journal article·2013-10Open access

The microstructure and fracture performance of styrene–butadiene–methylmethacrylate block copolymer-modified epoxy polymers

H. M. Chong, A. C. Taylor

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 19

Abstract

The microstructure and fracture performance of an anhydride-cured epoxy polymer modified with two poly(styrene)- b -1,4-poly(butadiene)- b -poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) block copolymers were investigated in bulk form, and when used as the matrix material in carbon fibre reinforced composites. The ‘E21’ SBM block copolymer has a higher butadiene content and molecular weight than the ‘E41’. A network of aggregated spherical micelles was observed for the E21 SBM modified epoxy, which became increasingly interconnected as the SBM content was increased. A steady increase in the fracture energy was measured with increasing E21 content, from 96 to 511 J/m 2 for 15 wt% of E21. Well-dispersed ‘raspberry’-like SBM particles, with a sphere-on-sphere morphology of a poly(styrene) core covered with poly(butadiene) particles, in an epoxy matrix were obtained for loadings up to 7.5 wt% of E41 SBM. This changed to a partially phase-inverted structure at higher E41 contents, accompanied by a significant jump in the measured fracture energy to 1032 J/m 2 at 15 wt% of E41. The glass transition temperatures remained unchanged with the addition of SBM, indicating a complete phase separation. Electron microscopy and cross polarised transmission optical microscopy revealed localised shear band yielding, debonding and void growth as the main toughening mechanisms. Significant improvements in fracture energy were not observed in the fibre composites, indicating poor toughness transfer from the bulk to the composite. The fibre bridging observed for the unmodified epoxy matrix was reduced due to better fibre–matrix adhesion. The size of the crack tip deformation zone in the composites was restricted by the fibres, hence reducing the measured fracture energy compared to the bulk for the toughest matrix materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Giannakopoulos G, Masania K, Taylor AC (2011) J Mater Sci 46(2):327. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4816-610.1007/s10853-010-4816-6 ↗
2. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1996) Polymer 37(20):4529. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-910.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-9 ↗
3. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24(October):1341. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-810.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
4. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1986) J Mater Sci 21(7):2475. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429410.1007/BF01114294 ↗
5. Cardwell BJ, Yee AF (1998) J Mater Sci 33(22):5473. doi: 10.1023/A:100442712338810.1023/A:1004427123388 ↗
6. White KL, Sue HJ (2011) Polym Eng Sci 51(11):2245. doi: 10.1002/pen.2199610.1002/pen.21996 ↗
7. Bucknall CB, Partridge IK (1983) Polymer 24(5):639. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-910.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-9 ↗
8. Kinloch AJ, Yuen ML, Jenkins SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29(14):3781. doi: 10.1007/BF0035734910.1007/BF00357349 ↗
9. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) Polymer 51(26):6284. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.04810.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048 ↗
10. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Polymer 48(2):530. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.03810.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
11. Mallick PK, Broutman LJ (1975) Mater Sci Eng 18(1):63. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(75)90073-710.1016/0025-5416(75)90073-7 ↗
12. Kawaguchi T, Pearson RA (2003) Polymer 44(15):4239. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00372-010.1016/S0032-3861(03)00372-0 ↗
13. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Kinloch IA (2011) J Mater Sci 46(12):7525. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5724-010.1007/s10853-011-5724-0 ↗
14. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2005) Compos Sci Tech 65(15–16):2300. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021 ↗
15. Park S-J, Jin F-L, Lee C (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 402(1–2):33510.1016/j.msea.2005.05.015 ↗
16. Brown EN, Sottos NR, White SR (2002) Exp Mech 42(4):372. doi: 10.1007/BF0241214110.1007/BF02412141 ↗
17. Azimi HR, Pearson RA, Hertzberg RW (1995) J Appl Polymer Sci 58(2):449. doi: 10.1002/app.1995.07058022310.1002/app.1995.070580223 ↗
18. Manjunatha CM, Taylor AC, Kinloch AJ, Sprenger S (2009) J Mater Sci 44(1):342. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3092-110.1007/s10853-008-3092-1 ↗
19. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2011) J Appl Polymer Sci 119(4):2135. doi: 10.1002/app.3293710.1002/app.32937 ↗
20. Hunston DL, Moulton RJ, Johnston NJ, Bascom WD (1987) In: Johnston NJ (ed) Toughened Composites. ASTM, Philadelphia, p 7410.1520/STP24372S ↗
21. Fine T, Pascault J-P (2006) Macromol Symp 245–246(1):375. doi: 10.1002/masy.20065135210.1002/masy.200651352 ↗
22. Dean JM, Grubbs RB, Saad W, Cook RF, Bates FS (2003) J Polym Sci B 41(20):2444. doi: 10.1002/polb.1059510.1002/polb.10595 ↗
23. Dean JM, Lipic PM, Grubbs RB, Cook RF, Bates FS (2001) J Polym Sci B 39(23):2996. doi: 10.1002/polb.1006210.1002/polb.10062 ↗
24. Gerard P, Boupat NP, Fine T, Gervat L, Pascault J-P (2007) Macromol Symp 256:55. doi: 10.1002/masy.20075100610.1002/masy.200751006 ↗
25. Hydro RM, Pearson RA (2007) J Polym Sci Part B 45(12):1470. doi: 10.1002/polb.2116610.1002/polb.21166 ↗
26. Ritzenthaler S, Court F, Girard-Reydet E, Leibler L, Pascault JP (2003) Macromolecules 36(1):118. doi: 10.1021/ma021107510.1021/ma0211075 ↗
27. Rebizant V, Abetz V, Tournilhac F, Court F, Leibler L (2003) Macromolecules 36(26):9889. doi: 10.1021/ma034756510.1021/ma0347565 ↗
28. Ritzenthaler S, Court F, David L, Girard-Reydet E, Leibler L, Pascault JP (2002) Macromolecules 35(16):6245. doi: 10.1021/ma012186810.1021/ma0121868 ↗
29. Thio YS, Wu JX, Bates FS (2006) Macromolecules 39(21):7187. doi: 10.1021/ma052731v10.1021/ma052731v ↗
30. Larrañaga M, Gabilondo N, Kortaberria G, Serrano E, Remiro P, Riccardi CC, Mondragon I (2005) Polymer 46(18):7082. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.10210.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.102 ↗
31. Thio YS, Wu JX, Bates FS (2009) J Polym Sci B 47(11):1125. doi: 10.1002/polb.2170710.1002/polb.21707 ↗
32. Technical Data Sheet-Nanostrength for Epoxies (2011). Arkema, Colombes
33. XC305 Data Sheet (2012). Gurit, Newport
34. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) J Mater Sci 45(5):1193. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
35. BS-EN-ISO-527-1 (1996) Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 1: General Principles. BSI, London
36. Williams JG, Ford H (1964) J Mech Eng Sci 6(4):40510.1243/JMES_JOUR_1964_006_055_02 ↗
37. BS-EN-ISO-14125 (1998) Fibre-reinforced plastic composites—determination of flexural properties. BSI, London
38. BS-EN-ISO-14130 (1998) Fibre-reinforced plastic composites. Determination of apparent interlaminar shear strength by short-beam method. BSI, London
39. ASTM-D5045-99 (1999) Standard Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
40. BS-7991 (2001) Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens. BSI, London
41. Mimura K, Ito H, Kujioka H (2000) Polymer 41(12):4451. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00700-410.1016/S0032-3861(99)00700-4 ↗
42. Biolley N, Pascal T, Sillion B (1994) Polymer 35(3):55810.1016/0032-3861(94)90511-8 ↗
43. Cho JB, Hwang JW, Cho K, An JH, Park CE (1993) Polymer 34(23):4832. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90005-U10.1016/0032-3861(93)90005-U ↗
44. Sultan JN, McGarry FJ (1973) Polym Eng Sci 13(1):29. doi: 10.1002/pen.76013010510.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
45. Bowden PB (1973) In: Haward RN (ed) The Physics of Glassy Polymers, 1st edn. Applied Science Publishers, London, p 27910.1007/978-94-010-2355-9_6 ↗
46. Chen J, Taylor AC (2012) J Mater Sci 47(11):4546. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6313-610.1007/s10853-012-6313-6 ↗
47. Thompson ZJ, Hillmyer MA, Liu J, Sue HJ, Dettloff M, Bates FS (2009) Macromolecules 42(7):2333. doi: 10.1021/ma900061b10.1021/ma900061b ↗
48. Liu J, Sue HJ, Thompson ZJ, Bates FS, Dettloff M, Jacob G, Verghese N, Pham H (2009) Polymer 50(19):4683. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.00610.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.006 ↗
49. Andrews EH (1968) Fracture in Polymers, 1st edn. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
50. Mohammed RD (2007) Material properties and fracture mechanisms of epoxy nano-composites. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London
51. Marissen R, Brouwer HR (1999) Compos Sci Tech 59(3):327. doi: 10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00071-210.1016/S0266-3538(98)00071-2 ↗
52. Irwin GR (1964) Appl Mater Res 3(2):65
53. Bradley WL (1989) Key Eng Mater 37:16110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.37.161 ↗
54. Hull D (1981) An Introduction to Composite Materials. Cambridge Solid State Science Series, 1 edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
55. Quaresimin M, Varley RJ (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68(3–4):718. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.005 ↗