest that considering lattice mismatch between thin film and substrate is another promising option for controlling transition temperature of VO2 thin films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Ga2O3 and related materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Morin FJ (1959) Phys Rev Lett 3:34. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.3410.1103/PhysRevLett.3.34 ↗
2. Goodenough JB (1971) J Solid State Chem 3:49010.1016/0022-4596(71)90091-0 ↗
3. Griffiths CH, Eastwood HK (1974) J Appl Phys 45:2201. doi: 10.1063/1.166356810.1063/1.1663568 ↗
4. Chain EE (1986) J Vac Sci Technol A 4:432. doi: 10.1116/1.57389710.1116/1.573897 ↗
5. Razavi A, Bobyak L, Fallon P (1990) J Vac Sci Technol A 8:1391. doi: 10.1116/1.57688710.1116/1.576887 ↗
6. Fukuma M, Zembutsu S, Miyazawa S (1983) Appl Opt 22:26510.1364/AO.22.000265 ↗
7. Tang C et al (1985) Phys Rev B 31:100010.1103/PhysRevB.31.1000 ↗
8. Macchesney JB, Guggenheim HJ (1969) J Phys Chem Solids 30:22510.1016/0022-3697(69)90303-5 ↗
9. Jorgenson GV, Lee JC (1986) Sol Energy Mater 14:20510.1016/0165-1633(86)90047-X ↗
10. Holman KL et al (2009) Phys Rev B 79:245114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.24511410.1103/PhysRevB.79.245114 ↗
11. Case FC (1984) J Vac Sci Technol A 2:1509. doi: 10.1116/1.57246210.1116/1.572462 ↗
12. Gupta A, Narayan J, Dutta T (2010) Appl Phys Lett 97:151912. doi: 10.1063/1.350363210.1063/1.3503632 ↗
13. Okimura K, Sakai J, Ramanathan S (2010) J Appl Phys 107:063503. doi: 10.1063/1.332742210.1063/1.3327422 ↗
14. Xu G, Jin P, Tazawa M, Yoshimura K (2005) Appl Surf Sci 244:44910.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.157 ↗
15. Muraoka Y, Hiroi Z (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:583. doi: 10.1063/1.144621510.1063/1.1446215 ↗
16. Nag J, Payzant EA, More KL, Haglund RF Jr (2011) Appl Phys Lett 98:251916. doi: 10.1063/1.360033310.1063/1.3600333 ↗
17. Kato K, Song PK, Odaka H, Shigesato Y (2003) Jpn J Appl Phys 42:652310.1143/JJAP.42.6523 ↗
18. Yang TH, Jin C, Aggarwal R, Narayan RJ, Narayan J (2010) J Mater Res 25:422. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2010.005910.1557/JMR.2010.0059 ↗
19. Kovács GJ, Bürger D, Skorupa I, Reuther H, Heller R, Schmidt H (2011) J Appl Phys 109:063708. doi: 10.1063/1.356358810.1063/1.3563588 ↗
20. Nagashima K, Yanagida T, Tanaka H, Kawai T (2007) J Appl Phys 101:026103. doi: 10.1063/1.242432110.1063/1.2424321 ↗
21. Courtney TH (2000) Mechanical behavior of materials, 2nd edn. McGraw-hill, New York