Structures, thermal stability, and crystalline properties of polyamide6/organic-modified Fe-montmorillonite composite nanofibers by electrospinning
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, Fe-montmorillonite (Fe-MMT) was synthesized by hydrothermal method, and then was modified by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). The polyamide6 (PA6)/organic-modified Fe-montmorillonite (Fe-OMT) composite nanofibers were prepared by facile compounding and electrospinning. Fe-OMT was first dispersed in N, N-dimethyl formamide and then compounded with PA6 which was dissolved in formic acid. The composite solutions were electrospun to form PA6/Fe-OMT composite nanofibers. The structure, morphology, thermal stability, and crystalline properties of the composite nanofibers were characterized by Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR) spectra, Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), High-resolution electron microscopy (HREM), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), respectively. It was found that the silicate clay layers were well exfoliated within the composite nanofibers and were oriented along the fiber axis. The SEM images indicated that the loading of Fe-OMT decreased the diameters of composite nanofibers. TGA analyses revealed that the thermal stability was notably improved in the presence of silicate clay. It was also observed from wide-angle XRD analyses that the presence of nanoclays improved the γ-form crystals and induced the formations of α-form crystals of the PA6, attributed to effective nucleating effects of silicate clay platelets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Shonaike GO, Advani SG (2003) Advanced polymeric materials: structure property relationships. C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9780203492901 ↗
2. Kim GM, Michler GH, Ania F, Balta Calleja FJ (2007) Polymer 48:4814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.08210.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.082 ↗
3. Zhu J, Morgan AB, Lamelas FJ, Wilkie CA (2001) Chem Mater 13:3774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm000984r10.1021/cm000984r ↗
4. Vaia RA, Ishii H, Giannelis EP (1993) Chem Mater 5:1694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00036a00410.1021/cm00036a004 ↗
5. Fong H, Liu WD, Wang CS, Vaia RA (2002) Polymer 43:775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00665-610.1016/S0032-3861(01)00665-6 ↗
6. Li L, Bellan LM, Craighead HG, Frey MW (2006) Polymer 47:6208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.06.04910.1016/j.polymer.2006.06.049 ↗
7. Yoon KH, Polk MB, Min BG, Schiraldi DA (2004) Polym Int 53:2072. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.163010.1002/pi.1630 ↗
8. Wang M, Hsieh AJ, Rutledge GC (2005) Polymer 46:3407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.09910.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.099 ↗
9. Ji Y, Li BQ, Ge SR, Sokolov JC, Rafailovich MH (2006) Langmuir 22:1321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/la052502210.1021/la0525022 ↗
10. Hong JH, Jeong EH, Lee HS, Baik DH, Seo SW, Youk JH (2005) J Polym Sci Polym Phys 43:3171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2061010.1002/polb.20610 ↗
11. Lee YH, Lee JH, An IG, Kim C, Lee DS, Lee YK et al (2005) Biomaterials 26:3165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.018 ↗
12. Liu J, Hu Y, Wang SF, Song L, Chen ZY, Fan WC (2004) Colloid Polym Sci 282:291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-003-0978-y10.1007/s00396-003-0978-y ↗
13. Nagase T, Iwasaka T, Ebina T, Hayashi H, Onodera Y, Dutta NC (1999) Chem Lett 4:303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1999.30310.1246/cl.1999.303 ↗
14. Kong QH, Hu Y, Lu HD, Chen ZY, Fan WC (2005) J Mater Sci 40:4505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-0855-910.1007/s10853-005-0855-9 ↗
15. Chen GM, Shen DY, Feng M, Yang MS (2004) Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20040007910.1002/marc.200400079 ↗
16. Zong XH, Kim K, Fang DF, Ran SF, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2002) Polymer 43:4403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-610.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-6 ↗
17. Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) Polymer 45:2959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.00610.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.006 ↗
18. Choi JS, Lee SW, Jeong L, Bae SH, Min BC, Youk JH et al (2004) Int J Biol Macromol 34:249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2004.06.00110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2004.06.001 ↗
19. Xie W, Gao ZM, Pan WP, Vaia R, Hunter DL, Singh A (2000) Polym Mater Sci Eng 83:284
20. Xie W, Gao ZM, Pan WP, Hunter D, Singh A, Vaia R (2001) Chem Mater 13:2979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010305s10.1021/cm010305s ↗
21. Xie W, Xie RC, Pan WP, Hunter D, Koene B, Tan LS et al (2002) Chem Mater 14:4837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020705v10.1021/cm020705v ↗
22. Zhao CG, Qin HL, Gong FL, Feng M, Zhang SM, Yang MS (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 87:183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.005 ↗
23. Dunn P, Sansom GF (1969) J Appl Polym Sci 13:1657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.07013080710.1002/app.1969.070130807 ↗
24. Zhu J, Uhl FM, Morgan AB, Wilkie CA (2001) Chem Mater 13:4649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010451y10.1021/cm010451y ↗
25. Gilman JW, Jackson CL, Morgan AB, Harris R, Manias E, Giannelis EP (2000) Chem Mater 12:1866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm000176010.1021/cm0001760 ↗
26. Giza E, Ito H, Kikutani T, Okui N (2000) J Macromol Sci B 39:545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1081/MB-10010040310.1081/MB-100100403 ↗